A&A 401, 243-263 (2003)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021865
S. Dado1 - A. Dar 1 - A. De Rújula2
1 - Physics Department and Space Research Institute, Technion
Haifa 32000, Israel
2 - Theory Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Received 2 May 2002 / Accepted 21 November 2002
Abstract
We use the cannonball (CB) model of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) to predict the
spectral and temporal behaviour of their radio afterglows (AGs). A single
simple expression describes the AGs at all times and frequencies; its
high-frequency limit reproduces the successful CB model predictions for
optical and X-ray AGs. We analyze all of the observed radio AGs of GRBs
with known redshifts, including those of the exceptionally close-by GRB 980425. We also study in detail the time-evolution of the AGs' spectral
index. The agreement between theory and observations is excellent, even
though the CB model is extremely frugal in the number of parameters
required to explain the radio observations. We propose to use the
scintillations in the radio AGs of GRBs to verify and measure the
hyperluminal speed of their jetted CBs, whose apparent angular velocity is
of the same order of magnitude as that of galactic pulsars, consistently
measured directly, or via scintillations.
Key words: gamma-rays: bursts
The CB paradigm gives a good description of the properties of
the -rays
in a GRB, that we modelled in simple approximations in
Dar & De Rújula (2000b).
It suggests an alternative (Dar & De Rújula 2001a),
which is rather promising (Dado et al. 2002), to
the ``Fe-line'' interpretation of the spectral lines observed
in some X-ray afterglows (GRB 970508: Piro et al. 1998;
GRB 970828: Yoshida et al. 1999, 2001; GRB 991216: Piro et al. 2000;
GRB 000214: Antonelli et al. 2000). The model also provides
an extremely simple and successful description of the spectrum,
and of the shape and absolute magnitude of the light curves of the
optical and X-ray afterglows of all GRBs of known redshift,
at all observed times (Dado et al. 2001, hereafter called DDD 2001).
This description is universal, it encompasses the early optical
flash of GRB 990123, the very peculiar optical and X-ray AG of GRB 970508,
and all of the properties of GRB 980425, associated with SN1998bw.
In this paper we derive the CB model's predictions for radio afterglows, and compare them to all radio observations in GRBs of known redshift. We also study the evolution of the spectral index of AGs as a function of time. The CB model - in parameter-thrifty and very simple terms - passes these tests with flying colours.
The ISM nuclei (mainly protons) that a CB scatters also decelerate its
flight: its Lorentz factor, ,
is calculable. Travelling at
a large
and viewed at a small angle
,
the CB's emissions
are strongly relativistically aberrant: in minutes of observer's time,
the CBs are parsecs away from their source. For a constant CB radius and
an approximately constant ISM density,
has an explicit
analytical expression, as discussed in Appendix A. Typically
at a distance of order 1 kpc from the source, and
.
Due to a limited observational sensitivity, GRBs
have been detected only up to angles
of a few times
.
The ISM electrons entering a CB are caught up and bounce off
its enclosed magnetic domains acquiring a predictable power-law energy
spectrum, as we argue in Sect. 3. In the CB's rest system
below an energy
,
steepening to
,
with
,
above this energy
.
The energy
does not correspond to the conventional
synchrotron ``cooling break'' but to the injection bend at the
energy at which electrons enter the CB with a Lorentz factor
.
In Sect. 4 we discuss the observational
support of the existence of the injection bend, which is strong.
Given the very large magnetic and radiation energy densities
in the CB, the usual cooling break (at the energy at which
the energy-loss rate due to synchrotron emission and inverse Compton
scattering equals that due to bremsstrahlung,
adiabatic losses and escape) happens only at subrelativistic energies,
as discussed in Appendix B.
The magnetic energy-density in a CB (DDD 2001) is:
For the first 103 s of observer's time,
a CB is still cooling fast and emitting
via thermal bremsstrahlung (DDD 2001), but after that
the CB emissivity integrated over frequency is
equal to the energy deposition rate of the ISM
electrons in the CB
:
An observer in the GRB progenitor's rest system,
viewing a CB at an angle
(corresponding to
in the CB's proper frame), sees its radiation
Doppler-boosted by a factor
:
In DDD 2001 we fit, in the CB model, the R-band AG light curves of
GRBs. The fit involves five parameters per GRB:
the overall normalization; :
the viewing angle;
:
the t=0 value of the
Lorentz factor;
:
the ``deceleration''
parameter of the CBs in the ISM; and the
spectral index p. The value of p, obtained
from the temporal shape of the afterglow, is in every case
very close to the expectation p=2.2, and - within
the often large uncertainties induced by absorption - with
the observed spectra from optical frequencies to X-rays (DDD 2001).
In this paper we complete our previous work by making broad-band
fits to the data at all available radio and optical frequencies.
In so doing, we need to introduce just one new ``radio''
parameter: an ``absorption frequency'' ,
corresponding
to unit CB opacity at a reference frequency. We set p=2.2 so
that the extension to a broad-band analysis does not involve an
increase in the total number of parameters. We have to refer very
often to the values of the parameters that our previous experience
with the CB model made us choose as reference values. For convenience,
these are listed in Table 1.
The predictions of the CB model, for typical parameters,
are summarized in Fig. 1. The energy density spectra
at radio to optical frequencies are shown, at various times after
the GRB, in the upper panel. The spectral slopes before and soon after
the peak frequency are
and -(p-1)/2, as indicated.
The spectra peak at a frequency at which self-attenuation in the CBs
results in an opacity of
(1).
At frequencies well above the frequency
characterizing
the injection bend, the spectrum steepens to a slope -p/2.
In the figure's lower panel
we show light curves at various radio frequencies. At large times
and for
- which is the case at all frequencies
in the example of Fig. 1, whose parameters
are close to those of GRB 000301c - they
tend to
,
this behaviour being reached
at earlier times, the higher the frequency.
For
,
the corresponding limiting behaviour
is
t-4/3, observable at low frequencies
in the cases of GRBs 991216, 991208 and 000418. All of the above
predictions are robust: they do not depend on the
detailed form of the attenuation, cumulation and limb-darkening
factors. The early rise
of the light curves does depend on such details, on which
we shall have to invest a disproportionate effort in Sects. 5 to 7.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Typical predictions for the CB model's radio afterglow.
Upper panel: spectra at different times, from 1 to 300 days.
The peak frequencies correspond to CB self-opacities of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The CB model provides an excellent description of the data, as discussed in Sects. 4, 8 and 9. In the case of GRB 980425, for which the optical AG is dominated by SN1998bw, we used the parameters that fit its X-ray afterglow (DDD 2001) and the GRB's fluence (Dar & De Rújula 2000a) to argue that they are not exceptional. The CB-model's description of the radio data for this GRB/SN pair is excellent: there is nothing peculiar about this GRB, nor about its associated supernova, as we discuss in detail in Sect. 9, along with the question of the angular separation in the sky of the SN and the associated CBs, which may have been, or may still be, observable.
The apparent sky velocities of cosmological CBs are extremely superluminal and their angular velocities happen to be of the same order of magnitude as those of galactic pulsars. This implies that CB velocities can possibly be extracted from their observed radio scintillations, as discussed in Sect. 12.
The acceleration of charged particles by a moving CB is not substantially different from some of the cases already studied in the literature, the acceleration of cosmic rays and electrons having attracted an enormous amount of attention since Fermi's first analysis in 1949 (for an excellent introduction, see Longair 1994). The most efficient and thus promising mechanism is the ``first-order'' acceleration of particles by fast-moving shocks, extensively studied analytically and numerically since the pioneering works of Axford et al. (1977), Krymsky (1977), Bell (1978) and Blandford & Ostriker (1978). The analysis closest to the case at hand is that of Ballard & Heavens (1992), who studied acceleration by relativistic shocks, with the charged particles deflected by highly disordered magnetic fields, rather than, as it is generally assumed, by small irregularities in an otherwise uniform field. The ``relativistic'' and ``chaotic'' inputs are what make this work particularly relevant to the case of particle acceleration by and within CBs.
Ballard and Heavens study numerically, for various values of a
moving discontinuity's Lorentz factor ranging up to
,
the result of its collision with an isotropic ensemble of particles
with
.
They find that, for
,
the resulting particle energy distribution has a break (in this reference
system) at
,
at which point it steepens.
