This section compares our VLT data with those of merged sets compiled from the literature. It describes the possible group characteristics of the objects from color-color plots and outlines suggestions deduced from spectral gradient histograms of the objects.
The color-color plots of the KBOs and Centaurs measured at the VLT (see Fig. 1) suggest the following:
This paper's dataset has been merged with a complete compilation of
the TNO colors published in the literature (totalling 100
objects); this compilation is presented and analyzed with a set of
statistical tools in Hainaut & Delsanti (2001). In this section, we shall
highlight some of the comparisons between the VLT observations
presented here and the whole, multi-telescope, multi-observer dataset
(of which this dataset represent about 25%).
In Fig. 3, we show the distribution of the spectral gradients of KBOs and Centaurs. The histograms were compiled in the same way as described in Boehnhardt et al. (2001). The dataset used is composed of the measurements presented in this paper, combined with the input of Table 5 in Boehnhardt et al. (2001). The histogram bins are 10%/100 nm wide which is the mean uncertainty of the object spectral gradients.
The bulk of KBOs falls into the reddening range of 0-40%/100 nm with the maximum objects towards the red end of the distribution. The Centaurs may have a distinctly different distribution of spectral gradients, since the distribution "peaks'' between 10-20%/100 nm. Considering the three dynamical groups among KBOs separately, it is obvious that the Cubewanos resemble best the global trend in the spectral gradient histograms of all KBOs, while the Plutinos seem to follow more the Centaurs' trend, i.e. with a peak towards smaller reddening gradients. A second "population'' of Plutinos has very red spectral slopes, while the range of the Cubewano peak is poorly occupied among the Plutinos. It is too early to draw conclusions about the group properties of scattered disk objects since only 8 objects have been measured so far. For the same reasons of low statistical significance, the suggestions concerning the Centaur and Plutino population distribution peaks have to be viewed with caution.
The evolution of the surface of the objects is probably the result of the balance of different processes. To date, the suspected processes are:
These three processes effect either the objects as a whole (aging) or only a fraction of the surface (non-disruptive collisions). However, at all times of its evolution, an object surface element will present a straight reflectivity spectrum at visible wavelengths (cf. laboratory spectra, Thompson et al. 1987). As a consequence, the average reflectivity spectrum of the object is also straight, explaining why all the objects are within their error bars on the reddening line (which represents the locus in a color-color plot of objects with a linear reflectivity spectrum).
Objects | (1) | Our data | Other published | |||
cf | Gradient | (2) | Comparison with other data(3) | information | ||
text | Color | |||||
1993 SB | Plut | Neutral | V-R compatible with Gil01 | Dav00: V-J color | ||
B-V, V-R compatible with Teg00 | ||||||
V-R, R-I comp. with Lag00 (1![]() |
||||||
R mag compatible with Wil95 | ||||||
1994 TB | Plut | Red | BVRI comp. with Luu96 & Teg97 | Dav00: V-J color | ||
v | B-V, V-R: good agreem. with Bar99 | |||||
V-R, R-I comp. with Lag00 (1![]() |
||||||
V-R compatible with Teg98 | ||||||
1995 SM55 | QB1 | Neutral | V-R compatible with Gil01 | Boe01: visible spectrum | ||
Bluish | v | BVRI colors compatible with Boe01 | Hil01: J light-curve | |||
(Run 2 at 1.5![]() |
||||||
1995 TL8 | Scat | Red | First published | |||
