![]() |
Figure 1:
From left to right, we show the morphology of the Sculptor group targets
in the optical (DSS), infrared H (SOFI), and a false-color montage
of H![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 1: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The NIR, H-band, morphology of the M 81 group dIrrs observed at
WHT with INGRID ( right column) is compared to their optical
appearance as seen in DSS images ( left column). The galaxy luminosity
decreases from top to bottom panels. In all images, North is up and
East to the left, and the field of view is ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
For each dIrr in the Sculptor group sample we show the spectrum of
one of the H II regions that enter the L-Z relation.
The spectra are masked near the strong night sky line [O I]
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: For three galaxies in the M 81 group sample the spectrum of the target H II region is shown, with a label identifying the host galaxy. The spectra of other galaxies are of poor quality and have not been used for abundance determinations. For display purposes, each flux has been multiplied by 1015 and a constant has been added. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Comparison of our abundance determinations to literature values, for
H II regions in galaxies with independent - and direct - determinations of
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Metallicity of H II regions vs. absolute H luminosity
of galaxies in the Sculptor and M 81 groups. The upper panel shows
all direct oxygen measurements listed in Table 7,
while in the lower panel only selected regions are plotted with filled
diamonds (see text). The dashed line is a weighted least-squares fit
to the data, and the dotted lines feature the
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Comparison of the luminosities and abundances of our fiducial galaxies
(filled diamonds) with the predictions of a set of closed-box models
of increasing total masses (dotted line curves). For each model the
evolution has been truncated when the remaining gas mass drops below
3 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Abundance vs. absolute H luminosity for galaxies with data taken from the literature (filled triangles) and for our targets (filled circles). In the upper panel, the dashed line is an unweighted fit to the literature data, while our fiducial relation is shown in the lower panel. In both panels dotted lines outline the rms dispersion around the fit. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Oxygen abundances vs. H luminosity for the Salzer et al. (2005) emission-line galaxies (KBG calibration), our dIrrs, and data compiled from the literature. In all panels the dashed line is the fit obtained by Salzer et al. to their data points (small open circles). In the top panel, the thin solid line is the same curve as that shown in Fig. 7, while the filled triangles and solid line correspond to our fiducial L-Z relation. In the central panel, the dotted line is a weighted fit to Salzer et al. galaxies fainter than MH=-20, while the filled triangles and solid line relate to our L-Z relation obtained using abundances re-computed by us with the empirical, indirect method. In the bottom panel, we show the L-Z relation from literature data (filled triangles and solid line). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.1: Response functions for each date of the Lick run: the solid curves are the functions for the blue and red spectra, the dashed curve is the full spectrum function (no dichroic), and the dotted lines are the functions for the high resolution spectra. The functions have been normalized to the peak response. |
Open with DEXTER |