The particles below the break have a dominantly
very forward motion: they are the ones which have been upscattered
just once. Given this hint, it is easy to reproduce the numerical
results in an analytic approximation. In the shock's rest system,
the energy of the particles that have been scattered only once
is equal to their incoming energy: the break in the spectrum
seen in the simulations is a kinematical break occurring roughly
at the injection energy. ``Observed'' in the system in which the
shock is travelling at
,
this injection bend
is very reminiscent of the familiar synchrotron-cooling ``break'',
but it has little to do with it; indeed, in the simulations of Ballard &
Heavens (1992) cooling was entirely neglected.
Consider the CB in its rest system and temporarily postpone the
discussion of cooling. The ISM electrons impinge on the CB in a fixed direction
with a Lorentz factor equal to that of the CB in the GRB progenitor's rest system,
.
The electrons not having ``bounced back''
off the CB's strong magnetic field, or having
done it only once, retain the incoming energy,
,
so that their energy distribution is:
.
A very robust (i.e. detail independent) feature of the studies
of acceleration by relativistic shocks is that the particles
having bounced more than once acquire a spectrum
,
with p=2 in analytical approximations and
in numerical simulations. A few bounces are sufficient to attain
such a spectrum. The CB is a system of finite transverse dimensions
and the magnetic field contrast between its interior and its exterior
is very large. Thus, we do not expect the same electron to bounce
many times off the CB, as the latter catches up with it. The
acceleration should occur mainly within the CB as charged particles
bounce off its chaotically moving magnetic domains, and it should be very
fast and efficient, since the injection is highly relativistic and
there is no distinction between ``first and second order Fermi'' processes.
The overall ``source''
spectrum of relativistic electrons is:
The electron energy loss by synchrotron radiation is:
The injection bend induces the gradual transition
in the spectral energy distribution described by Eq. (4), occurring
at a ``bend'' frequency:
For the reference CB parameters and z=1,
Hz,
above the optical band. Since the product
typically
declines by more than an order of magnitude within a couple of days,
the bend frequency in many GRBs
crosses the optical band into the NIR during the early afterglow.
In Fig. 2 we present the time dependence of
for
and 750, characterizing the range
of the observations, for various angles
,
z=1,
and the rest of the parameters at their reference values of Table 1.
The figures show that, depending on the parameters, the bend frequency
in the early AG may be above or below the optical band, and, if it is above,
it will cross it later.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Typical predictions for the bend frequency in the AG spectrum
as a function of time, for
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The bend frequency of the CB model is not the break frequency of the traditional fireball model. The time evolution of the former is given by Eq. (14), and is different from that of the latter, which, prior to the ``break'' in the AG light-curve, can be shown to be t-1/2 (Granot & Sari 2002).
The evolution predicted by Eq. (4) from a
to a
spectral behaviour is affected by extinction.
The early behaviour corresponds to times when CBs are not yet
very far from their progenitors: extinction in the host galaxy
may steepen the spectrum. After a day or more, when the CBs
are further away, we do not expect strong extinction in the host.
So the prediction (after extinction in the Galaxy is corrected for)
is an evolution from a behaviour close to - or steeper than -
,
to a more universal
at
later times.
The predicted spectral behaviour has been observed,
with varying degrees of significance, in
the AG of several GRBs, listed in Table 2.
The first column is the bend frequency
at t=0,
computed with Eq. (14) and the optical AG parameters of
Table 3
(the density np is extracted from the measured
with use of Eq. (38)
and our reference
and
). For the listed
GRBs the bend frequency is above the visible band at t=0 and the
early AG measurements result in effective spectral slopes,
,
not far from the expectation
,
or somewhat steeper.
A few days later, the measured
values,
,
are compatible with the expectation
.
The second entry on GRB 990510 in Table 2
(Beuermann et al. 1999)
requires an explanation. These authors argue that
,
a result that assumes a strong
extinction correction in the host galaxy. But, after a day or so,
we do not expect such an extinction. For the latest points measured by Beuermann et al. (1999),
at day 3.85 (well after the bend),
and
.
Converting these results - without
extinction - to a spectral slope yields
,
in agreement with expectation.
|
The evolution from a
softer to a harder spectrum should be a gradual change in time, rather
than a sharp break, so that an AG's optical spectrum, if ``caught'' as
the injection bend is ``passing'' should have an index evolving
from
to
with the time dependence
described by Eqs. (4) and (14).
In Fig. 3 we test this prediction in the case of GRB 970508, for
the time-dependent value of the ``effective'' slope
,
constructed from the theoretical expectation in the
same frequency intervals used by the observers.
The actual predicted
in Eq. (14) is obtained by use of
the optical-AG fitted parameters (
,
and
)
that determine
and
,
and
the density np deduced
from
and the reference
and
.
The data are gathered by Galama et al. (1998a) from
observations in the U, B, V,
and
bands
(Castro-Tirado et al. 1998; Galama et al. 1998b;
Metzger et al. 1997; Sokolov et al. 1998; Zharikov et al. 1998),
by Chary et al. (1998)
for K band results, and by Pian et al. (1998) for the H band.
![]() |
Figure 3:
A comparison between the predicted evolution in time
of the effective spectral slope through the optical/NIR band and
the data collected by Galama et al. (1998a) for
the U, B, V, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
In spite of considerable uncertainties in the spectral slopes deduced from observations (Galama et al. 1998a), the results shown in Fig. 3 are satisfactory: the observed crossing of the injection bend is in agreement with the theoretical prediction, based on the fit in DDD 2001 to the overall R-band light curve from which the GRB 970508 AG parameters have been fixed; no extra parameters have been fit. A couple of points in the lower panel do not agree with the prediction, but they do not agree with the observations at very nearby frequencies reported in the upper panel, either.
A complementary analysis to that in the previous paragraph is the
study of an AG's optical spectrum at a fixed time at which
the injection bend is crossing the observed frequency range,
or is nearby. A spectral ``snapshot'' at such time should have
the intermediate slope
and curvature described by Eq. (4) for
.
To test this prognosis,
we compare in Fig. 4 the predicted spectral
shape of the optical/NIR AG of GRB 000301c around March 4.45 UT
(
3 days after burst) to its measured shape (Jensen et al. 2001).
We have selected this GRB because its extinction correction in the galactic ISM
is rather small:
E(B - V)=0.05 (Schlegel et al. 1998),
and there is no evidence for significant extinction in the
host galaxy (Jensen et al. 2001). The theoretical line in Fig. 4
is given by Eq. (4) with the observer's
of Eq. (14) (
Hz at
t=3 days, for the density deduced from the value of
of this GRB, and the reference values of
and
).
In the figure the theory's normalization is arbitrary but the (slightly
evolving) slope of the theoretical curve is an absolute prediction:
it is based on the fit in DDD 2001 to the overall R-band light curve and,
once more, no extra parameters have been fit.
The result is astonishingly good, even for the curvature which
- given the figure's aspect ratio as chosen by
the observers - is not easily visualized (a look at a slant angle helps).
The late-time spectral slope deduced
from the HST observations (Smette et al. 2001) around day
33.5 after burst indicated a slope of
-1.1, again in agreement
with our expectation.
![]() |
Figure 4:
Comparison between the observations and the
(parameter-less) prediction
for the spectral shape of the optical AG of GRB 000301c, at
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We conclude that the evidence is very strong for a spectral injection bend at the time-dependent frequency, Eq. (14), predicted in the CB model. As illustrated in Fig. 1 and contrasted with data in Sect. 8, further evidence for the injection bend is provided by the fact that it is essential to the description of the observed broad-band spectra of GRB afterglows.
Three factors that are irrelevant in the optical and X-ray domains play a role in the description of the longer radio wavelengths and the early radio AG. In this section we discuss the first one of them.
Electrons that enter a CB with an injection Lorentz factor are rapidly Fermi accelerated to a distribution that we have argued
to be roughly that of Eq. (9). On a longer time scale, they
lose energy by synchrotron radiation, and their
energy distribution evolves as in Eq. (11).
Electrons with a large
emit
synchrotron radiation, with no significant time-delay,
at the observer's optical and X-ray wavelengths.
