Table 2: Comparison between the observed periods of PG 1159-035 (taken from KB94) and the theoretical ( $\ell = 1$ ) periods of the best-fit model ( $\overline {\delta \Pi }= 1.79$ s, $\sigma _{\delta \Pi }= 2.21$ s).
$\Pi_i^{\rm O}$ $\Pi_k^{\rm T}$ k $\delta \Pi_i$ $\delta \Pi_i/ \Pi_i$

[s] [s] [s] $[\%]$

430.04 433.21 18 -3.17 -0.74

450.71 453.49 19 -2.78 -0.62

469.57 473.51 20 -3.94 -0.84

494.85 496.58 21 -1.73 -0.35

517.18 517.10 22 0.08 0.02

538.16 537.50 23 0.66 0.12

558.44 559.15 24 -0.71 -0.13

581.29 580.55 25 0.74 0.13

603.04 601.28 26 1.76 0.29

622.60 622.60 27 0.00 0.00

643.41 645.24 28 -1.83 -0.28

666.22 665.09 29 1.13 0.17

687.71 686.29 30 1.42 0.21

707.92 709.95 31 -2.03 -0.29

729.50 729.65 32 -0.15 -0.02

753.12 750.01 33 3.11 0.41

773.77 773.33 34 0.44 0.06

790.94 795.17 35 -4.23 -0.53

817.12 814.96 36 2.16 0.26

840.02 836.27 37 3.75 0.45

**Table 2:** Comparison between the observed periods of PG 1159-035 (taken from KB94) and the theoretical ( $\ell = 1$ ) periods of the best-fit model ( $\overline {\delta \Pi }= 1.79$ s, $\sigma _{\delta \Pi }= 2.21$ s).
$\Pi_i^{\rm O}$	$\Pi_k^{\rm T}$	k	$\delta \Pi_i$	$\delta \Pi_i/ \Pi_i$
[s]	[s]		[s]	$[\%]$
430.04	433.21	18	-3.17	-0.74
450.71	453.49	19	-2.78	-0.62
469.57	473.51	20	-3.94	-0.84
494.85	496.58	21	-1.73	-0.35
517.18	517.10	22	0.08	0.02
538.16	537.50	23	0.66	0.12
558.44	559.15	24	-0.71	-0.13
581.29	580.55	25	0.74	0.13
603.04	601.28	26	1.76	0.29
622.60	622.60	27	0.00	0.00
643.41	645.24	28	-1.83	-0.28
666.22	665.09	29	1.13	0.17
687.71	686.29	30	1.42	0.21
707.92	709.95	31	-2.03	-0.29
729.50	729.65	32	-0.15	-0.02
753.12	750.01	33	3.11	0.41
773.77	773.33	34	0.44	0.06
790.94	795.17	35	-4.23	-0.53
817.12	814.96	36	2.16	0.26
840.02	836.27	37	3.75	0.45

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text