EDP Sciences
Free Access
Volume 452, Number 2, June III 2006
Page(s) 623 - 630
Section The Sun
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054643
Published online 22 May 2006

A&A 452, 623-630 (2006)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054643

What is the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity injected in a solar active region?

E. Pariat1, 2, A. Nindos3, P. Démoulin1 and M. A. Berger4

1  LESIA, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, UMR 8109 (CNRS), 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
    e-mail: [etienne.pariat;pascal.demoulin]@obspm.fr
2  Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France
3  Section of Astrogeophysics, Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, 45110, Greece
    e-mail: anindos@cc.uoi.gr
4  Department of Mathematics, University College London, UK
    e-mail: m.berger@ucl.ac.uk

(Received 5 December 2005 / Accepted 26 February 2006)

Context.Magnetic helicity is suspected to play a key role in solar phenomena such as flares and coronal mass ejections. Several investigations have recently computed the photospheric flux of magnetic helicity in active regions. The derived spatial maps of the helicity flux density, called GA, have an intrinsic mixed-sign patchy distribution.
Aims. Pariat et al. (2005) recently showed that GA is only a proxy of the helicity flux density, which tends to create spurious polarities. They proposed a better proxy, $G_{\theta}$. We investigate here the implications of this new approach on observed active regions.
Methods. The magnetic data are from MDI/SoHO instrument and the photospheric velocities are computed by local correlation tracking. Maps and temporal evolution of GA and $G_{\theta}$ are compared using the same data set for 5 active regions.
Results. Unlike the usual GA maps, most of our $G_{\theta}$ maps show almost unipolar spatial structures because the nondominant helicity flux densities are significantly suppressed. In a few cases, the $G_{\theta}$ maps still contain spurious bipolar signals. With further modelling we infer that the real helicity flux density is again unipolar. On time-scales larger than their transient temporal variations, the time evolution of the total helicity fluxes derived from GA and $G_{\theta}$ show small differences. However, unlike GA, with $G_{\theta}$ the time evolution of the total flux is determined primarily by the predominant-signed flux while the nondominant-signed flux is roughly stable and probably mostly due to noise.
Conclusions.Our results strongly support the conclusion that the spatial distribution of helicity injected into active regions is much more coherent than previously thought: on the active region scale the sign of the injected helicity is predominantly uniform. These results have implications for the generation of the magnetic field (dynamo) and for the physics of both flares and coronal mass ejections.

Key words: Sun: magnetic fields -- Sun: photosphere -- Sun: Corona

© ESO 2006

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.