But the emission of radio is delayed by the time it takes the electrons
to ``descend'' to an energy at which their characteristic emission
is in the observer's radio band. At the start of the afterglow, when
equilibrium conditions have not yet been reached, this implies a
dearth of radio emission relative to the higher-frequency bands.
This introduces a ``cumulation factor''
in Eq. (6).
Consider a fixed observed radio frequency
.
It corresponds to a time changing frequency
in the CB system.
The CB electrons preferentially emitting at this frequency (over an
unconstrained range of pitch angles) are those
whose Lorentz factor
satisfies the relation
,
in analogy to Eq. (3). To
estimate
the time
it takes an electron to decelerate from
to
,
substitute the magnetic
energy density of Eq. (1) into the electron energy loss of Eq. (10)
and integrate, to obtain
The simple way to parametrize the frequency-dependent
``cumulation effect'' is to use the expression for the total number
of electrons N(t) incorporated by the CB up to time t
(Eq. (40) of Appendix A) and to posit:
At optical and X-ray frequencies the CB is transparent and, for the spectrum
of Eq. (4), the bulk of the radiation's energy is emitted
around the bend frequency .
At such relatively high
frequencies, as illustrated in Fig. 1, absorption is
unimportant. Thus, for optical and
X-ray afterglows (DDD 2001) it suffices to know that all of the incoming
electron's energy is reradiated, the spatial distribution of the
radiating electrons within the CB is irrelevant. But in the radio,
where absorption is important, the location of these electrons
inevitably plays a role. In the next sections
we argue that it is plausible
that the radiating electrons be close to the surface ``illuminated''
by the ISM (Sect. 6.1), and that the values of the CB's plasma frequency (Sect. 6.2)
and free-free absorption coefficient (Sect. 6.3) actually suggest that they may
be relatively close to that surface. In Sect. 6.4 we deduce the final form
of the attenuation factor in the CB model, characterized by a single parameter.
Using numerical simulations, Achterberg al. (2001) have shown that for simple geometries the bulk of highly relativistic particles encountering a collisionless shock escape before they undergo diffusive shock acceleration. In reality, the geometry of the CB, its density distribution and its magnetic field distribution are very complicated, making the fraction of the ISM electrons that penetrate inside the CB, and their distribution there, very uncertain.
Several length scales play a role in discussing the fate of an electron that
enters the CB with
.
The Larmor radius
is
,
which is independent of
for B scaling as in
Eq. (2). For our reference parameters,
km is many
orders of magnitude smaller than the CB's radius and does not play
a crucial role. The length of an electron's curled-up trajectory as
it radiatively loses energy is
or
cm for the cooling rate of Eq. (10) and an initial
.
This is only an order of
magnitude larger than the reference CB's radius
.
We have no way to estimate the typical coherence size of a CB's
magnetic domain
,
but the depth
to which an electron penetrates,
even for a relatively simple magnetic mess (
not much smaller than
)
is smaller than the CB's radius.
For
as small as
,
cm, some four orders of magnitude smaller than
.
Even this concrete value is uncertain, for it depends on the
surface magnetic field as B-3/4, and the surface B-value
may be different from that of Eq. (2), which is a volume average.
In addition to all of the above uncertainties, it is possible that a CB's illuminated working surface be turbulent, and harbour fast plasma motions, if only to establish local charge neutrality, which is disrupted as electrons and protons penetrate the CB to different depths. We conclude that the the fraction of ISM electrons that enter inside the CB may be small and the synchrotron-radiating electrons may be concentrated close to the CB's surface, as opposed to be acquiring a uniform distribution over the CB's volume.
The plasma frequency in a CB with an average free inner electron density
is:
For
the radio emission is completely damped within a typical
length
,
much smaller than the CB's radius.
At very early times,
and the Doppler-boosted value
of
falls in the low end of the observed range of radio signals,
where a sharp cutoff is not observed. We must conclude that the (small
fraction of)
radiating electrons is located in a CB surface layer whose total
electron density (dominated by the thermal electron constituency) is
smaller than our reference average value,
a one order of magnitude reduction being
comfortably sufficient to move the value
of
to a position below the currently observed frequencies.
We have explicitly checked that our
fits do not improve significantly with the inclusion of
as a free parameter: the minimization procedure always ``gets rid''
of the fit
by choosing it somewhat below the reference value of
Eq. (19), and below the lowest measured frequencies.
At the MHz frequencies in the CB system corresponding to
the observed radio frequencies, the
synchrotron emission is strongly attenuated by free-free absorption
(inverse bremsstrahlung) in the CB; free-free absorption dominates over self-synchrotron absorption, as shown in Appendix D. For a
hydrogenic plasma, the free-free
absorption coefficient at radio frequencies is:
The opacity
of a surface layer of depth D is:
The conclusion is that a reasonable deviation of the properties
of the CB from their reference bulk average values (a reduction
of the total number-density of free electrons in
a synchrotron-emitting surface layer) implies, not only that the
plasma-frequency break is not observable in the current data, but also
that the magnitude of the free-free attenuation is the required one.
Our ignorance of the depth, temperature and density of ions and
electrons in the radio-emitting surface of a CB can be absorbed into
a single parameter: a characteristic absorption frequency,
,
in the opacity of
Eqs. (20)-(22):
We do not know a priori the geometry of the working surface from which a CB's synchrotron radiation is emitted. In the case of optical AGs this is immaterial, for the CB is transparent to radiation at the corresponding CB-system wavelengths: the bulk of the radiation energy is emitted at these frequencies. For the case of radio AGs, attenuation is important and the shape of the emitting surface layers plays a role: the expression for attenuation as a function of opacity is geometry-dependent.
For a planar-slab geometry, the familiar expression for the attenuation is:
For the sake of definiteness, we adhere to CBs that are spherical in their rest system. This means that, as the frequencies increase and the CB evolves from being opaque to being transparent, we should use an attenuation evolving from Eq. (25) to Eq. (24). Rather than doing that, we have checked explicitly that our results are insensitive to the use of one or the other form, and used the simpler one.
Consider a spherical CB in its rest system. It is ``illuminated'' by
incoming ISM electrons only in its ``front'' hemisphere. If observed
at an angle
,
a fraction of the ``dark'' CB
is also exposed to the observer, like the Moon in phases other than
totality. For radio waves - to which the CB is not transparent - these
geometrical facts play a non-trivial role.
Place the direction of the CB motion, or of its illumination, at
;
at a direction
in Cartesian
coordinates. The normal to a sphere's surface point at
is
.
The observer is in the direction
,
where we have taken
the liberty to label ``
'' what in this parametrization is
an azimuthal angle; the corresponding
unit vector is
.
The relation between
and the terrestrial observer's
viewing angle is that of Eq. (7).
When attenuation plays a significant role, an element of a CB's
surface reemits an amount of energy proportional to the cosine of
the illumination angle:
.
Because of the limb-darkening effect, the reemitted radiation
depends on the cosine of the angle between the surface element
and the observer:
.
A simple characterization of the functional form of the limb darkening effect
(see e.g. Shu 1991) is:
For negligible self-attenuation ,
as in the optical,
there is no limb darkening and illumination effect. As absorption
becomes increasingly important for longer wavelengths, the
effect becomes fully relevant. We interpolate between these two
extremes by writing:
In practice, it is not an effortless task to test a prediction for an AG's spectrum extending, as in the upper panel of Fig. 1, to all measured wavelengths from radio to X-rays. The problem is not related to the model, but to the data. First, the corrections due to absorption, particularly in the host galaxy, are frequency-dependent and notoriously difficult to ascertain with confidence. Second, the integration times employed in the radio observations are long, so that the theoretical prediction varies within the time window, and so do the optical energy flux densities, measured over much shorter periods, as well as some of the radio observations themselves. Unavoidably, this will make our spectral figures look a bit peculiar, with two theoretical curves bracketing the expectations, and various observational points at the same frequency.
We study the AG light-curves and broad-band spectra of all
GRBs with known-redshift whose AG was measured both in the
radio and optical bands.
Our predictions are given by Eq. (8),
fit to the optical and radio observations.
The fitted parameters are the overall
normalization, ,
,
the
deceleration parameter
(whose meaning and role are
reviewed in Appendix A) and the CB self absorption frequency
of
Eq. (23). We found in DDD 2001 that p is very narrowly
distributed around its theoretical value p=2.2, and we
fix it to that value for all GRBs in the current analysis.
