A&A 490, 25-29 (2008)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810204
C. Hernández-Monteagudo^{1} - R. A. Sunyaev^{1,2}
1 - Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik,
Karl Schwarzschild Str. 1, 85741
Garching bei München, Germany
2 -
Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, 117997 Moscow, Russia
Received 15 May 2008 / Accepted 21 July 2008
Abstract
Most of the missing baryons are found in slightly overdense structures like
filaments and superclusters, but to date most of them have remained hidden
to observation. At the same time, the linear cosmological perturbation
theory predicts the existence of extended bulk flows seeded by the
gravitational attraction of linear potential wells, but again these also
remain undetected. If the peculiar motion of galaxy groups and clusters
indeed resembles that of the surrounding baryons, then the kinetic
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) pattern of those massive halos should be closely
correlated to the kSZ pattern of all surrounding electrons. Likewise, it
should also be correlated to the CMB E-mode polarization field generated via
Thomson scattering after reionization. We explore the cross-correlation of
the kSZ generated in groups and clusters to the all sky E-mode polarization
in the context of future CMB experiments like Planck, ACT, SPT or APEX. We
find that this cross-correlation effectively probes redshifts below z=3-4 (where most of the baryons cannot be seen), and that it arises on very large
scales (l<10). The significance with which this cross-correlation can be
measured depends on the Poissonian uncertainty associated with the number of
halos where the kSZ is measured and on the accuracy of the kSZ estimations
themselves. Assuming that Planck can provide a cosmic variance limited
E-mode polarization map at l<20 and
kSZ estimates can be
gathered for all clusters more massive than
,
then this
cross-correlation should be measured at the 2-3 level. Further, if
an all-sky ACT or SPT type CMB experiment provides similar kSZ measurements
for all halos above
,
then the cross-correlation total
signal to noise (S/N) ratio should be at the level of 4-5. A detection of
this cross-correlation would provide direct and definite evidence of bulk
flows and missing baryons simultaneously.
Key words: cosmology: cosmic microwave background - cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe
One of the fundamental predictions of the standard cosmological model is that baryons (and matter in general) should be moving in extended bulk flows generated by the gravitational pull of large scale overdense regions. Despite being potentially useful for cosmological studies (Atrio-Barandela et al. 2008; Kashlinsky & Atrio-Barandela 2000; Atrio-Barandela et al. 2004), none of those bulk flows have been detected to date (Benson et al. 2003), partially due to the difficulty of detecting baryonic matter in the local universe. Indeed, the visible baryonic matter in the various frequency ranges amounts only to one ninth of the total budget of baryons predicted by the cosmological model (Fukugita & Peebles 2004, this is the so called missing baryon problem). All these baryons must be found in the present Universe, since they have been detected at large ( ) and intermediate redshift ( ), by means of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) (Hinshaw et al. 2008) and Lyman- forest (McDonald et al. 2005; Croft et al. 1998) observations. However, no conclusive observational evidence has been found at low redshift. Some indications have been derived from the observation of absorption lines in the direction of quasars (see Nicastro et al. (2005b,a) and references therein), or a soft X-ray excess around clusters (e.g., Kull & Böhringer 1999; Zappacosta et al. 2002). Cen & Ostriker (2005,1999) concluded that most of the baryons are in a warm phase (WHIM), defined by the temperature range K. Whether most of this gas is in a diffuse phase or in small, unresolved, collapsed objects is still an open question. Recently, Génova-Santos et al. (2005,2008) detected a non-Gaussian cold spot when looking at the CMB radiation in the direction of Corona Borealis, and discussed its interpretation in the context of the thermal and the kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effects. The thermal effect (tSZ, Sunyaev & Zeldovich 1972) expresses the distortion that the black body CMB spectrum undergoes due to Compton scattering on hot electrons. On the other hand, the kinetic effect (kSZ, Sunyaev & Zeldovich 1980) describes the Thomson scattering between CMB photons and electrons in which there is no energy exchange (and therefore it introduces thermal or frequency independent brightness temperature fluctuations). In the case of Corona Borealis, it was suggested that a face on filament could give rise, via either tSZ or kSZ, to the pattern seen in the CMB maps. However, it was shown in Hernández-Monteagudo et al. (2006b) that the tSZ is not a useful tool to track the baryons outside the largest collapsed halos: about 80% of the tSZ luminosity is generated in the most massive collapsed structures, and the 50% of baryons located in underdense or slightly overdense regions give rise to only 5% of the total tSZ luminosity. The kSZ is most promising, since it does not require high gas pressure, but relative velocities with respect to the CMB instead (which is itself a prediction of the model). However, the drawback is that the kSZ temperature fluctuations do not depend on the frequency, and therefore they cannot be easily distinguished from the intrinsic CMB temperature fluctuations. However, the kSZ further modifies the CMB photon field by introducing additional polarization, and this should provide another way to isolate this effect.
