\begin{table}%tA.1
  \caption{\label{table:2}Summary of the results of the linear fit to the distributions of {\tt emldetect} (RATE) vs. Poissonian ($crpoisim$) count rates.}
\small%\centerline
 {
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c }         
\hline\hline                  
%&&&&& \\[-8pt]
Energy band      &  $N_{{\rm tot}}$ & LI & $\chi^2_{\rm LI}$  & $\chi^2_0$ \\
 (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) \\
\hline                         
%&&&&& \\[-8pt]
0.5--1  & 16~349 & $\rm 1.056_{-0.005}^{+0.005}$ & 4067  & 4402   \\
1--2    & 17~817 & $\rm 1.054_{-0.005}^{+0.005}$ & 3995  & 4323   \\
2--4.5  &  8760 & $\rm 1.054_{-0.007}^{+0.008}$ & 1675  & 1824   \\
4.5--10 &  1796 & $\rm 1.102_{-0.015}^{+0.016}$ & 276.5 & 395.1  \\
0.5--2  & 22~952 & $\rm 1.032_{-0.003}^{+0.004}$ & 6493  & 6692   \\
2--10   &  8484 & $\rm 1.076_{-0.007}^{+0.007}$ & 1654  & 1983    \\
\hline                                    
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
 (1) Energy band definition (in keV). (2)~Number of sources used in the fit. (3)~Best fit slopes. 
(4)~Best fit $\chi^2$ obtained when the slope is left free to vary.
(5)~Best fit $\chi^2$ obtained when the slope is fix to a value of~1 (i.e. assuming that on average 
{\tt emldetect} and Poissonian count rates do not differ).
\end{table}