All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{9154f1a.eps}\hspace*{0.2cm... ....eps}\hspace*{0.2cm} \includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{9154f1f.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Gas density profiles for the entire sample. Top left: unscaled profiles; top right: profiles of unscaled density with scaled radius; middle left: profiles of density scaled for redshift evolution; middle right: profiles of density scaled according to T^0.525 as implied by modified self-similar S-T scaling; bottom left: density profiles with a representation of the 1-sigma scatter of the sample; bottom right: the relative dispersion ( $\sigma/\langle n_{\rm e} \rangle$ ) as a function of radius for the cluster sample with profiles scaled according to expected evolution with redshift (black) and by T^0.525 (red).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{9154fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Gas density distributed scaled according to expected evolution with redshift, and coded by temperature so that blue corresponds to a temperature of $\sim$ 2.0 keV and red a temperature of $\sim$ 8 keV.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.5cm,clip]{9154f3a.eps}\hspace*{0.5cm... ....eps}\hspace*{0.5cm} \includegraphics[width=4.5cm,clip]{9154f3c.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Plots of gas density normalisation vs. cluster temperature at 0.03 R₅₀₀ ( left), 0.3 R₅₀₀ ( middle) and at 0.7 R₅₀₀ ( right), for the redshift-scaled density profiles. For the latter two cases, lines of best fit obtained as described in the text are overplotted.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{9154fig4.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: Profiles of $\alpha$ , the density profile slope for the entire cluster sample, colour-coded by cluster temperature as in Fig. 2. Thick red line indicates the mean profile.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.9cm,clip]{9154f5a.eps}\hspace*{0.7cm} \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f5b.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Histograms of the distribution of inner logarithmic slope ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ ) and outer slope ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ) for the density profiles scaled according to their expected evolution with redshift.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9154fig6.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 6: Comparison of the inner and outer slopes of the density profile ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ and $\alpha _{0.3-0.8}$ , respectively) for each cluster.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f7a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f7b.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 7: Plots of the inner ( left) and outer ( right) slopes ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ and $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ), respectively, versus the global cluster temperature, $T_{\rm X}$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9154fig8.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 8: Cluster gas mass vs. global temperature. Solid line is the best fitting relation to this sample obtained using WLSS, dashed line is the results obtained with BCES, and the dotted line is the best-fitting relation for the sample of regular clusters discussed in Arnaud et al. (2007).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f9a.eps}\hspace*{2mm} \i... ...4f9e.eps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f9f.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 9: The relationship between cluster dynamical state as parametrised by power ratios and centre shifts and gas properties. Top: P₃/P₀, bottom: $\langle w \rangle$ . Left to right: inner slope of gas density ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ ), outer slope of gas density ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ), temperature.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f10a.eps}\hspace*{1mm} \... ...10b.eps}\hspace*{1mm} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f10c.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 10: Cooling time profiles for the cluster sample. Left: unscaled profiles in physical units; middle: unscaled gas density in units of scaled radius (corresponding to the top left panel of Fig. 1); right: profiles obtained from the redshift-scaled gas density profiles (corresponding to the middle left panel of Fig. 1).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f11a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f11b.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 11: Histograms of central gas density and central cooling time (at 0.03 R₅₀₀, the innermost radius at which both density and temperature data is available for all clusters), showing that there is no strong evidence for bimodality in their cooling properties.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f12a.eps}\hspace*{0.9c... ...eps}\hspace*{0.9cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f12d.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 12: Comparisons between central gas properties and dynamical state. Left: P₃/P₀ vs. $n_{\rm e} (0.007~R_{500}$ ) ( top) and $t_{\rm cool} (0.03~R_{500})$ ( bottom); right: $\langle w \rangle$ vs. $n_{\rm e} (0.007~R_{500}$ ) ( top) and $t_{\rm cool} (0.03~R_{500})$ ( bottom).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{9154f13.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 13: Comparison of the observed gas density profiles (1 $\sigma$ dispersion in red) and simulated profiles of Borgani et al. (2004) (dashed lines) scaled by $\rho _{\rm vir}$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f14a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f14b.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 14: The gas density normalisation (at 0.3 R₅₀₀) vs. temperature distribution for the simulated cluster sample using both the spectroscopic-like temperature ( left) and the emission-weighted temperature ( right). No significant correlation is seen.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f15a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f15b.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 15: The outer slope ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ) vs. temperature distribution for the observed and simulated cluster samples using both the spectroscopic-like temperature ( left) and the emission-weighted temperature ( right) for the simulated sample.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f16a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=915... ...9154f16k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f16l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.1: Co-added MOS1, MOS2 and pn surface brightness profiles for the entire sample in the energy band 0.3-2.0 keV.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f17a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f17k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f17l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.1: continued.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f18a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...ps,width=6.0cm} } \hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f18g.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.1: continued.