A&A 485, 475-486 (2008)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078533
S. Leon1,2 - L. Verdes-Montenegro2 - J. Sabater2 - D. Espada3 - U. Lisenfeld 4 - A. Ballu5 - J. Sulentic6 - S. Verley7 - G. Bergond2 - E. García2
1 -
Instituto de Radioastronomía Milimétrica (IRAM), Avenida Divina Pastora 7, Núcleo Central, 18012 Granada, Spain
2 -
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC,
Apdo. 3004, 18080
Granada, Spain
3 -
Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, No. 1, Roosevelt Rd, Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
4 -
Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain
5 -
École Nationale Supérieure de Physique, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France
6 -
Department of Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA
7 -
INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy
Received 22 August 2007 / Accepted 4 April 2008
Abstract
Context. This paper is part of a series that describes the results of the AMIGA (Analysis of the interstellar Medium of Isolated GAlaxies) project, studying the largest sample of very isolated galaxies in the local Universe.
Aims. The study of the radio properties of the AMIGA sample is intended to characterize the radio continuum emission for a sample least affected by the local environment, thus providing a reference against which less isolated and interacting samples can be compared.
Methods. Radio continuum data at 325, 1420, and 4850 MHz were extracted from the WENSS, NVSS/FIRST, and GB6 surveys, respectively. The source extractions have been obtained from reprocessing the data and new detections added to the cross-matched detections with the respective survey catalogs. We focus on the complete AMIGA subsample composed of 719 galaxies.
Results. A catalog of radio fluxes was obtained from the above four surveys. Comparison between the NVSS and FIRST detections indicates that the radio continuum is coming from disk-dominated emission in spiral galaxies, in contrast to the results found in high-density environments where nuclear activity is more frequent. The comparison of the radio continuum power with a comparable sample, which is however not selected with respect to its environment, the Condon et al. UGC-SF sample of starforming field galaxies, shows a lower mean value for the AMIGA sample. We have obtained radio-to-optical flux ratios (R) using the NVSS radio continuum flux. The distribution of R for the AMIGA galaxies is consistent with a sample dominated by radio emission from star formation (SF) and a small number of active galactic nuclei (AGN), with less than 3% of the sample with R > 100. We derived the radio luminosity function (RLF) and total power density of the radio continuum emission for the AMIGA sample at 1.4 GHz, and compared them with results from other low-redshift studies. The Schechter fit of the RLF indicates a major weight of the low-luminosity galaxies.
Conclusions. The results indicate the very low level of radio continuum emission in our sample of isolated galaxies, which is dominated by mild disk SF. It confirms thus the AMIGA sample as a suitable template to effectively quantify the role of interactions in samples extracted from denser environments.
Key words: galaxies: evolution - galaxies: luminosity function - radio continuum: galaxies - surveys - mass function
Although it is widely accepted that galaxy interactions stimulate secular evolutionary effects in galaxies (e.g. excess star formation, active nuclei, morphological/kinematic anomalies), the frequency/amplitude of the effects and processes driving them are not well quantified. Prior to about 1970 there was a general belief that interactions did not stimulate unusual activity in galaxies. Radio continuum surveys of galaxy pairs emission statistics opened a debate about the role of interactions in stimulating activity (Tovmassian 1968). The period around 1970 saw several studies reporting a lack of radio continuum enhancement in interacting galaxies (Allen et al. 1973; Wright 1974) closely followed by several surveys that provided evidence for an enhanced level of emission from pairs (Sulentic 1976a, 1976b; Stocke 1978; Stocke et al. 1978). As the fulcrum shifted in favor of interaction induced activity, the debate shifted to the relative response of disk versus nucleus as the source of enhanced emission (Hummel 1980, 1981). Eventually evidence emerged for excess emission from both nuclei and disks (Condon et al. 1982). Not surprisingly, spiral galaxies have provided the strongest evidence of radio enhancement, but recently, evidence has also arisen for radio continuum enhancements in early-type members of mixed pairs (E/S0 + S), possibly via cross-fueling from a gas rich neighbor (Domingue et al. 2005). Interactions apparently do not always lead to enhancement, as proven by compact groups where radio emission is weaker than average, although more strongly concentrated than in more normal galaxies (Menon 1992, 1995, 1999).