Thus, the total number of parameters in our broad-band fits
is the same as we used in
DDD 2001 to describe just the R-band light-curve.
The values of the parameters, listed in Table 3, are very similar
to those deduced in DDD
2001 by fitting only the R-band optical data with the high-
limit of
Eq. (8). The small differences are due
not only to the use of radio data and optical bands other than R,
but also to the inclusion of the effects of the injection bend in the CB
synchrotron AG global formula, Eq. (8), and (to a small
extent) to the use of a fixed p=2.2. The results show that the theory
agrees with observations both at radio and optical wavelengths.
For some GRBs a slightly
better fit to the radio data is obtained if the absorption frequency
is best fitted to the radio data alone or if a fitted power-law
dependence on time is used for the CB opacity instead of
Eq. (23), with all other parameters taken from the global fit.
Because of scintillations, and of the very detail-dependent character of our
prediction for the time dependence of a CB's opacity,
it is difficult to assess whether or not
the slightly improved
values are significant or not.
Notice in Table 3 that the distributions of parameters are fairly
narrow, in particular for .
Of particular interest, since
it can be predicted, is the distribution in
.
Since AGs are discovered at optical and X-ray frequencies,
the angular distribution is that of the high frequency limit of
Eq. (8). For small
,
.
This distribution has a maximum at
and a median at
0.5. In Table 3 there are four cases
with
below the median and five above. The
worst ``outlier'' in
is much less so in
.
The conclusion that this distribution is perfectly compatible
with the expectation can also be reached from Fig. 39 of
DDD 2001, whose results were obtained from only
optical data, but for which the statistics is a bit better.
We first discuss the broad-band spectra and light curves of three representative GRBs: 000301c, 000926 and 991216. The optical AG of GRB 000301c is practically unextinct, that of GRB 000926 has strong extinction in the host galaxy (e.g., Fynbo et al. 2001) and that of GRB 991216 has strong extinction both in the host galaxy and in ours (e.g., Halpern et al. 2000). We discuss GRBs 991208, 000418, 000510, 990123 and 970508 in slightly less detail. The apparently special case of GRB 980425 is discussed separately in the next chapter.
For this GRB we fit the radio data of Berger et al. (2000)
and the optical data of Garnavich et al. (2000b), Jensen et al.
(2001), Masetti et al. (2000), Rhoads & Fruchter (2001) and
Sagar et al. (2001). Our results for the light curves at all observed
optical and radio frequencies are gathered in Fig. 5,
which is representative of the trends seen in all GRBs.
The narrowly spaced lines in the figure are the optical light curves
for - from top to bottom - the K, J, I, R, V, B and U bands.
Their very satisfactory comparison with data is reported in
Fig. 6. The results for the
radio AG are the more spaced lines in Fig. 5, which
correspond - from top to bottom at the figure's left side - to
frequencies of 1.43, 4.86, 8.46, 15, 22.5, 100, 250 and 350 GHz.
Their very satisfactory comparison with observations is reported
in Figs. 7 to 10. Notice that all
features of the
data have precisely the trends summarized in Fig. 5.
In Figs. 11 and 12 we present the
complementary information, by comparing
our fits with the observations for the radio-to-optical spectra
of GRB 000301c in four radio time-integration brackets;
1 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 20, and 20 to 30 days.
The pronounced peaks are at (observer's) frequencies
for which the opacity of Eq. (23) is
.
The injection bend at a higher
frequency is clearly visible, it is responsible for the agreement
between the radio and optical magnitudes and frequency trends.
The two curves in these figures, and many later ones, refer to the
expectation at the two times which bracket the actual radio observation.
The results are quite satisfactory.
![]() |
Figure 5: Results of a fit to radio and optical observations of the light curves of GRB 000301c. The narrowly spaced lines refer - from top to bottom - to the K, J, I, R, V, B and U bands. The more widely spaced lines refer - from top to bottom at the figure's left side - to frequencies of 1.43, 4.86, 8.46, 15, 22.5, 100, 250 and 350 GHz. The comparison with data is shown in Figs. 6 to 12. |
Open with DEXTER |
We have made a global fit to the NIR/optical data (Di Paola et al. 2000; Fynbo et al. 2001, Harrison et al. 2001; Price et al. 2001; Sagar et al. 2001) and the radio data (Harrison et al. 2001) on this GRB. In Fig. 13 we compare the fitted CB-model predictions with the measured light curves for the I, R, V, B and U bands, after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contributions (DDD 2001). The theoretical predictions were corrected for galactic extinction E(B - V)=0.0235 (Schlegel et al. 1998) and for the estimated extinction in the host galaxy, E(B - V)=0.40 (Harrison et al. 2001). In Figs. 14 to 16 we present the radio light curves for six frequencies ranging from 98.48 to 1.43 GHz.
In Figs. 17 to 19 we make the complementary comparison of theory and observations for the radio-to-optical spectra, in six time intervals extending from 0.8 to 100 days. The results, in spite of the crude estimate of extinction in the host galaxy and the scintillations so clearly visible in the radio light curves, are satisfactory.
The NIR/optical data for this GRB are from Halpern et al. (2000) and Garnavich et al. (2000a); the radio data from Frail et al. (2000b). In Fig. 20 we present the comparison between the measured light curves for the K, J, I, R bands, after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contributions (DDD 2001), and the fitted CB model predictions. The predictions were corrected for extinction in the host galaxy and ours, as estimated by Halpern et al. (2000): E(B - V)=0.40. In Figs. 21 to 23 we present the radio light curves at six frequencies from 350 to 1.43 GHz. In Figs. 24 to 26 we make the complementary comparison of theory and observations for the radio to optical spectra, in six time intervals extending from 0.44 to 80 days. The results are once again satisfactory.
We fit the NIR/optical data (Castro-Tirado et al. 2001; Sagar et al. 2000) and the radio data (Galama et al. 2000) on the AG of GRB 991208. In Fig. 27 we present the comparison between the measured light curves for the I, R, V and B bands, and the fitted CB model predictions, after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contributions (DDD 2001). The theoretical predictions were corrected only for the small galactic extinction E(B - V)=0.016 (Schlegel et al. 1998) in the direction of this GRB, there being no spectral evidence for optical extinction in the host galaxy. In Figs. 28 to 31 we also present the radio light curves at 100, 86.14, 30, 22.49, 14.97, 8.46, 4.86 and 1.43 GHz. In Figs. 32 and 33 we make the complementary comparison for the radio to optical spectra in three time intervals extending from 2 to 14.3 days. The results are satisfactory.
The NIR/optical data are from Klose et al. (2000) and the radio data from Berger et al. (2001a). In Fig. 34 we compare the fitted CB-model predictions with the measured light curves for the R-band, after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contribution (DDD 2001). The theoretical predictions were corrected for galactic extinction and for extinction in the host galaxy as estimated by Berger et al. (2001a): E(B - V)=0.40. In Figs. 35 and 36 we also present the radio light curves at 22.5, 15, 8.46 and 4.86 GHz. In Fig. 37 we make the complementary comparison for the radio to optical spectra, in two time intervals extending from 9.5 to 100 days. The results are satisfactory.
The NIR/optical data were gathered by Beuermann et al. (1999), Harrison et al. (1999) and Stanek et al. (1999) and the radio data by Harrison et al. (1999). In Fig. 38 we present the comparison between the measured light curves for the I, R, V, B bands, after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contribution (DDD 2001), and the fitted CB model predictions, corrected for Galactic extinction ( E(B - V)=0.203, Schlegel et al. 1998) and for extinction in the host galaxy as estimated by Stanek et al. (1999). In Figs. 39 and 40 we present the radio light curves at 13.7, 8.6 and 4.8 GHz. In Figs. 40 and 41 we also make the complementary comparison of theory and observations for the radio to optical spectra three time intervals extending from 1 to 40 days. The agreement between theory and observations is very good although its significance is limited by the sparse radio data.
