Table 3: The 17 microlensing candidates of the MACHO collaboration (Alcock et al. 2000b). Candidates 20, 22 and 27 (marked B) are low signal-to-noise candidates not satisfying the MACHO "A'' requirements. Candidate 9 is due to a binary lens and does not satisfy their A requirements. The values of $t_{\rm E}$ and maximum amplification $A_{\rm max}$ are from the MACHO fit assuming no blending, and t₀ is given as JD-2 450 000. Candidates 18 and 25 are each within $1~{\rm arcsec}$ of an object of similar magnitude that is resolved by the MACHO analysis but blended in the EROS analysis. Candidates 14 and 20 occurred during EROS-2 observations, and the EROS-2 values of $t_{\rm E}$ and $A_{\rm max}$ are shown in parentheses (averages of $R_{\rm eros}$ and $B_{\rm eros}$ measurements).
MACHO candidate EROS-2 star $R_{\rm eros}$ $(B-R)_{\rm eros}$ t₀ $t_{\rm E}$ $A_{\rm max}$ Comments

MACHO-LMC-1 lm019-6k-14879 18.97 0.61 -942.9 17.20 7.15

MACHO-LMC-4 lm057-0l-27696 19.85 0.24 -353.1 22.70 2.92

MACHO-LMC-5 lm057-0k-27469 19.97 1.52 -976.1 37.80 47.28

MACHO-LMC-6 too faint -802.9 45.80 2.43

MACHO-LMC-7 lm010-2k-21383 20.47 0.52 -536.5 51.45 5.91

MACHO-LMC-8 too faint -612.2 33.20 2.19

MACHO-LMC-9 B-binary lm001-0l-6864 20.92 0.83 -400.1 89.60 1.95

MACHO-LMC-13 lm020-6m-19733 21.03 -0.07 134.0 50.05 2.36

MACHO-LMC-14 lm002-7n-24616 18.84 391.3 50.05 (38.2) 3.37 (2.77)

MACHO-LMC-15 too faint 472.4 18.40 2.83

MACHO-LMC-18 lm060-2n-16057 18.35 0.47 -217.2 37.10 1.54 Bright Sample

MACHO-LMC-20 B lm012-5n-23157 20.09 1.03 774.7 36.35 (23.2) 2.95 (3.1)

MACHO-LMC-21 dead zone -786.8 46.60 5.64

MACHO-LMC-22 B dead zone -43.3 114.65 2.70

MACHO-LMC-23 lm055-3n-4994 19.82 0.37 -237.7 42.60 2.41 variable (Fig. 10)

MACHO-LMC-25 lm017-2m-2056 17.95 -265.7 42.60 1.50 Bright Sample

MACHO-LMC-27 B lm010-0n-23830 19.00 0.14 -485.9 25.25 1.45

**Table 3:** The 17 microlensing candidates of the MACHO collaboration (Alcock et al. 2000b). Candidates 20, 22 and 27 (marked B) are low signal-to-noise candidates not satisfying the MACHO "A'' requirements. Candidate 9 is due to a binary lens and does not satisfy their A requirements. The values of $t_{\rm E}$ and maximum amplification $A_{\rm max}$ are from the MACHO fit assuming no blending, and t₀ is given as JD-2 450 000. Candidates 18 and 25 are each within $1~{\rm arcsec}$ of an object of similar magnitude that is resolved by the MACHO analysis but blended in the EROS analysis. Candidates 14 and 20 occurred during EROS-2 observations, and the EROS-2 values of $t_{\rm E}$ and $A_{\rm max}$ are shown in parentheses (averages of $R_{\rm eros}$ and $B_{\rm eros}$ measurements).
MACHO candidate	EROS-2 star	$R_{\rm eros}$	$(B-R)_{\rm eros}$	t₀	$t_{\rm E}$	$A_{\rm max}$	Comments
MACHO-LMC-1	lm019-6k-14879	18.97	0.61	-942.9	17.20	7.15
MACHO-LMC-4	lm057-0l-27696	19.85	0.24	-353.1	22.70	2.92
MACHO-LMC-5	lm057-0k-27469	19.97	1.52	-976.1	37.80	47.28
MACHO-LMC-6	too faint			-802.9	45.80	2.43
MACHO-LMC-7	lm010-2k-21383	20.47	0.52	-536.5	51.45	5.91
MACHO-LMC-8	too faint			-612.2	33.20	2.19
MACHO-LMC-9 B-binary	lm001-0l-6864	20.92	0.83	-400.1	89.60	1.95
MACHO-LMC-13	lm020-6m-19733	21.03	-0.07	134.0	50.05	2.36
MACHO-LMC-14	lm002-7n-24616	18.84		391.3	50.05 (38.2)	3.37 (2.77)
MACHO-LMC-15	too faint			472.4	18.40	2.83
MACHO-LMC-18	lm060-2n-16057	18.35	0.47	-217.2	37.10	1.54	Bright Sample
MACHO-LMC-20 B	lm012-5n-23157	20.09	1.03	774.7	36.35 (23.2)	2.95 (3.1)
MACHO-LMC-21	dead zone			-786.8	46.60	5.64
MACHO-LMC-22 B	dead zone			-43.3	114.65	2.70
MACHO-LMC-23	lm055-3n-4994	19.82	0.37	-237.7	42.60	2.41	variable (Fig. 10)
MACHO-LMC-25	lm017-2m-2056	17.95		-265.7	42.60	1.50	Bright Sample
MACHO-LMC-27 B	lm010-0n-23830	19.00	0.14	-485.9	25.25	1.45

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text