\begin{table}%t3
\caption{Summary of carbon abundances and isotopic ratios produced with the 3D~model by the three~different $^{12}$C$^{16}$O~line lists, as well as the adopted values.  Note the poor agreement of the LE~results with the other two, reflecting the trend seen in Fig.~\protect\ref{plotsCOLE}.  Adopted values were calculated via 2:0:1~weightings of the \mbox{weak:LE:$\Delta v = 2$}~lists.}
\label{summary}
%\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c}
\hline \hline
% & & & & & \\[-8pt]
$^{12}$C$^{16}$O List & Weak & LE & $\Delta v = 2$ & Adopted & Terrestrial\\
\hline
$\log \epsilon_{\rm C}$ & $8.40\pm0.01$ & $8.48\pm0.04$ & $8.37\pm0.01$ & $8.39\pm0.05$ & \\
$^{12}$C/$^{13}$C & 88.8$^{+5.3}_{-5.0}$ & 107.6$^{+13}_{-12}$ & 82.8$^{+5.2}_{-4.9}$ & 86.8$^{+3.9}_{-3.7}$ & $89.4\pm 0.2$  \\
 & & & & & \\[-8pt]
$^{16}$O/$^{18}$O & 490$^{+41}_{-37}$ & 594$^{+80}_{-71}$ & 457$^{+39}_{-36}$ & 479$^{+29}_{-28}$ & $498.7\pm 0.1$  \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}