We have fit the NIR/optical data (Castro Tirado 1999; Fruchter et al. 1999;
Galama et al. 1999; Holland et al. 2000; Kulkarni et al. 1999a)
and the radio data (Galama et al. 1999; Kulkarni et al. 1999b)
for this GRB. In Fig. 42 we present the comparison between
the fitted CB model predictions - assuming a constant ISM density after 0.1
observer's days and after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contributions -
with the measured light curves for the K, I, R, V, B and U bands.
The theoretical predictions were corrected for the small Galactic extinction
in the GRB direction (
E(B - V)=0.016, Schlegel et al. 1998) but not for
extinction in the host
galaxy, since there is no spectral evidence for significant extinction
there. In Fig. 43 we present the radio light curves at
15 and 8.46 GHz. In Figs. 44 to 45 we make the complementary comparison of theory and
observations for the radio to optical spectra,
in four time intervals extending from 0.1 to 20 days.
The agreement between theory and observations is good despite
the limited available data on the radio AG and its
modulation by scintillations.
The optical (and X-ray) AG of GRB 970508 is the only one so far that has
been seen to rise and fall very significantly (e.g.,
Garcia et al. 1998; Galama et al. 1998b; Pedersen et al. 1998;
Schaefer et al. 1997; Sokolov et al. 1998; Zharikov et al. 1998). In DDD
2001 we have shown
that a CB model fit to this AG fails, if one assumes - like in all our other
fits - a constant ISM density. However, we have argued there that GRB
progenitors are presumably located in super-bubbles of 0.1 to 0.5 kpc
size. There may be instances in which the jet of CBs, after travelling for
such a distance, does not continue onwards to a similarly low-density halo
region, but encounters a higher-density domain. Indeed, we have shown that
a fairly satisfactory fit to the optical (and X-ray) AG is obtained
upon assuming an upwards jump in density by a factor
2.2 at
day after burst.
This jump occurs before the first available
data points on the radio AG (Galama et al. 1998a; Frail et al. 2000b).
Therefore, we have fitted the optical data and the radio data
with the ISM density profile that was fitted
to the R-band light curve.
In Fig. 46 we present the comparison between the measured light curve for the I, R, V and B bands after subtraction of the host galaxy and SN contribution (DDD 2001). The theoretical predictions were corrected for the small galactic extinction in the GRB direction ( E(B - V)=0.016, Schlegel et al. 1998) but not for extinction in the host galaxy, since there is no spectral evidence for significant extinction there. In Figs. 47 and 48 we also present the radio light curves at 8.46, 4.86 and 1.43 GHz. In Figs. 48 to 50 we make the complementary comparison of theory and observations for the radio to optical spectra, in five time intervals extending from 0.12 to 470 days. The results are quite satisfactory.
In DDD 2001 we demonstrated that, in the CB model, the spectral index
in the optical to X-ray domain could be extracted from the
time-dependence of the optical
light curves. The fits resulted in
for
all GRBs of known redshift. This result is in good agreement
with the observed late spectral observations.
We have learned in this section that the CB model also provides an
excellent description of the AG spectra in the broader band that
includes the radio data. Only one new parameter,
,
is
involved in the extension to the broader band. And this fitted
parameter and the injection bend - at its predicted frequency and
time-dependent position - bring about
the agreement between the different magnitudes and spectral trends
of the radio and optical domains.
In some of our fits to broad band spectra, such as the earliest data on GRBs 000301c, 991216 and 990123 in the upper panels of Figs. 11, 24 and 44, respectively, the theoretical curve is an underestimate of the low-energy spectral intensity. In other cases, such as GRBs 000926, 991208 and 980425, the spectral fits are excellent at all times. The lowest frequencies and earliest times are the most dependent on our simplifications concerning the GRB geometry, density profile, self-absorption, cumulation and limb-darkening. We would have been surprised if these simplifications worked even better than they do, and the fits do improve if we remove our approximation of a fixed spectral index p=2.2. But our aim in this paper is not to obtain spectacularly good fits, but to demonstrate that, even in the simplest approximations, the CB model provides a good description of the broad-band data. The analysis of the lowest radio frequencies at the earliest times brings forth a plethora of details that are not of fundamental interest: our ultimate goal is not to understand these details, but to investigate what the origin of GRBs actually is.
Like its accompanying GRB,
SN1998bw was also claimed to be a very peculiar radio supernova
(e.g. Kulkarni et al. 1998). Over the past twenty years approximately two
dozen SNe have been detected in the radio: 2
Type Ib, 5 Type Ic, and the rest Type II. A much larger list of
more than 100 additional SNe have low radio upper limits (for a
review see, e.g., Weiler et al. 2000 and references therein). Type Ib/c
SNe are fairly homogeneous in their radio properties, but
SN1998bw had a peak 6-cm radio luminosity of
,
that is 20 to 40 times brighter than other
radio Type Ib/c SNe, which fall typically in the range
.
SN1998bw also reached a high radio
luminosity earlier than any known SN. Simple arguments based on the
brightness temperature of its radio luminosity (e.g., Readhead 1994)
required the radiosphere of SN1998bw to have expanded surprisingly
fast, at
,
at least during the first few days.
Its unusually high optical and radio luminosities and its extraordinarily
large initial speed of expansion led many authors to conclude that
SN1999bw was a hypernova (Paczynski 1998) rather than a
peculiar supernova (e.g., Iwamoto et al. 1998).
In the CB model (Dar & De Rújula 2000a), the
gamma-ray fluence of GRBs
at large viewing angle (
)
is
.
The radio AG spectral energy density is proportional to
,
as implied by
Eqs. (4), (6), (8), the
dependence
and the
relation
.
As a function of time, the AG peaks when
,
so that
and the
peak value is proportional to
.
Because its proximity and large viewing angle ``conspired'' to make
GRB 980425 appear ``normal'' in gamma rays, its peak radio intensity
should have been enhanced by a factor
relative to that of ordinary GRBs. Thus, for
mrad, as estimated for GRB 980425 in Dar & De Rújula (2001), its expected
peak radio intensity is
60 times larger than that of
ordinary GRBs. Observationally, it is 50 to 100 times larger.
In Figs. 51 to 55
we show our CB model fits to the
temporal and spectral behaviour of the radio afterglow of GRB 980425.
The fit parameters (in particular the large observation angle )
are quite close to the ones
that explain its GRB fluence (Dar & De Rújula 2000a), and its
X-ray afterglow (DDD 2001). These figures show
how, in the CB model, the radio AG of GRB 980425 also has a ``normal''
magnitude and shape.
That is, once more, if the radio AG is produced by the CBs and
not by the SN, unlike, once again, it is generally assumed (e.g.,
Kulkarni et al. 1998; Li & Chevalier; Weiler et al. 2000).
In the case of GRB 980425 the relatively large viewing angle
and the subsequently small Doppler factor imply that, at
late times, even the radio frequencies are above the injection bend.
The large
behaviour in Figs. 53 to 55
is
.
Also, the late time
trend of the radio light curves in Figs. 51 and 52 approaches the asymptotic
.
For GRB 980425 the
radio data are overwhelmingly more abundant and precise than
the X-ray data, and it is interesting to check what the prediction
for the X-ray light curve is, if the input parameters are those
determined in the radio fits. This is done in Fig. 56
for two values of the electron spectral index p. For our
fixed choice, p=2.2, the prediction misses the data by a
factor 20. There are two excuses for that. First, since GRB
980425 is seen much more ``sideways'' than other GRBs, and its
Doppler factor
is much smaller than usual, the cumulation,
illumination and limb-darkening factors play a bigger role than
usual. These factors involve many simplifying assumptions (such as
spherical symmetry) and significantly affect the normalization of
the radio AG, but not that of the X-rays. Second, the extrapolation
from radio to X-rays is over some 10 orders of magnitude in frequency,
and a small change in the spectral photon's slope, (p - 1)/2,
entails a very large change in relative magnitude, as can be seen
in Fig. 56 by comparing the p=2.2 and p=2curves.
![]() |
Figure 56: The X-ray afterglow of GRB 980425. |
Open with DEXTER |
The X-ray light-curve of GRB 980245 is essentially flat in the time-interval of the first four observed points (Pian et al. 2000), while the corresponding data for all other GRBs fall with time much faster. The last observational point in Fig. 56, a preliminary result from XXM Newton (Pian 2002) and Chandra (Kouveliotou 2002), falls precisely in the expected subsequent fast decline (predicted in DDD 2001) and definitely not in a naive power-law extrapolation. The peculiar light curve is a consequence of the large observing angle (Dar & De Rújula 2000a). For the reasons stated in this paragraph and the preceding one, we consider the prediction of the X-ray fluence completely satisfactory.