1996 RQ20 | QB1 | Red | v | BVRI colors compatible with Boe01 | ||
V-R 0.17 mag> Teg98 (1.5![]() |
||||||
1997 QH4 | QB1 | Neutral | Teg00: B-V equal, V-R compatible (1![]() |
|||
R-I first published | ||||||
1997 QJ4 | Plut | Neutral | V-R in agreement with Gil01 | Dav00: V-J color | ||
Bluish | B-V, R-I first published | |||||
1998 BU48 | Scat | Red | First published | She01: light-curve | ||
1998 SG35 | Cent | Neutral | Dor01: V-R, R-I compatible; Our | |||
B-V<0.2 mag (margin. signif.) | ||||||
1998 SM165 | QB1 | Red | B-V, V-R margin. comp. with Teg00 | |||
1998 SN165 | QB1 | Neutral | V-R compatible with Gil01 | |||
Bluish | Dor01: V-R, R-I margin. compatible; | |||||
Our B-V<0.25 mag (margin. signif.) | ||||||
1998 TF35 | Cent | Very red | B-V, V-R compatible with Boe01 | |||
1998 UR43 | Plut | Neutral | v | V-R <0.13 mag than Gil01 | ||
Bluish | ||||||
1998 WH24 | QB1 | Red | B-V, V-R compatible with Teg00 | Bro01: "Pholus-like''(4) | ||
V-R marginally comp. with Boe01 | near-IR spectrum | |||||
1998 WV31 | Plut | Neutral | First published | |||
1998 WX31 | QB1 | Red | First published | |||
1999 CC158 | Scat | Neutral | First published | |||
1999 CD158 | QB1 | Neutral | First published | |||
1999 CF119 | Scat | Neutral | v | First published | ||
1999 DE9 | Scat | Neutral | First published | She01: light-curve | ||
Bro01: "Pholus-like''(4) spec. | ||||||
1999 OX3 | Scat | Neutral | R-I first published | Dor01: B-V, V-R | ||
1999 RZ253 | QB1 | Red | VRI first published | Dor01: B-V | ||
Bro00: near-IR spectrum | ||||||
1999 TC36 | Plut | Red | BVRI colors compatible with Boe01 | Bro00: near-IR spectrum | ||
Dor01: B-V, V-R compatible; | ||||||
Our R-I <0.1 mag (1![]() |
||||||
1999 TD10 | Scat | Neutral | V-R compatible with Con00 | Bro01: "Pholus-like''(4) spec. | ||
1999 UG5 | Cent | Red | In agreement with Gut01 | Gut01: R light-curve | ||
and marginally with Pei01 | ||||||
2000 OK67 | QB1 | Neutral | v | First published | ||
2000 QC243 | QB1 | Neutral | First published | |||
Bluish |
(1) Class: QB1 = Cubewano, Plut = Plutino, Scat = Scaterred Disk Object, Cent = Centaur.
(2) Object displaying a variability during the VLT observations. (3) Abbreviation code for the references: Bar99 = Barucci et al. (1999), Boe01 = Boehnhardt et al. (2001), Bro00 = Brown (2000), Bro01 = Brown (2001), Con00 = Consolmagno et al. (2000), Dav00 = Davies et al. (2000), Dor01 = Doressoundiram et al. (2001), Gil01 = Gil-Hutton & Licandro (2001), Gut01 = Gutiérrez et al. (2001), Hil01 = Hillier et al. (2001), Luu96 = Luu & Jewitt (1996), Lag00 = Lagerkvist et al. (2000), Pei01 = Peixinho et al. (2001), She01 = Sheppard & Jewitt (2001), Teg97 = Tegler & Romanishin (1997), Teg98 = Tegler & Romanishin (1998), Teg00 = Tegler & Romanishin (2000), Wil95 = Williams et al. (1995). (4) ``Pholus-like'' spectrum : characterized by 2 features of water ice and a feature of methanol, Brown (2001). |
In this section, we compare our color values with those reported in
the literature. We also mention the other information available for
these objects. This study is presented in Table 5;
some additional comments can be found below for some of the objects.
1994 TB: there is a significant decrease of brightness by
0.25-0.30 mag between September and November (in R and I band),
which is about 2 times the error bars. This could be due to rotational
effects. To date, no light-curve has been published. We present the
reflectivity spectra at the two different epochs in Fig. 4. It is also interesting to note that the colors and
spectral gradient of the object changed significantly between the 2
epochs, suggesting a variegated surface. This object deserves a
detailed multi-color light-curve.