Figure 1: ( Left panel) a) Visibility function versus redshift under WMAP5 cosmogony. ( Middle panel) b) Thomson optical depth versus redshift due to all electrons (solid line) and to those electrons contained in halos more massive than (dashed line). ( Right panel) c) Showing square root of angular power spectra, note the K units. Thick solid line: total CMB temperature anisotropy amplitude. Filled circles: total kSZ induced temperature fluctuations generated during and after reionization. Thin solid line: total E polarization mode power spectrum. Thick dashed line: correlation term of the Thomson scattering induced fluctuations generated in galaxy clusters. Thin dashed line: Poisson term of the Thomson scattering induced fluctuations in galaxy clusters. Dot-dashed line: cross-correlation between the total E-mode polarization (thin solid line) and the correlated part of the kSZ generated in galaxy groups and clusters (thick dashed line). | |
Open with DEXTER |
In this work we exploit the anisotropic nature of the Thomson scattering (for which linear polarization is introduced in the CMB), and use it as a tool to reveal the bulk flows of the missing baryons in the low redshift universe, (z < 2-3). For that, we need to assume that the peculiar motion of clusters and groups are correlated to the velocities of the surrounding matter (just as the linear theory predicts), and use future measurements on halos as a kSZ template for all baryons. In Sect. 2 we compute the kSZ and the polarization generated during and after reionization, and the cross-correlation between both. In Sect. 3 we compute the kSZ produced by the halo population and the signal to noise (S/N) ratio for its cross-correlation to the all-sky E-mode polarization. We discuss our results and conclude in Sect. 4. Throughout this paper, we use a cosmological parameter set corresponding to the WMAP5 + CDM model (Hinshaw et al. 2008).
According to WMAP data, the first stars must have reionized the IGM at around (Hinshaw et al. 2008). Since then, CMB photons and electrons have interacted again via Thomson scattering. As during recombination, this scattering preserves the black body spectrum of the CMB, but changes the direction of the CMB photons, and, in the presence of a non-vanishing quadrupole of the CMB intensity, in also induces linear polarization. This process is the cause of a partial blurring of the anisotropies generated at the surface of last scattering and also the generation of new anisotropies at scales comparable to the horizon at ( or , Siuniaev 1977). (One should also consider that, if reionization proceeded first in those most overdense regions hosting the first stars, then it must also have left a patchy signature on the CMB small scale anisotropies. However, in this work we shall neglect these small angle fluctuations). The temperature anisotropies introduced in the CMB intensity were caused by the peculiar motions of the scatterers (electrons) with respect to the CMB, (i.e., the kSZ effect). A simple expression for these temperature anisotropies is given by the following integral of the projection of the peculiar velocity along the line of sight :
(note that we are neglecting the few percent contribution of the polarization terms). As in Seljak & Zaldarriaga (1996), in this equation is the conformal time (related to the coordinate time via d , with a the cosmological scale factor), and are its values at reionization and present, respectively. Dots will denote derivatives with respect to the conformal time. The (proper) electron peculiar velocity is given by , and its Fourier counterpart can be related to the underlying linear density perturbation field by means of the continuity equation. These peculiar velocities describe the large scale bulk flows of matter that are generated by the linear perturbations in the matter density field. The visibility function is defined as , with the Thomson optical depth given by . In this expression, is the background electron number density and the Thomson cross section. The Thomson opacity is given by . The visibility function denotes the probability that a CMB photon was last scattered at the epoch given by . In panel (a) of Fig. 1 it can be seen that the visibility function peaks at recombination redshift (as first predicted by Sunyaev & Zeldovich 1970), although it has a second peak at , from the new Thomson scattering taking place after the stars reionize the IGM (Siuniaev 1977). Note that the optical depth behaves differently, increasing steadily up to the reionization redshift (solid line of panel (b) in Fig. 1).
The anisotropic nature of the Thomson scattering introduces linear polarization as long as the CMB intensity has a non-vanishing local quadrupole. In CMB studies, it is customary to map the standard Q and Upolarization Stokes parameters on the (rotation invariant) E and B modes (Zaldarriaga & Seljak 1997; Kamionkowski et al. 1997), which behave with opposite parity properties versus spatial reflections. Pure Thomson scattering should produce no B mode polarization, and hereafter this mode will be neglected. Since the evolution of the intensity and E-mode polarization anisotropies are coupled by the sum of the intensity quadrupole and the polarization monopole and quadrupole, both quantities will be correlated, and this cross-correlation has already been measured by WMAP, (Hinshaw et al. 2008).