In DDD 2001, on the basis of the very meager X-ray data, we argued
that the last optically-measured point of the SN1998bw/GRB 980425
pair, at day 778 (Fynbo et al. 2000), was due to the CB's AG and
not to the supernova. Redoing the analysis with the input of the
abundant radio data, we must now revise this conclusion. In
Fig. 55 we show the result, with inclusion of the
late optical measurement. This point lies more than two orders
of magnitude above the predicted CB's AG: it must be due to the
SN. We do not have an explanation - specific to the CB-model -
of the fact that this point also lies somewhat above the expectation
based on
decay (Sollerman et al. 2000).
We are claiming that long duration GRBs are associated with a good fraction of core-collapse SNe. Yet, SN1998bw was one of the brightest in its class. The apparent contradiction may be dispelled by the increasing evidence that SN explosions are fairly asymmetric. It is quite conceivable that, viewed very close to their ``CB axis'' SNe appear to be brighter than when observed from other directions.
The conclusion is twofold. GRB 980425 is, in every respect,
normal (z and
being chance variables). And, deprived
of very abnormal X-ray and radio outputs - which are not due to
the supernova, but to its ancillary GRB - SN1998bw loses most of
its ``peculiarity''.
The transverse projected velocity in the sky of a CB relative
to its parent SN is, for large
and small
:
![]() |
Figure 57: The predicted angular separation of SN1998bw and GRB 980425, in milliarcseconds, as a function of time. |
Open with DEXTER |
The most accurate determination of the position in the sky of the
SN1998bw/GRB 980425 system is based on the radio observations made
with the Australian Telescope Compact Array (ATCA, Wieringa et al.
1998). Recall that in the CB model the radio coordinates are those
of the CB (GRB 980425 was a single-pulse GRB, that is, it had a
single dominant CB). In days 3, 4 and 10 the source is reported to
be at (RA 19:35:03.31, Dec -52:50:44.7). In the subsequent 33
observations, ranging from day 12 to day 790, the position is (RA
19:35:03.32, Dec -52:50:44.8), some
away from the original determination,
but not inconsistent with the observational uncertainty of
.
In the penultimate observation at day
320 the source has faded to the point that it is not observable in
2 out of 6 frequencies, and in the last observation at date 790
there is no clear sighting at any frequency.
The predicted values of
from Eq. (30) at some relevant dates are 12, 158,
183 and 292 mas at days 12, 249, 320 and 790, respectively. These
results, the observational error, and the fact that the ATCA
observers were not trying to follow the source's motion imply that
their results are insufficient to claim either that the early change
of position was significant, or that a motion of the CB comparable
to the predicted one is excluded.
Observations of the vicinity of the source of GRB 980425 were made
with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) at day 778 (Fynbo et al.
2000), with a tiny astrometric uncertainty of
,
and
pointing at ATCA's first reported coordinates. The observations
are compatible with SN1998bw lying at that point, and reveal six
other objects in a (
)
field centered
there. As a result of our CB model fit to the radio data, as we have
explained, we expect the optical observations to correspond to
SN1998bw, and there it is, at the field's center. We also expect,
as in Fig. 55, the CB to be more than two orders of
magnitude fainter: not observable. It would be nice if this
conclusion was wrong, that is, if the large ``naive'' extrapolation
from radio to optical frequencies in Fig. 55 was an
underestimate by a considerable factor, which is the case for the
larger extrapolation from optical to X-ray frequencies in
Fig. 56 (the ``naive'' prediction there is the one labelled
p=2.2). In that case, it may be that a subsequent observation
of the same field reveals that one of the closer-by extra sources
has faded away! Three of these sources are
away from the SN, if one of them is the CB, and it is dimming, we
would not excessively mind that this is
60% more distant
than the prediction in Fig. 57, based on a
constant-density approximation for the ISM.
The values of the CB model parameters that were fitted to the broad band
data on GRBs with known redshift - and are listed in Table 3 - are
narrowly distributed around their reference values, except
for the overall normalization which is much smaller than originally
anticipated if .
This normalization ``problem'' may point to inaccuracies in the
various hypothesis that we have made. One example
is the contention that all of the incident energy of the ISM electrons
is radiated in the CB. It may well be
that the moving CB deflects and scatters the ISM electrons
before they radiate a large fraction of their acquired energy,
as suggested by the results of the numerical simulations of Achterberg et al. (2001).
But abandoning some of our simplifications would be premature. Indeed,
in concluding that in the CB model the normalization of the AGs is more than
one order of magnitude too large, we have used our reference parameters
to compute the expected values. And there is sufficient elasticity
in these parameters to obtain a consistent overall picture of all GRB
properties, as we proceed to review and discuss.
With the current analysis of GRB radio AGs we have completed a first round of the study of GRB properties in the CB model, and it behooves us to look back at the various constraints on the relevant parameters.
In Dar & De Rújula (2000a) we followed Dar (1998) and Dar &
Plaga (1999) in suggesting that the large peculiar velocities of
neutron stars may be due to a ``natal kick'', induced by a momentum
imbalance in the oppositely-directed jets of CBs accompanying
their birth. On this basis we chose as a reference value
erg, for a jet with a reference
number of CBs (or prominent peaks in the GRB light-curve)
.
Based on a first
analysis of AG properties, and of GRB
-ray fluences and
individual
-ray energies, we set
as a reference value.
In Dar & De Rújula (2000b) we investigated two extreme
models meant to bracket the behaviour of a CB as it
crosses a SN shell or its progenitor's ``wind", is heated by the collision with
its constituents, and emits observable -rays as
it reaches the shell's transparent outskirts with a
radius
,
proportional to its early
transverse expansion velocity
,
which we assumed to be close to the sound speed in
a relativistic plasma,
.
In our
``surface'' model, which is no doubt closer to a realistic
description, the energy of the GRB in
-rays
is proportional to
.
(Eq. (45) of Dar & De Rújula 2000b).
For the chosen reference parameters, in the surface model,
this prediction overestimates the GRB fluences by about
one order of magnitude. Since the individual
-ray
energies corroborate the choice
,
this
means that
(and
)
are overestimated by roughly one order of
magnitude
.
In Dar & De Rújula (2001) we analyzed the X-ray ``Fe'' lines
observed in the AGs of some GRBs, which we attributed to
hydrogen recombination in the CBs, with the corresponding
Lyman-
lines
boosted by a large factor
.
We equated
the total number of photons in the lines to the baryon number
of the jet of CBs, and found agreement with the baryon
number in the jet,
,
to within one
order of magnitude. But in the current investigation,
we have found that the absorption of radio waves keeps the
CBs hot and ionized (Appendices C and E). This means
that our reference value of
is likely
to be an overestimate.
In DDD 2001 we proposed a mechanism that would quench the
expansion of a CB in minutes of observer's time, well
after it has exited the SN shell. The CBs reach an asymptotic
radius (Eq. (16) of DDD 2001):
Both the GRB fluence and the AG fluence are, in the CB-model,
,
with
for the
rays and
for the AG. At a value of
fixed by the fit to the AG's temporal behaviour, the AG
fluence is:
The precise location of the injection bend is
not predictable and a modification by up to
one order of magnitude of its position has
a small effect on the quality of the fits
to observations. An increase of the cooling
break frequency
implies a
corresponding decrease in AG flux, see Eq. (4),
adding to the uncertainty in the prediction
of the precise overall normalization.
To summarize, the CB model correctly describes, in terms of a very limited set of parameters, the properties of GRBs and their AGs, including their normalizations. This is the case even if we adhere to all of the detailed assumptions we have made, even though they are approximations to a no doubt fairly convoluted physical problem.