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f19a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f19k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f19l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.2: Individual gas density profiles for the entire sample. Vertical lines indicate R₅₀₀ for each cluster.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f20a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f20k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f20l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.2: continued.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f21a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...ps,width=6.0cm} } \hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f21g.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$ Figure A.2: continued.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{9154fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Gas density distributed scaled according to expected evolution with redshift, and coded by temperature so that blue corresponds to a temperature of $\sim$ 2.0 keV and red a temperature of $\sim$ 8 keV.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.5cm,clip]{9154f3a.eps}\hspace{0.5cm... ....eps}\hspace{0.5cm} \includegraphics[width=4.5cm,clip]{9154f3c.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Plots of gas density normalisation vs. cluster temperature at 0.03 R₅₀₀ ( left), 0.3 R₅₀₀ ( middle) and at 0.7 R₅₀₀ ( right), for the redshift-scaled density profiles. For the latter two cases, lines of best fit obtained as described in the text are overplotted.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{9154fig4.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: Profiles of $\alpha$ , the density profile slope for the entire cluster sample, colour-coded by cluster temperature as in Fig. 2. Thick red line indicates the mean profile.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.9cm,clip]{9154f5a.eps}\hspace*{0.7cm} \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f5b.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Histograms of the distribution of inner logarithmic slope ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ ) and outer slope ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ) for the density profiles scaled according to their expected evolution with redshift.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9154fig6.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 6: Comparison of the inner and outer slopes of the density profile ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ and $\alpha _{0.3-0.8}$ , respectively) for each cluster.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f7a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{9154f7b.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 7: Plots of the inner ( left) and outer ( right) slopes ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ and $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ), respectively, versus the global cluster temperature, $T_{\rm X}$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9154fig8.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 8: Cluster gas mass vs. global temperature. Solid line is the best fitting relation to this sample obtained using WLSS, dashed line is the results obtained with BCES, and the dotted line is the best-fitting relation for the sample of regular clusters discussed in Arnaud et al. (2007).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f9a.eps}\hspace{2mm} \i... ...4f9e.eps}\hspace{2mm} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f9f.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 9: The relationship between cluster dynamical state as parametrised by power ratios and centre shifts and gas properties. Top: P₃/P₀, bottom: $\langle w \rangle$ . Left to right: inner slope of gas density ( $\alpha _{<0.05}$ ), outer slope of gas density ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ), temperature.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f10a.eps}\hspace{1mm} \... ...10b.eps}\hspace{1mm} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{9154f10c.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 10: Cooling time profiles for the cluster sample. Left: unscaled profiles in physical units; middle: unscaled gas density in units of scaled radius (corresponding to the top left panel of Fig. 1); right: profiles obtained from the redshift-scaled gas density profiles (corresponding to the middle left panel of Fig. 1).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f11a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f11b.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 11: Histograms of central gas density and central cooling time (at 0.03 R₅₀₀, the innermost radius at which both density and temperature data is available for all clusters), showing that there is no strong evidence for bimodality in their cooling properties.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f12a.eps}\hspace{0.9c... ...eps}\hspace{0.9cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f12d.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 12: Comparisons between central gas properties and dynamical state. Left: P₃/P₀ vs. $n_{\rm e} (0.007~R_{500}$ ) ( top) and $t_{\rm cool} (0.03~R_{500})$ ( bottom); right: $\langle w \rangle$ vs. $n_{\rm e} (0.007~R_{500}$ ) ( top) and $t_{\rm cool} (0.03~R_{500})$ ( bottom).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{9154f13.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 13: Comparison of the observed gas density profiles (1 $\sigma$ dispersion in red) and simulated profiles of Borgani et al. (2004) (dashed lines) scaled by $\rho _{\rm vir}$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f14a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f14b.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 14: The gas density normalisation (at 0.3 R₅₀₀) vs. temperature distribution for the simulated cluster sample using both the spectroscopic-like temperature ( left) and the emission-weighted temperature ( right). No significant correlation is seen.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f15a.eps}\hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{9154f15b.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 15: The outer slope ( $\beta _{0.3-0.8}$ ) vs. temperature distribution for the observed and simulated cluster samples using both the spectroscopic-like temperature ( left) and the emission-weighted temperature ( right) for the simulated sample.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f16a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=915... ...9154f16k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f16l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$	Figure A.1: Co-added MOS1, MOS2 and pn surface brightness profiles for the entire sample in the energy band 0.3-2.0 keV.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f17a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f17k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f17l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$	Figure A.1: continued.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f19a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f19k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f19l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$	Figure A.2: Individual gas density profiles for the entire sample. Vertical lines indicate R₅₀₀ for each cluster.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\hbox{ \epsfig{figure=9154f20a.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure... ...9154f20k.eps,width=6.0cm}\epsfig{figure=9154f20l.eps,width=6.0cm} } \end{figure}$	Figure A.2: continued.
Open with DEXTER