Using IRAS and published ISO observations obtained at other wavelengths we
have determined the far-infrared spectral energy distributions of the excess
stars. The spectral energy distributions after subtraction of the photospheric
emission component have been plotted in Fig. 5. When the
observed emission in the IRAS 12 m band is within 5% of the estimated
photospheric emission, an upper limit of 5% photospheric emission is
presented.
The 12/25 flux ratio for HD 191408 yields a colour temperature of about
600 K assuming a
dust emissivity. In combination with the ISO
upper limit at 60
m we consider it more likely that the excess emission
is due to coronal free-free emission. Also
at 12-25
m, a typical power law
for free-free emission (
).
We therefore exclude this star in the subsequent analysis.
![]() |
Figure 5:
The far-infrared spectral energy distributions of the 25 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Of the five remaining stars we have derived the 25/60 colour temperatures to
analyse the temperature of the dust causing the 25 m excess emission.
Assuming a
dust emissivity, we find temperatures between 49
and 122 K. The inferred temperatures are included in Table 2.
HD 38678 has the highest temperature (122 K) and is the only star for which
the 25
m excess flux density is higher than that at 60
m.
The fraction of Vega-like stars in our sample with a significant excess at 25
m is 5 out of 81 or 6%. Did we overlook genuine 25
m excess stars?
There are two stars for which IRAS shows a significant excess which cannot be
confirmed by ISO. The IRAS measurement of g Lup (HD 139664) at 25
m
(493 mJy) would indicate a strong excess above the photosphere. We find,
however, an ISO flux (
mJy) which is close to the predicted
photospheric flux. This star shows one of the largest discrepancies between ISO
and IRAS. HD74576 (see Table 1) is the other star where IRAS
would indicate an excess higher than 120 mJy but is rejected because of an
inconsistent ISO measurement. Based on these two cases we conclude that from
our 25
m sample, the uncertainty in the number of excess stars is at most
two, giving a most probable fraction of Vega-like stars with 25
m excess
of 6% and a maximum possible fraction of 9%. This is smaller than the
fraction found at 60
m (18%) in Paper I.
The non-detection of significant 25 m excess emission for all other
stars in the sample shows that the Vega-like disks are generally cool:
the largest fraction of the dust in the disk must be colder than 120 K.
The median 25
m flux in our sample is
mJy
([25]=3.3 mag). To be detectable in our sample the typical contrast
C25 between emission from a presumed disk and the stellar photosphere
must be greater than
,
i.e.
C25> 0.3.
Assuming a disk temperature of 120 K, the minimum detectable dust mass of
the disk is estimated to be
for an A0 dwarf (
9600 K) and
for a G0 dwarf (
6000 K). See Appendix A
for a description of the calculation. These masses increase for lower dust
temperatures. For comparison, the minimum detectable mass in the survey at
60
m is
(Paper I). Our Vega-like candidates are all included in the list of Paper I.
Since all Vega candidates in Paper I have inferred
masses larger than
we conclude
that we have detected essentially the warmest disks at 25
m.
Three stars in our sample ( Leo,
Lyr, and
Pic)
show significantly more far-infrared emission at
m
than the modified black body energy distributions would predict, see
Fig. 5. This could be an indication of the presence of colder
dust material in the disk, presumably at larger radii from the stars.
The minimum detectable mass of
for a
G0 dwarf assumes an arbitrarily chosen fixed distance between the disk and the
star. The detection of only A stars suggests that only stars of this stellar
type are sufficiently bright to heat the dust at a minimum distance of the
star. For example, a 1
m size silicate particle must be at
35 AU
from an A0 star to be at a temperature of 120 K. At this distance, the
temperature of a similar dust particle around a G0 star would be
86 K,
yielding a minimum mass of
.
It is
therefore more likely that the minimum detectable mass in our sample is
.
Copyright ESO 2002