Similar variations have not been seen in the optical and X-ray bands. The intensity variations of GRB radio AGs are very reminiscent of the ones seen in radio signals from pulsars in our galaxy, interpreted as scintillations due to the motion of the line of sight through the refractive, diffractive and dispersive ISM of the Galaxy (see, e.g., Lyne & Smith 1982). Some very compact active galactic nuclei also show an intraday variability that has been the subject of much debate (e.g., Wagner & Witzel 1995 and references therein). At least in one case - the variations in the radio intensity of the quasar J1819+3845, the most extremely variable AGN known at radio wavelengths (Dennett-Thorpe & de Bruyn 2000) - it was shown unambiguously that the variations are scintillations caused by the ISM (Dennet-Thorpe & Bruyn 2002).
The (de)coherence properties in time and frequency
of the radio scintillations have been used to measure the
transverse speed of pulsars (e.g., Lyne & Smith 1982).
Gupta (1995) has demonstrated for a sample of 59 pulsars that their
transverse speed,
,
measured from their inter-stellar
scintillations, agrees well with their transverse speed,
,
measured from their proper motion (see also Nicastro et al. 2001).
The movement of the line of sight to pulsars is in most cases dominated
by their proper motion at a transverse velocity
larger than the turbulent speeds in the ISM, or of the
sun relative to the ISM, or of the Earth around the sun.
The mean
of Gupta's 59 pulsars is 311
and their mean distance is estimated to be 1.96 kpc.
Their angular speeds are within an order of magnitude of a central value:
The deviations from a smooth behaviour of the radio signals in the case of
GRB 980425, as can be seen in Figs. 51, 52,
are chromatic, but correlated in time over a much longer period than for
the other GRBs. Because GRB 980425 is so close (z=0.0085) and is
viewed at the unusually large angle of 8 mrad (Table 3 and DDD
2001), its apparent angular velocity, Eq. (35), is much larger
than for other GRBs. The line of sight to this GRB swept a much bigger
region of galactic ISM than for other GRBs or, for that matter, pulsars.
Thus, we have no independent information on the ISM irregularities causing
scintillations on this large scale.
The analysis of CB scintillations could result in a measurement of their hyperluminal speeds and a decisive test of the cannonball model (fireballs do not have relativistic proper motions, firecones stop moving close to their progenitors and, unlike CBs, have an increasing size that should rapidly quench their scintillations with time). The presently available information (or the current information in its published form) is insufficient for us to attempt at the moment to extract conclusions about CB hyperluminal velocities from the observed scintillation patterns in the radio AG of GRBs.
The Cannonball model gives an excellent and extremely simple description of all measured properties of GRB afterglows, including their radio afterglows.
In the CB model, there is an injection bend in the spectrum,
at the predicted time-dependent frequency
of Eq. (14).
We have shown that the evidence for the correctness of this
prediction is very strong, see Table 2 and
Figs. 3 and 4.
It is this spectral bend that governs the relative normalization
of the radio and the optical AG, again in agreement with observation,
as shown in all our figures of AG wide-band spectra.
Since we have always set the electron index to its theoretical
value, p=2.2, just three intrinsic parameters
are needed to describe an optical or X-ray AG:
,
and the normalization; the viewing
angle
,
although it must also be fit, is external to the GRB, like
the redshift and the absorption in the host and in the Galaxy are.
We have shown that, in the CB model, the extension of these results
to the radio domain
requires the introduction of just one extra parameter: the
free-free absorption frequency
of Eq. (23),
and that, in spite of various approximations,
this simplest of descriptions is at the moment entirely satisfactory.
Notice that what one has to parametrize is a two
dimensional surface: the fluence as a function of frequency and
time. The shape of this surface is that of a relatively simple
``mountain'', various cuts of which at fixed
or
are shown if Fig. 1. It would be easy, and it may well
be misleading, to overparametrize this rather
featureless surface with more than a few parameters.
It is instructive to compare, or so Occam would have
thought, the understanding of wide-band AG spectra in the CB model
with that in the fireball or firetrumpet models.
In the latter, the number of intrinsic parameters varies:
seven (e.g. Berger et al. 2001a), eight (e.g. Yost et al. 2001)
nine (e.g. Yost et al. 2002) and even thirteen (e.g. Galama et al. 2000).
This counting does not include the viewing angle, since
the firetrumpets in these works point precisely at the
observer.
Moreover, even before the ``break'' in the time-evolution
- a period during which it is not inconsistent to use the
quasi-spherical self-similar approximation of Blandford & McKee
(1976) for the expanding material - the ordering of the ``breaks''
in frequency implies a multiple choice of spectral shapes
and of their evolution (Granot & Sari 2002).
Countrary to established custom, we are not presenting the values of our fits, which are generally reasonable and would become
quite good if, again following the consuetudinary path, we artificially
increased the errors to compensate for scintillations in the radio
data and/or uncertainties in attenuation. The reason is that the
CB model is a very simplified description of a no doubt very
complicated reality (e.g. CBs could be somewhat comet-like, as
opposed to spherical, their inner distributions of density,
ionization, magnetic field and temperature could be non-trivial,
even chaotic, etc.). Even when the physics is much simpler
than in the analysis of radio emissions, and the fits are very good
- as is the case in our description of optical and X-ray AGs in
DDD 2001 - we do not report their quite impressive
values
. We view our ``fits'' as rough descriptions,
rather than true fits. Under such circumstances, the overintrepretation
of a
test has every chance of being misleading, much more
so in models containing many more parameters than the CB model.
For the same reasons,
and because of the systematic errors in the data,
the values of the parameters we extract from our fits should not
be taken entirely at face value, even though the minimization procedure
- which attributes to the errors a counterfactual purely statistical origin -
results in tiny 1
spreads for the fitted parameters, and in
values that are in most cases satisfactory.
In the radio domain, as in every other aspect, the pair SN1998bw/GRB 980425 is particularly fascinating. On the basis of this GRB's observed fluence and distance, and given the (totally trivial but all important) dependence of the fluence on observation angle, we claimed in Dar & De Rújula (2000a) that the only peculiarity of this pair was that it was observed uncharacteristically far from its axis (for a GRB) and uncharacteristically close to it (for a SN). In DDD 2001 we proved that the X-ray AG of GRB 980245 was also what is expected in the CB model, depriving the supernova of its X-ray peculiarity: it did not make the observed X-rays. In this paper, by understanding the magnitude, time- and frequency-dependence of the pair's radio signals - which were not emitted, either, by the SN - we have demonstrated that SN1998bw was also ``radio normal''. Neither this GRB, nor its SN have - in the CB model - anything in particular, except the chance occurrences of the distance and observation angle. Alas, the unique occasion to make a fundamental discovery by actually resolving the SN and the CB, as proposed in Dar & De Rújula (2000a), may now be very difficult, but, as we have explained, not entirely out of the question.
By pure coincidence, the apparent angular velocities of galactic pulsars and cosmological cannonballs are of the same order of magnitude. The analysis of radio scintillations, one of the methods used to measure pulsars velocities, should also be applicable to the GRB ejecta. Thus, it ought to be possible to test the CB-model's prediction of hyperluminal cannonball velocities.
We review the functional form of
the time dependent Lorentz factor ,
which
is explicit and analytical in a fair approximation (DDD 2001).
In minutes of observer's time, CBs reach a roughly constant radius
and
are parsecs away from their progenitor star,
a domain where a constant-density ISM may be a reasonable approximation.
Relativistic energy-momentum conservation in the progenitor's
rest frame results in the equation governing the deceleration
of a CB in the ISM:
Use the relation
between the
times measured in the supernova and CB rest frames,
divide both sides of the Eq. (36) by
and
integrate to obtain the relation:
It is important to know the number of electrons accumulated
by a CB as its Lorentz factor decreases from
to
(in the
approximation ne=np of a Hydrogenic ISM
this number equals that of scattered or incorporated protons).
The number rate of accumulation is related to the energy-loss rate of
Eq. (36) so that:
We argue that the conventional synchrotron spectral break occurs at a very non-relativistic electron energy. The corresponding break in the radio spectrum is unobservable.
In writing the electron energy-loss rate Eq. (10), we have
assumed that synchrotron radiation, which is quadratic in energy,
dominates (inverse Compton scattering has the same energy dependence,
but it is negligible, since
the magnetic energy density within a CB is much higher than
the radiation energy density). The general result for the energy loss of
high-energy electrons is of the form:
The spectral index of high energy electrons injected with a power-law
spectrum steepens by one unit at a ``cooling break'' energy
.