Using a modified version of a standard Boltzmann code (like, e.g., CMBFAST Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996) it is straightforward to compute the temperature and E-mode polarization anisotropies generated during and after reionization, and the cross-correlation between them. The results, computed under WMAP5 cosmology (Hinshaw et al. 2008), are displayed in Fig. 1c. The total intensity (TT) and E polarization (EE) angular power spectra are displayed by the thick and thin solid lines, respectively, whereas the cross-correlation between the intensity and E polarization is given by the dotted line (TE). The temperature anisotropies induced by the kSZ during and after reionization are given by the filled circles, and the generation of polarization at the same cosmic epochs is the responsible for the low l ( ) bump in the EE spectrum. Although the WMAP^{} mission has barely measured it, the forthcoming Planck^{} satellite should be able to provide an accurate estimate of the EE angular power spectrum (and this shall be our assumption hereafter).
As mentioned in the Introduction, there are two major aspects of our understanding of the local Universe that still are pending confirmation: one is the detection of the eight ninths of baryons that have not yet been found (Fukugita & Peebles 2004), the another is the measurement of the cosmological bulk flows. With the advent of high resolution and high sensitivity CMB experiments like ACT (Fowler & ACT Collaboration 2006), SPT (Ruhl et al. 2004) or APEX (Dobbs et al. 2006), bulk flows may be detected by looking at the kSZ in galaxy clusters. These structures contain large reservoirs of gas, which constitute sources for relatively large values of optical depth, ( ). Nevertheless, one must have in mind that the kSZ effect is not the only physical mechanism to be found in clusters. Indeed, given the fact that, in these halos, gas can reach temperatures at the level of a few KeV, inverse Compton scattering in which hot electrons transfer energy to CMB photons (tSZ) becomes of relevance as well. However, the brightness temperature fluctuations introduced by this effect cross from negative to positive values at a frequency close to 218 GHz. For this reason, this frequency becomes an ideal window for searching for the kSZ in galaxy clusters.
Figure 2: The total S/N ratio for the correlation of the E-mode polarization with the low redshift (z<3-4) kSZ generated by bulk flows in galaxy groups and clusters. Horizontal axes display the decimal logarithm of the individual group/cluster kSZ measurement S/N ratio (), whereas vertical axes display the decimal logarithm of the minimum mass of groups/clusters considered. Due to Poisson/shot noise, a low choice for makes the high total S/N regions shrink, and this also happens if is chosen too large and too much information is unused. The optimal minimum redshift is around , and the maximum S/N ratio achievable for perfect E and kSZ surveys is 5.8. Note that we are assuming . | |
Open with DEXTER |
The kSZ effect generated in the galaxy cluster population has been studied
extensively (Peel 2006; Bhattacharya & Kosowsky 2007; Hernández-Monteagudo et al. 2006a; Bhattacharya & Kosowsky 2008, etc.). In particular, in
Hernández-Monteagudo et al. (2006a) an analysis of the correlation properties of the cluster
peculiar motion was provided. They found that the typical correlation length
of these peculiar velocities (i.e., the typical size of a bulk flow) is
typically 20 h^{-1} Mpc in comoving units. This means that a large fraction
of the gas that is surrounding the clusters is actually comoving with
it. This can be envisioned as flows of matter (containing clusters, groups and
diffuse gas) falling into the (future) supercluster's potential well, and
generating a kSZ dipole pattern at its center as
different flows merge in that region (Diaferio et al. 2000). This is related to the basic assumption
of this work: peculiar motion of baryons in a given region is well
described by the peculiar motion of the largest galaxy groups and clusters
within the same region. When computing the all sky kSZ angular power spectrum
generated by clusters, Hernández-Monteagudo et al. (2006a) found that although the this could be
decomposed in four terms, only two of them give rise to most of
the power: a correlation term (generated by the bulk flows) was dominant at
the very large angular scales, whereas the anisotropy induced by the Poisson
statistics would dominate at smaller scales. Both correlation and Poisson
terms are shown by the thick and thin dashed lines in
Fig. 1c. The former has been computed using a modified version of
the CMBFAST code where the Thomson opacity generated in clusters at a given
reads (Hernández-Monteagudo et al. 2006a):
We are interested in the correlated component of the cluster kSZ, i.e., in the
velocity component that should be comoving with the surrounding matter. If
this is indeed the case, then the pattern of the kSZ in clusters must be very
similar to that of the kSZ generated by all electrons (filled circles in
Fig. 1), and therefore it must be closely correlated to the
E mode of the polarization anisotropies generated during and after
reionization (i.e., the low l bump). The actual amplitude of this
cross-correlation will depend on the redshift range that a given set of halos
