Table A.1: Summary of the results of the linear fit to the distributions of emldetect (RATE) vs. Poissonian (crpoisim) count rates.
Energy band $N_{{\rm tot}}$ LI $\chi^2_{\rm LI}$ $\chi^2_0$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
0.5-1 16 349 $\rm 1.056_{-0.005}^{+0.005}$ 4067 4402
1-2 17 817 $\rm 1.054_{-0.005}^{+0.005}$ 3995 4323
2-4.5 8760 $\rm 1.054_{-0.007}^{+0.008}$ 1675 1824
4.5-10 1796 $\rm 1.102_{-0.015}^{+0.016}$ 276.5 395.1
0.5-2 22 952 $\rm 1.032_{-0.003}^{+0.004}$ 6493 6692
2-10 8484 $\rm 1.076_{-0.007}^{+0.007}$ 1654 1983
(1) Energy band definition (in keV). (2) Number of sources used in the fit. (3) Best fit slopes. (4) Best fit $\chi ^2$ obtained when the slope is left free to vary. (5) Best fit $\chi ^2$ obtained when the slope is fix to a value of 1 (i.e. assuming that on average emldetect and Poissonian count rates do not differ).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text