For
and the reference values of
and ne,
the synchrotron cooling break is at a subrelativistic energy
(
). This is in
contrast with the injection bend at the highly relativistic energy
The synchrotron radiation of electrons below the cooling break
is, for the current data, at unobservably low observer's radio frequencies.
We argue that the synchrotron radiation in a CB is intense
enough to maintain its plasma partially ionized with ion and
free electron densities proportional to .
The bound-free cross section for photoionization of atomic hydrogen in its nth excited state by photons with frequency above the ionization
threshold,
,
is given by
,
with
cm2 (
cm
is the Bohr radius
and
is the Gaunt factor
for photoabsorption by hydrogen).
For the surface flux of photons of Eq. (6), we obtain
an ionization rate of the nth level of atomic hydrogen:
The recombination rate per unit volume
of hydrogen in an hydrogenic CB is (Osterbrock
1989):
We argue that the self-attenuation in the CB of the observed radio waves is dominated by free-free absorption.
In the rest system of a CB, the ISM electrons arrive at a rate
A fraction
of their energy,
is
synchrotron
re-radiated. Let
be the density of the emitting
electrons, so that:
The temperature of the partially ionized CB is of
eV and almost constant during the observed AG. For
20 MHz
emission from a thermal plasma at such temperature,
and for one tenth of the typical bulk CB density,
,
one obtains from Eq. (20)
,
which is
larger than the synchrotron absorption coefficient of
the energetic electrons in the CB (the values of
are listed
in Table 3). At a fixed observer frequency,
,
the free-free opacity of the CB decreases roughly
like
compared with the
t-1.1 decline of the synchrotron self opacity.
The conclusion is that free-free absorption is dominant for as long as the ionization of the CB is considerable.
We argue that the energy of the self absorbed radio waves and
ionizing photons in the CB is radiated mainly by thermal bremsstrahlung
and line emission from the CB contributing significantly to the
observed X-ray afterglow.
The absorbed radio power is roughly equal to the integrated
emissivity of the CB over all frequencies below ,
defined by Eq. (23). For the spectrum of Eq. (4),
and the normalization of Eq. (5), the
absorbed power is:
![]() |
(51) |
The recombination energy is radiated at a rate
in the CB rest frame
where
is the fraction of ionized hydrogen in
the CB and
is the binding energy of hydrogen in
its ground state. In the distant observer frame, the observed radiation
is boosted and collimated by the highly relativistic motion of the CB
and redshifted by the cosmological expansion to:
Due to their large Doppler shift ,
the
hydrogen emission lines (and the emission lines from the swept up ISM and
supernova shell material) as well as the CB's thermal bremsstrahlung,
are shifted to the observer's X-ray band. They
contribute significantly to the X-ray afterglow and may provide a simple
alternative explanation (Dar & De Rújula 2000) to the commonly assumed
Fe-line origin of the X-ray lines observed in the afterglows of GRB
970508: Piro et al. (1998), GRB 970828: Yoshida et al. (1999; 2001), GRB
991216: Piro et al. (2000) and GRB 000214: Antonelli et al. (2000).
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 000301c, at z=2.033, Eq. (8) and Fig. 5, with the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and an expected (but, in this case, unobservable) SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000301c. Upper panel: the light curve at 350 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 250 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000301c. Upper panel: the light curve at 100 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 22.5 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000301c. Upper panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000301c. Upper panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 1.43 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000301c from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 1 and 5 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 5 and 10 days after burst. The highest peaking curve in the upper pannel corresponds to the later time and in the lower panel to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000301c from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 10 and 20 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 20 and 30 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed optical afterglow of GRB 000926 at z=2.037. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and an expected (but, in this case, unobservable) SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000926. Upper panel: the light curve at 98.48 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 22.5 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000926. Upper panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000926. Upper panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 1.43 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000926 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 0.8 and 1.4 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 1.4 and 2.5 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 18: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000926 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 2.5 and 4 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 4 and 8 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 19: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000926 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 8 and 20 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 20 and 100 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 20: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed optical afterglow of GRB 991216 at z=1.02. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and the expected SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. In a CB-model fit, there is in this case some evidence for such a SN (DDD 2001). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 21: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991216. Upper panel: the light curve at 350 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 100 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 22: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991216. Upper panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 23: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991216. Upper panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 1.43 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 24: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 991216 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 0.44 and 2 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 2 and 4 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 25: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 991216 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 4 and 7 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 7 and 13 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 26: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 991216 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 13 and 30 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 30 and 80 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 27: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 991208, at z=0.706, Eq. (8), with the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contribution of the underlying galaxy and associated supernova has been subtracted. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and the expected SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. In a CB-model fit, there is in this case strong evidence for such a SN (DDD 2001). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 28: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991208. Upper panel: the light curve at 100 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 86.2 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 29: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991208. Upper panel: the light curve at 30 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 22.5 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 30: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991208. Upper panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 31: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 991208. Upper panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 1.43 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 32: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 991208 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 2 and 5 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 5 and 10 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 33: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 991208 from radio to optical frequencies in the time interval between 10 and 14.3 days. The highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 34: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 000418, at z=1.118, Eq. (8), with the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and the expected SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. In a CB-model fit, there is in this case strong evidence for such a SN (DDD 2001). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 35: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000418. Upper panel: the light curve at 22.46 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 36: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 000418. Upper panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 37: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 000418 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 9.5 and 30 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 30 and 100 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 38: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 990510, at z=1.619, Eq. (8), with the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contribution of the underlying galaxy and the (in this case unobservable) associated supernova has been subtracted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 39: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 990510. Upper panel: the light curve at 13.68 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.6-8.7 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 40: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 990510. Upper panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. Lower panel: the spectrum from radio to optical frequencies in the time interval between 1 and 6 days after burst. The highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 41: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 990510 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 6 and 20 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 20 and 40 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 42: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 990123, at z=1.600, Eq. (8), and the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom) 1000 times the K-band results, 100 times the J-band, 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band, 1/100 of the B-band and 1/1000 of the U-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and an expected (but, in this case, unobservable) SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 43: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 990123. Upper panel: the light curve at 15 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 44: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 990123 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 0.1 and 1 day after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 1 and 3 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 45: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 990123 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 3 and 10 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 10 and 20 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 46: Comparisons between our fitted CB model AG of GRB 970508, at z=0.835, Eq. (8), with the observed optical data. The figure shows (from top to bottom), 10 times the I-band, the R-band, 1/10 of the V-band and 1/100 of the B-band. The contributions of the underlying galaxy and the expected SN1998bw-like SN have been subtracted. In a CB-model fit, there is in this case strong evidence for such a SN (DDD 2001). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 47: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 970508. Upper panel: the light curve at 8.46 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 4.86 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 48: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 970508. Upper panel: the light curve at 1.43 GHz. Lower panel: the spectral behaviour in the time interval between 0.12 and 6 days after burst. The highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 49: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 970508 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 6 and 20 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 20 and 40 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 50: The spectrum of the AG of GRB 970508 from radio to optical frequencies. Upper panel: in the time interval between 40 and 100 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 100 and 470 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 51: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow of GRB 980425 at z=0.0085, Eq. (8), and its observed radio afterglow. Upper panel: the light curve at 8.64 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 4.80 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 52: Comparisons between our fitted CB model afterglow, Eq. (8), and the observed radio afterglow of GRB 980425. Upper panel: the light curve at 2.49 GHz. Lower panel: the light curve at 1.38 GHz. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 53: Comparison between the observed spectrum of the AG of GRB 980425 in the radio band and the fitted CB model spectrum. Upper panel: in the time interval between 2.5 and 20 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 20 and 40 days after burst. The highest peaking curve in the upper pannel corresponds to the later time and in the lower panel to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 54: Comparison between the observed spectrum of the AG of GRB 980425 in the radio band and the fitted CB model spectrum. Upper panel: in the time interval between 40 and 70 days after burst. Lower panel: in the time interval between 70 and 150 days after burst. In both cases the highest peaking curve corresponds to the earlier time. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 55: The late spectrum of GRB 980425 in the time interval between 150 and 759 days after burst. The highest peaking line corresponds to the earlier time. The late isolated point is the last optical observation, which must correspond to SN1998bw and not to the AG of the CB of GRB 980425. |
Open with DEXTER |