is probing, and the signal to noise (S/N) ratio of this cross-correlation for
a particular multipole l is provided by
The horizontal axis of Fig. 2 corresponds to the S/N ratio at which the kSZ can be determined in a single halo, i.e., in Eq. (3). The number of potential contaminants when measuring the kSZ in a halo is relatively high: the tSZ has a definite spectral dependence, and should be close to zero at GHz, however asymmetries in the frequency response of the experiment together with relativistic effects (Itoh & Nozawa 2004) will inevitably leave some residuals. However, as shown in Hernández-Monteagudo et al. (2006a), its weight relative to the kSZ decreases for the most numerous low mass halos, for which the relativistic tSZ corrections are also less important. Internal motion within the halos (which, as found by Diaferio et al. 2005, is only relevant for slow halos) should average out when integrating over the total halo solid angle. The uncorrelated component of the kSZ could be significant in those systems where the velocity of halos are thermalized; however this almost never happens for the galaxy groups and clusters being targeted here, since superclusters are structures that are not yet relaxed. Nevertheless, Peel (2006) found that, in his cosmological simulations, the peculiar velocities of haloes showed correlation properties that differed substantially from linear theory predictions, even at high redshift. If this is indeed the case, then the issue would be whether the baryons surrounding halos would have their peculiar velocities affected in the same way or not. We shall address this issue in future work. The impact of IR and radio sources is a priori significant, provided that these sources are correlated to the halos where the kSZ is produced. However, multifrequency observations should provide a good insight into their spectral indexes, and therefore their contribution in the 218 GHz channel should be characterized down to a given accuracy level. How this compares to the actual kSZ signal is something to be reliably evaluated only once real data becomes available. The intrinsic CMB generated at the last scattering surface is another potential source of contamination. As shown in Fig. 6 of Hernández-Monteagudo et al. (2006a), its residuals remain in the few K level if the cluster/group size is not larger than 2-3 arcmins, which should be the case for most of clusters and groups in the sky. Therefore this source of contamination is likely to be less relevant than the rest.
The importance of each of these contaminants will determine which range of the horizontal axis in Fig. 2 one should look at. Due to the largest amplitude of Poissonian fluctuations at low values of , it is convenient not to consider too nearby clusters and groups. From this figure it is possible to find at which values of the S/N ratio starts to be dominated by Cosmic Variance (the horizontal plateau of the contour levels at high ). Likewise, the steep vertical descent of these contours at low reflects the limit where S/N is exclusively limited by the accuracy of the kSZ measurements.The requirements for a convincing detection of the signature of the local baryon bulk flows (say S/N > 3) involve either a large value of or a low value of , but nevertheless these are not unrealistic. For instance, the Planck satellite should provide a cleaned CMB map in a very large fraction of the sky, and with it, estimations of the kSZ at the cluster and group positions. These estimates should mostly be limited by the beam size and the un-subtracted point source emission. By looking at the Compton distortion y map (obtained from multifrequency observations of the tSZ), one should be able to find the position of not only the largest clusters, but also of those objects that lie closer to the confusion limit, and whose signal can be picked up statistically via the cross-correlation. If this y-map provides the position and the cleaned CMB map the kSZ estimates (of at least ) for all clusters more massive than , then Planck alone would already yield a total S/Nbetween 2 and 3. Likewise, upcoming Dark Energy surveys like Pan-STARRS^{}, DES^{} or PAU-BAO^{}, or X-ray surveys like eROSITA^{} should probe the relevant redshift range, and independently provide catalogs of group and cluster candidates. At the same time, high resolution CMB experiments like ACT, SPT or APEX would contribute more accurate kSZ estimates. Furthermore, future B-mode polarization experiments should cover large fractions of the sky with very high sensitivity, and provide better understanding of the E-mode of the CMB polarization. The maximum achievable value of the total S/N is relatively small (around 5.8), and therefore a large sky coverageis required, since most of the signal arises at l<10. Our computations are within the regime of linear theory. Corrections due to patchy reionization are non linear and therefore should appear at much smaller angular scales. They should also arise at redshifts higher than those corresponding to the kSZ addressed in this work, (z < 3-4). We must also stress again that a cosmic variance limited EE power spectrum has been assumed, at least in those same large angular scales. Very soon, the Planck mission should be able to tell whether this is a sensible assumption or not.
Acknowledgements
C.H.M. acknowledges useful conversations with D.N. Spergel.