Table 3: Summary of carbon abundances and isotopic ratios produced with the 3D model by the three different 12C16O line lists, as well as the adopted values. Note the poor agreement of the LE results with the other two, reflecting the trend seen in Fig. 4. Adopted values were calculated via 2:0:1 weightings of the weak:LE: $\Delta v = 2$ lists.
12C16O List Weak LE $\Delta v = 2$ Adopted Terrestrial
$\log\epsilon_{\rm C}$ $8.40\pm0.01$ $8.48\pm0.04$ $8.37\pm0.01$ $8.39\pm0.05$  
12C/13C 88.8 +5.3-5.0 107.6 +13-12 82.8 +5.2-4.9 86.8 +3.9-3.7 $89.4\pm 0.2$
           
16O/18O 490 +41-37 594 +80-71 457 +39-36 479 +29-28 $498.7\pm 0.1$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text