A better quantification of interaction enhancement as a function of many different observables is needed before models can be properly constrained and refined. This requires a proper definition for non-interacting galaxy in order to determine the ``zero-point'' or levels of self stimulated emission (nature vs. nurture). The AMIGA project (Analysis of the interstellar Medium of Isolated GAlaxies) involves identification and parameterization of a statistically significant sample of the most isolated galaxies in the local Universe. It is a refinement of the Catalog of Isolated Galaxies (CIG: Karachentseva 1973) which is composed of 1050 galaxies located in the Northern hemisphere. A major AMIGA goal involves characterization of different phases of the interstellar medium in galaxies least affected by their environment.
So far we have: 1) revised all CIG positions
(Leon & Verdes-Montenegro 2003); 2) summarized the redshift and
luminosity properties of the sample including derivation of an
improved Optical Luminosity Function (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2005);
3) provided POSS2 based morphologies for the sample including identification
of remaining certain (32) and suspected (161) interacting galaxies
(Sulentic et al. 2006); 4) reevaluated the IRAS mid-infrared and far-infrared properties
of the sample (Lisenfeld et al. 2007); and 5) performed a reevaluation and quantification of the degree of isolation for the sample (Verley
et al. 2007a,b). The revised CIG-AMIGA sample is reasonably complete
(80%) down to
(Verdes-Montenegro et al.
2005) and is currently the largest sample of isolated galaxies in the local
Universe. These are galaxies whose structure and evolution have been
driven largely or entirely by internal rather than external forces
(i.e. as close to pure nature as exists in a local Universe where
nurture plays many roles). The data are being released and
periodically updated at http://www.iaa.es/AMIGA.html
where a VO (Virtual Observatory) interface
with different query modes has been implemented.
We report here on the radio continuum properties of the AMIGA sample with presentation organized as follows: Sect. 2 describes the radio surveys we used along with the (reprocessed) data and the final catalogs. Section 3 studies the radio continuum characteristics of the AMIGA sample including the correlation between radio and optical luminosities, spectral index, as well as comparison between NVSS and FIRST measures. The Radio Luminosity Function (RLF) and the power density are presented and compared with other galaxy samples in Sect. 4. Section 5 summarizes the main results.
Several radio surveys now cover a large fraction of the sky with
detection limits of a few mJy and spatial resolutions from a few
arcseconds to a few arcminutes. Four Northern sky surveys are
available: 1) the Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS) at
325 MHz; 2) the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) at 1.4 GHz; 3) the Faint
Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm survey (FIRST) at 1.4 GHz; and
4) the Green Bank surveys (GB6) at 4.8 GHz. We cross-correlated the
optically improved AMIGA positions (Leon & Verdes-Montenegro 2003)
with radio source positions from the above catalogs and further
increased detection fractions by reprocessing source extractions from
the calibrated data. Extractions were performed using the dedicated software
SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) with a threshold of 5-relative to the background. A summary of the data extracted from the
four surveys is given in Table 1. The
and
entries indicate respectively
the number of galaxies that were covered by each survey and the
number of detections.
Table 2 gives the radio flux density, the radio power, and
a code for the origin of the data according to the following list:
0 for no data, 1 for the original catalog (WENSS, NVSS, GB6), 2 for this work and 3 for NED.
Reference code 4 indicates FIRST detection without a corresponding
NVSS detection.
Upper limits are indicated by negative
values.
1420 MHz FIRST measures follow in parentheses the NVSS values.
Fluxes of the 8 galaxies detected with FIRST and
undetected with the NVSS are listed in Table 2 but are
not used in the analysis as explained in Sect. 2.3.
Radio power P was computed as
.
We used distances D from Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2005) with a
Hubble constant of H0 = 75 km s-1 Mpc-1 updated
with the newly available data from the bibliography.
The small number of sources without radio power values lack
redshifts. The next
subsections describe the four surveys used to characterize the
radio continuum properties of our sample.
We derived radio fluxes or upper limits for all galaxies in the CIG
but we focus our statistical analysis on the complete AMIGA subsample
described in Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2005).
We use in the present work
the same selection as described in Lisenfeld et al. (2007) (their Sect. 4.1):
(i) The subsample contains
galaxies with corrected Zwicky magnitudes in the range 11.0-15.0
for which we found
,
indicating 80-90% completeness;
(ii) Morphological revision of the sample, described in Sulentic et al. (2006),
identified 32 galaxies that are probably not isolated in the sense that they
might involve isolated interacting pairs and/or multiplets. These galaxies
are excluded from the most isolated sample studied further here;
(iii) We excluded two nearby dwarf ellipticals (CIG 663
Ursa Minor and
CIG 802
Draco) for which we only have upper limits for the radio fluxes,
and the inferred radio luminosities are very low.
