next previous
Up: Are the hosts of galaxies?


Online Material

Appendix A: Absolute B magnitudes of GRB host galaxies

The dereddened R magnitudes of the GRB host galaxies with determined redshifts are given in Table .1. They were estimated in the Vega system taking account of most of the published papers and GRB Coordinates Network circulars directly or indirectly reporting on optical observations of fading GRB afterglows and their hosts. When several R magnitudes of a given source were available in the literature, the various measurements were weighted according to their photometric uncertainty, and subsequently averaged to get a final homogenized value. In some cases, we also relied on the host contribution derived from the fit of the R-band optical transient light-curve when the latter was clearly well constrained. The Rmagnitude of the GRB 990506 host galaxy was measured from an R-band image that we obtained using the EFOSC2 instrument on the ESO 3.6-m telescope at La Silla.

 

 
Table A.1: Optical (R and B-band) properties of GRB host galaxies.
    Redshift   Photometry   $M_B + 5 \log_{10} h_{65}~(\P)$
Source GRB z Ref.   $E(B-V)^{\dag }$ R mag References   (1) (2)
GRB J194641.9-193605 020813 1.25 1   0.109 24.70 $\pm$ 0.20 2   -19.30  
GRB J151455.8-192454 020531 1.00 3   0.140 22.05 $\pm$ 0.20 4   -21.35  
GRB J135803.1-312222 020405 0.69 5   0.050 20.90 $\pm$ 0.20 5   -21.50  
GRB J111518.0-215656 011211 2.14 6   0.036 24.90 $\pm$ 0.30 7   -20.55  
GRB J113429.6-760141 011121 0.36 8   0.508 24.60 $\pm$ 0.40 9   -16.15 -16.25
GRB J225559.9+405553 010921 0.45 10   0.145 21.45 $\pm$ 0.15 10, 11   -19.75 -19.95
GRB J145212.5+430106 010222 1.48 12   0.023 25.70 $\pm$ 0.15 13, 14   -18.75 -18.50
GRB J170409.7+514711 000926 2.04 15   0.024 24.80 $\pm$ 0.10 15   -20.50  
GRB J021834.5+074429 000911 1.06 16   0.120 25.10 $\pm$ 0.10 16   -18.80 -18.85
GRB J122519.3+200611 000418 1.12 17   0.033 23.80 $\pm$ 0.20 18, 19   -19.90 -19.85
GRB J162018.6+292636 000301 2.04 20   0.052 27.85 $\pm$ 0.30 21   -17.45  
GRB J015915.5-403933 000210 0.85 22   0.017 23.45 $\pm$ 0.10 22   -19.50 -19.50
GRB J050931.3+111707 991216 1.02 23   0.633 25.30 $\pm$ 0.20 24   -18.15  
GRB J163353.5+462721 991208 0.71 25   0.016 24.30 $\pm$ 0.20 25, 26   -18.30 -18.30
GRB J223153.1-732429 990712 0.43 27   0.032 21.85 $\pm$ 0.15 28, 29, 30   -19.35 -19.50
GRB J050954.5-720753 990705 0.84 31   0.122 21.80 $\pm$ 0.10 31, 32, 33   -21.65 -21.75
GRB J133807.1-802948 990510 1.62 27   0.118 27.50 $\pm$ 0.30$^\ddag $ 34   -17.20  
GRB J115450.1-264035 990506 1.31 17   0.065 25.50 $\pm$ 0.20 this work   -19.75 -19.45
GRB J152530.3+444559 990123 1.60 35   0.016 24.30 $\pm$ 0.40 26, 36, 37, 38   -20.40 -20.05
GRB J235906.7+083507 980703 0.97 39   0.058 22.40 $\pm$ 0.20 26, 40, 41, 42   -20.90 -20.80
GRB J101757.8+712725 980613 1.10 43   0.090 25.80 $\pm$ 0.10 44   -17.85 -17.90
GRB J115626.4+651200 971214 3.42 45   0.016 25.60 $\pm$ 0.20 26, 45, 46   -21.30 -21.30
GRB J180831.6+591851 970828 0.96 47   0.038 25.10 $\pm$ 0.30 47   -18.85 -18.35
GRB J065349.4+791619 970508 0.83 48   0.049 25.10 $\pm$ 0.20 26, 48, 49   -17.85 -17.75
GRB J050146.7+114654 970228 0.69 50   0.234 24.60 $\pm$ 0.20 50, 51, 52   -17.85 -17.80
Notes:
$\dag $ Foreground Galactic extinction. For all cases excepted GRB 990705, it has been estimated from the DIRBE/IRAS dust maps of Schlegel et al. (1998). For GRB 990705 which occured behind the Large Magellanic Cloud, we used the results of Dutra et al. (2001).
$\ddagger$ Derived from the V magnitude of Fruchter et al. (2000a) assuming a spectral slope $F_{\nu}
\varpropto \nu^{-1}$.
$\P$ The absolute B magnitudes were derived assuming a $\Lambda $CDM Universe with $\Omega _m=0.3$ and $\Omega _\lambda =0.7$. Column (1) gives the estimations which were obtained by applying proper k-corrections and B-R colours to the observed R magnitudes. The results given in Col. (2) were derived from the observed flux density at the redshifted B-band wavelength.


