All Tables

Table 1: Results of the fits to the star counts data of Fig. 4 using an exponential disc and a triaxial boxy-Gaussian bulge.
Table 2: Summary of the parameters of the nuclear bar as derived from the best fits to the 2MASS star count data.
Table 3: Results of the fits to the star count data of Fig. 5 using a disc, bulge and nuclear bar. The following parameters have been taken from Table 1 and kept fixed: $\alpha ^{B}=10, \ x_0^B=1.117,\ y_0^B=0.513, \ z_0^B=0.362 \ h_{\rm r}=2.5 , \ h_z=0.153$ . The bar angle $\alpha ^b$ is also fixed, the other parameters are free and used to obtain the best fit to the data. The first set of results have been obtained with x₁ fixed to 0. In the second set of results x₁ is a free parameter.
Table 4: Same as Table 3 but with $\alpha ^B=20, \ x_0^B=0.884,\ y_0^B=0.489, \ z_0^B=0.375 \ h_{\rm r}=2.5 , \ h_z=0.156$ . The first set of results have been obtained with x₁ fixed to 0. In the second set of results x₁ is a free parameter.
Table 5: Same as Table 3 but with $\alpha ^B=35, \ x_0^B=0.774,\ y_0^B=0.429, \ z_0^B=0.382 \ h_{\rm r}=2.5 , \ h_z=0.158$ . The first set of results have been obtained with x₁ fixed to 0. In the second set of results x₁ is a free parameter.
Table 6: Same as Table 3 but with $\alpha ^B=45, \ x_0^B=0.693,\ y_0^B=0.367, \ z_0^B=0.385 \ h_{\rm r}=2.5 , \ h_z=0.159$ . The first set of results have been obtained with x₁ fixed to 0. In the second set of results x₁ is a free parameter.