This subsample (N = 719 galaxies)
will be referred to hereafter as the complete (AMIGA) subsample.
Table 1: Compiled data for the different radio continuum surveys.
Table 2: Radio flux density and power 325 MHz, 1.4 GHz and 4.8 GHz for the CIG sample.
The WENSS (Rengelink et al. 1997) survey was carried out with the Westerbork
Synthesis Radio Telescope at 325 MHz, except for objects with
that were observed at 352 MHz. Spatial resolution
is
with limiting flux sensitivity of
about 18 mJy (5-
). Astrometric accuracy was 1
5 for
strong sources (S > 150 mJy). We adopted a distance tolerance
of 35
which was chosen taking into account a conservative astrometry accuracy for
weak sources of
and adopting a
confidence radius
3 times that value. We found 39 WENSS
detections. Five more detections were included from the 352 MHz
polar catalog (CIG 66, 155, 363, 875 and 890).
We also downloaded and reprocessed source extractions for other
galaxies from the CIG that are within in the survey area. Flux
calibrations using the integrated SExtractor fluxes of catalog
sources show no significant differences from the WENSS
catalog values. A total of 49 sources were detected and 404 upper
limits derived. Five weak sources were not listed in the WENSS catalog
(CIG 336, 355, 663, 676 and 862) but are
detected at a 5- level using SExtractor, showing
a very weak emission (<18 mJy). The total flux for the extended source CIG 442
was
underestimated and recomputed
taking extended emission into account. The astrometry accuracy is
very high, the mean difference with respect to the CIG position
being
.
The dispersion in the
and
differences are respectively 6
4 and 9
3 which is about
6-9 times smaller than the WENSS spatial resolution.
![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison of the NVSS catalog flux (abscissa) at 1.4 GHz and the reprocessed fluxes for the CIG sources (ordinates). |
Open with DEXTER |
The NVSS survey (Condon et al. 1998) was made with the VLA at
1.4 GHz. Spatial resolution was
for North
of
,
covering the full CIG declination range.
Survey sensitivity is about 2 mJy implying that nearly all sources
detected with WENSS (assuming spectral index
)
will be detected by NVSS. Source positions in the catalog are given
with an accuracy ranging from <
for flux density S>15 mJy to about
for S<2.5 mJy.
We found 359 CIG sources in the NVSS catalog. Source extraction
using SExtractor with a 5-
threshold yielded 368 detections,
where 9 are not in the NVSS catalog or were recalibrated in
cases of extended or weak sources (CIG 324, 436, 442, 543, 559,
837, 869, 950, 988). CIG 199 was excluded from the catalog because
of corrupted data.
Comparison of fluxes derived from the NVSS catalog and our
reprocessing
(see Fig. 1)
indicates a high degree of
concordance except for an increasing dispersion and
underestimation towards fainter fluxes. These small differences are
probably due to the bias corrections applied to fluxes in the NVSS
catalog and which were not fully taken into account in the
reprocessed fluxes. This difference in calibration affects only the
few sources not listed in the NVSS catalog. In the case of very
extended sources (>
;
CIG 197, 435, 447, 461, 469, 610) we
have adopted fluxes given in the literature (NED).
In these cases, the total
flux was computed from a complete integration over the galaxy and
not only from some isolated peaks, as given by the NVSS for the
large and nearby galaxies. A final total of 374 galaxies are
included with 1.4 GHz radio continuum detections.
The mean difference
in
and
between the NVSS and our catalog positions
are small
.
The dispersion in the
and
differences are
respectively 6
9 and 7
2, which is comparable to the
WENSS astrometry given the similar spatial resolution.
![]() |
Figure 2: Detection rate at 1.4 GHz with NVSS as a function of Hubble type. |
Open with DEXTER |
FIRST (Becker et al. 1995)
was designed to produce the radio equivalent of the Palomar
Observatory Sky Survey over 10 000 square degrees of the North
Galactic Cap. The spatial resolution was 5
.
At the 1 mJy
source detection threshold there are
90 sources per square degree,
35% of which show resolved structure on scales from 2
to 30
.
We cross-correlated the FIRST catalog with our revised optical
positions, yielding 81 source detections.
The number of detections
was low and the data could not be used for statistical purposes. They
were however very useful for a comparison with NVSS data which allowed us to
infer the relative strengths of disk vs. nuclear emission in many
galaxies. Mean positional differences are small
with a dispersion of 1
6 and 2
0,
respectively.
