![]() |
Figure 2: Mercator plots of the time-series spot modelling at three different epochs. Shown are the times marked by the three arrows on the time-axis in Fig. 1. For more explanations see the text. |
For the spot modelling, we apply the TISMO code developed by Bartus
(1996) and sucessfully applied to the RS CVn binary HR 1099 in
Strassmeier & Bartus (2000).
The code is written for inverting the light curve
variations in the time domain rather in the
(rotational) phase domain. It is thus able to provide a
continuous fit for the photometric light variations in consecutive
rotational cycles caused
by starspots with varying geometry. The output parameters are the time
dependent spot coordinates. By assuming circular dark spots these are
the spot longitudes (
), the spot latitudes (
),
and the spot radii (
). Errors are estimated according
to the photometric precision of the data and the procedure described
in Bartus (1996).
Because the secondary component is not seen, the photometric
variations are attributed entirely to the K1III primary component.
For the modelling, two a priori assumptions are made. First,
the surface temperature is fixed to
K (cf.,
Sect. 4.2) and second,
the "unspotted'' brightness level remains fixed at the maximum
brightness ever observed, i.e
(cf. Strassmeier
et al. 1988). The inclination of the stellar rotation
axis was set to the most probable value of i=60
(cf.,
Sect. 4.2 and Eker 1986).
We started the modelling with just two spots but after a few runs it became
clear that the number of spots had to be increased to three to obtain a
satisfactory fit to the light curve (Fig. 1).
Having the spot temperature as a free parameter, we fit the b-ycurve to search for the most probable spot temperature.
Fits are obtained for spot temperatures
cooler than the surrounding photosphere of 200 K-900 K in steps of 100 K.
The best fit was obtained using
K, i.e.,
K. The upper panel of
Fig. 1 shows the y-band data
and the model fits with either two or three spots with this temperature,
while the lower panel shows the model fit for b-y with just the
three-spot case.
We find that the three spots are nearly equally spaced in longitude,
as indicated in the upper bars in Fig. 1, and also illustrated in
Fig. 2. The latter figure shows mercator plots of the three-spot
solution at three different epochs following each other by
one rotational cycle (these epochs coincide with the mid-epochs of the
spectroscopic datasets SS2, SS4 and SS6, respectively, used later in
Sect. 4). The spot areas are also comparable, between
20-30
in radii. The total spot coverage varies thus between
10-20% of a hemisphere during one rotation. Despite that the spot
latitudes are the most
uncertain parameters, the resulting latitudinal positions indicate
spottedness predominantly at lower latitudes. In our solutions,
cool regions do not reach latitudes higher than
60
.
Considerable evolution of the spot parameters is not seen,
however, a small systematic decrease of the longitudes
of SPOT 1 and SPOT 2 is present, while SPOT 3 performs a mixed motion
with replacements in both directions and also an increase in size.
The spot migrations are of the order of 2-3
per rotational cycle,
i.e. the order of the uncertainty
of the spot modelling (see, e.g., Kovári & Bartus 1997).
Thus, the detection of such small spot-motion patterns and their
interpretation due to surface differential rotation
requires longer baselines in time.
Copyright ESO 2001