1995 SM55: the absolute magnitude is marginally brightening
by 0.07 magnitude (including a solar phase effect correction of
of 0.008 mag/
). The gradients are compatible
between the two periods (cf. Table 3).
It is interesting to note that Hillier et al. (2001) observed 1995 SM55 several times in J band over the Oct. 1999-Jan. 2001 period. The object's J light-curve is compatible with a constant, except for rapid variations (about 0.4 mag in a few hours) on 8 October 1999 and during January 2000, and for a brightening of almost 1 mag on 22 October, 1999. While the brightening could possibly be explained by mediocre observing conditions, the authors affirm that the rapid changes seen over the January 2000 period are real and that they must correspond to a physical process occurring on the object.
Our observations, corrected for V-J, are compatible with the "quiescent'' phase of the object. Considering the neutral-bluish colors of the object, the short time-scale of the variations observed and their seemingly random behavior, 1995 SM55 could possibly host some cometary activity, and deserves a detailed study.
1996 RQ20: displays a marginally significant variability in R over half an hour.
1998 BU48: no variability within the same night. Sheppard & Jewitt (2001) report a light-curve with an amplitude of 0.4 mag and a period larger than 4 hours.
1998 UR43: significant variation in R band of 0.3 mag over
1 hour suggesting a light-curve effect. Our V-R value is 0.13 lower than that of Gil-Hutton & Licandro (2001). As our measurements is right on the reddening line, it is possible that their color was affected by the rotation.
1999 CF119: shows a variability of 0.1 mag in the Rband over half an hour, suggesting a rotational effect.
1999 DE9: Sheppard & Jewitt (2001) report a light-curve constant within 0.05 mag over few hours. Jewitt et al. (2000) reported a spectrum showing water ice features; however, this result has not been published yet.
1999 UG5: a light-curve in R band has been published by Gutiérrez et al. (2001). The authors reported noticeable changes in brightness (0.2 mag) over 5 hours, which may be interpreted as the rotational light-curve (they cannot discriminate whether the variations are caused by the shape or by an albedo feature). Other causes are still possible, although cometary activity does not seem very likely.
2000 OK67: the repeated observations in V band indicate a significant variation of 0.2 mag between the two runs.
As explained in Sect. 5.4, the locus of objects with a
linear spectrum (but with different spectral slopes) is the "reddening
line'' shown in the color-color plots (Fig. 1) for a
slope
ranging from -10 to 70
/100 nm. The objects
presented in this paper are located along this line (within their error
bars, see Fig. 1), indicating that they display linear
reflectivity spectra over the visible (VRI) wavelengths.
We could expect that an object undergoing an aging process caused by irradiation (i.e. reddening of its surface, cf. Sect. 6.4) may move along this line toward redder colors. At even higher irradiation dose, objects display a neutral but darker reflectivity spectrum (Thompson et al. 1987; Johnson 2001), which means that they should move back down toward more neutral colors along this reddening line on the color-color plots. It is however unclear if a TNO can remain undisturbed long enough to evolve into a dark neutral colored object.
More generally, the possible path of a generic Kuiper Belt object in a color-color plot during its life has still to be determined, possibly by the modeling of the contribution of the different evolution processes involved (i.e. not only by the aging process). We can also consider that bluish objects are likely to be covered by fresh ice (in the case they are not covered by high-irradiated neutral-dark material Thompson et al. 1987), and are therefore more likely to host some cometary activity. As neutral objects could therefore have very young surfaces, with possible cometary activity, or very old surfaces with a very low albedo, we recommend observers to devote telescope time to these objects, especially with instruments that could directly measure their albedo (e.g. the thermal emission) such as SIRTF, or detect a cometary activity (e.g. very high spatial resolution with a large collecting area.)
Copyright ESO 2001