References: (1) Price et al. (2002b); (2) Levan et al. (2002); (3) Kulkarni et al. (2002); (4) Fox et al. (2002); (5) Price et al. (2002d); (6) Holland et al. (2002); (7) Burud et al. (2001); (8) Garnavich et al. (2003); (9) Bloom et al. (2002c); (10) Price et al. (2002c); (11) Park et al. (2002); (12) Jha et al. (2001); (13) Frail et al. (2002); (14) Fruchter et al. (2001a); (15) Castro et al. (2002); (16) Price et al. (2002a); (17) Bloom et al. (2002a); (18) Metzger et al. (2000); (19) Klose et al. (2000); (20) Jensen et al. (2001); (21) Fruchter & Vreeswijk (2001); (22) Piro et al. (2002); (23) Vreeswijk et al. (1999b); (24) Vreeswijk et al. (2000); (25) Castro-Tirado et al. (2001); (26) Sokolov et al. (2001); (27) Vreeswijk et al. (2001); (28) Fruchter et al. (2000b); (29) Hjorth et al. (2000); (30) Sahu et al. (2000); (31) Le Floc'h et al. (2002); (32) Saracco et al. (2001a); (33) Holland et al. (2000a); (34) Fruchter et al. (2000a); (35) Kulkarni et al. (1999); (36) Fruchter et al. (1999b); (37) Holland & Hjorth (1999); (38) Bloom et al. (1999); (39) Djorgovski et al. (1998); (40) Bloom et al. (1998b); (41) Holland et al. (2001); (42) Vreeswijk et al. (1999a); (43) Djorgovski et al. (2000); (44) Hjorth et al. (2002); (45) Kulkarni et al. (1998); (46) Odewahn et al. (1998); (47) Djorgovski et al. (2001); (48) Bloom et al. (1998a); (49) Fruchter et al. (2000c); (50) Bloom et al. (2001); (51) Fruchter et al. (1999a); (52) Galama et al. (2000).


The redshifts given in Table .1 have also been taken from the literature. In most cases, they were determined from emission lines directly observed in the spectra of the hosts. For the other sources, they were derived as the redshifts of the furthest absorbing medium observed in absorption within the spectra of the GRB optical transients. We made the assumption that the first interstellar medium illuminated by the background afterglow is indeed that of its host galaxy itself. We note that this hypothesis has been confirmed in several cases where the derived redshift could have been confirmed with emission lines from the host.

These redshifts and R magnitudes were subsequently used to derive the absolute B magnitudes given in Col. (1) of Table .1, assuming a $\Lambda $CDM Universe with $\Omega _m=0.3$, $\Omega _\lambda =0.7$. For each host, the k-correction for the R-filter and rest-frame B-R colour used for this computation were estimated taking account of the type of SED suggested by its R-K and/or optical colours when available (see Table 2 and Fig. 4), otherwise assuming a blue continuum with a spectral slope $F_{\nu}
\varpropto \nu^{-1}$.

To better establish the validity of our results, we also estimated, for most of the hosts, the absolute B magnitudes from the observed flux density at the redshifted B-band wavelength. For each case, this flux density was derived interpolating the various broad-band filter magnitudes given in the literature (see Table .1 for references) including the K magnitudes given in Table 2. The final results are indicated in Col. (2) of Table .1. To compare the two methods, we computed the difference between the estimations given in the two columns, and found a mean value MB(1) - MB(2) > = 0.07 and a dispersion $\sigma$  $\left(M_{B(1)}{-}M_{B(2)}\right)=0.18$.


next previous
Up: Are the hosts of galaxies?

Copyright ESO 2003