All Tables

Table 1: Oxygen and nitrogen abundances used in line formation calculations for each model in this study. 3D, HM and MARCS values are from Asplund et al. (2004), 1DAV oxygen calculated using the same lines as Asplund et al. (2004) and 1DAV nitrogen abundance simply set to the 3D value.
Table 2: Abundances and isotopic ratios implied by the weak ( $\Delta v = 1$ ), LE ( $\Delta v = 1$ ) and $\Delta v = 2$ ¹²C¹⁶O line lists as indicator of ¹²C abundance. Note the large differences between 1D and 3D isotopic ratios. Note also that the HM and MARCS 1D models indicate higher abundances than the 1DAV, which in turn produces a higher abundance than the 3D model.
Table 3: Summary of carbon abundances and isotopic ratios produced with the 3D model by the three different ¹²C¹⁶O line lists, as well as the adopted values. Note the poor agreement of the LE results with the other two, reflecting the trend seen in Fig. 4. Adopted values were calculated via 2:0:1 weightings of the weak:LE: $\Delta v = 2$ lists.
Table C.1: Strong ¹²C¹⁶O line list used for the Sect. 5 study, consisting of 31 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).
Table C.2: Weak ¹²C¹⁶O line list used for the Sect. 6 study, consisting of 13 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).
Table C.3: ¹³C¹⁶O line list used for the Sect. 6 study, consisting of 16 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).
Table C.4: ¹²C¹⁸O line list used for the Sect. 6 study, consisting of 15 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).
Table C.5: Low excitation (LE) ¹²C¹⁶O line list used for the Sect. 6 study, consisting of 15 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).
Table C.6: First overtone ( $\Delta v = 2$ ) ¹²C¹⁶O line list used for the Sect. 6 study, consisting of 66 lines. $\log gf$ data calculated from Goorvitch & Chackerian (1994).