...[*]
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Research Abroad.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...[*]
Visiting Academics at Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK (1st March-31st December 2001).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... stars[*]
${\cal R}=R$and ${\cal Y}_i=y(1-R)$ for the notation in LF98. These two parameters are calculated in the formalism of the instantaneous recycling approximation.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...$M_\odot$)[*]
We assumed the Salpeter IMF with the range from 0.1-120 $M_\odot$, but the difference in the higher mass cut has little influence on the SN rate.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... H99[*]
See Fig. 3 of the paper. Although H99 examined "different IMF'', this difference only affects the values of ${\cal R}$ and ${\cal Y}_i$. Therefore, his result can be used to see the effect of varying ${\cal R}$ and ${\cal Y}_i$.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... Herschel [*]
http://astro.estec.esa.nl/First/
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... SPICA[*]
http://www.ir.isas.ac.jp/SPICA/index.html
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Copyright ESO 2002