We found 8 galaxies
that were detected in FIRST but not in the NVSS (CIG 236, 238, 258, 364, 544, 618,
678 and 749). Normally we expect the NVSS flux to be stronger than
the FIRST values because FIRST is only sensitive to compact (high
spatial frequency) radio emission. These sources showed fluxes near
the NVSS/FIRST detection limits and were not
further considered in our analysis.
The GB6 survey is a combination of two sets of observations made at
the Green Bank telescope in 1986 and 1987 (Gregory et al. 1996). The
sensitivity of the survey is similar to WENSS (18 mJy) but
the spatial resolution is considerably lower (3
5).
Identification of CIG detections in the GB6 catalog required a
threshold distance tolerance of about 1/2 of the FWHM, i.e. 85
which results in 17 detections. SExtractor source extraction with a
detection threshold of 5-
yields 42 detections within the 85
confidence radius. Comparison of our fluxes
with GB6 catalog values indicates a poorer
correlation. Discrepancies mainly arise from extended sources. The
large spatial resolution compared with the galaxy diameters
motivated a visual check of all detections in order to remove
possible cases of confusion.
A total of 32 galaxies were retained in our GB6 detection list, with
others determined to be fore-/back-ground.
Figure 2 shows the NVSS radio detection fraction as a function of morphological type (see Sulentic et al. 2006, for a description of the morphological types). It peaks in the Sb-Sc range (type T=3-5) which is the core of the AMIGA sample, comprising fully two thirds of our sample (see Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2005). Assuming that the radio continuum emission is driven by star formation, this is not surprising because these galaxies show the highest average star formation rates (Kennicutt et al. 1987). This is partially offset by the higher molecular/neutral gas fraction found in earlier types (Young & Knezek 1989) which may explain why the detection fraction drops so slowly towards types earlier than T=3 (Sb). This can be contrasted to the much more rapid drop in the FIR detection fraction found in Lisenfeld et al. (2007). Alternative explanations for the relatively high detection fraction of earlier types include: 1) Sb-c spirals misclassied as Sa-ab (T=1-2) due to low resolution imagery; 2) spirals misclassified as E/S0 (T= -5 to -2); and 3) the growing influence of radio emission unrelated to star formation in bona fide early types. The large fluctuation among the very late types likely involves small sample statistics.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Distribution of radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz
as a function of Hubble type. Only
detections are shown. The open triangles give the mean value of
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
In analogy to earlier papers in this series, Fig. 3
shows the
distribution of radio luminosities as a function of type for all
detections. In addition, we plot mean values including upper
limits which were derived using the Kaplan-Meier
survival analysis and calculated with the ASURV package (Lavalley et al. 1992).
Since the radio detection fraction is less than 50% for
all types the mean values lie quite low relative to the detections.
Note that the mean of
can be lower than the median of
.
The weakest known classical radio loud quasars (FRIIs: Sulentic et al.
2003) show radio luminosities near
and the strongest sources in this sample are 0.5 dex
below, with the majority of detected sources 1.5-2 dex below. With the
exception of a few of the strongest sources all luminosities are
consistent with nonthermal emission related to star formation.
Figure 3 can be compared with the equivalent for FIR emission
(Fig. 5 in Lisenfeld et al. 2007).
![]() |
Figure 4: Distribution of the 325 MHz ( top), 1.4 GHz ( bottom) and 4.8 GHz ( middle) radio power for the CIG sample. The dotted line indicates the completeness for a velocity of 9300 km s-1 (80% of the sample). The x-axis indicates the logarithm of the power in W Hz-1. |
Open with DEXTER |
The radio power distribution for the three radio bands is shown in Fig. 4.
The vertical dotted line indicates the radio power corresponding to
a completeness higher than 80% (i.e., more than 80% of the galaxies are
detected at the corresponding radio frequency). This line is
calculated based on the sensitivity of each survey, combined with
a recession velocity lower than 9300 km s-1 for 80% of the CIG galaxies.
We point out that the peak of the distribution for the NVSS data is above
the level of radio completeness, leading to a better confidence in the radio properties at that frequency.
Table 3 shows the mean value
of the radio power for each frequency using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis,
and the median value taking only detections into account. Note that
for the 325 MHz band, the 5 galaxies with data at 352 MHz are included.
The big difference between the median and mean values
reflects the large number of upper limits in the samples.
The number of galaxies per frequency band in the AMIGA sample
is indicated in the column
,
and the number of detections by
.
We compare the radio power distribution of the CIG sample with the one of the starforming galaxies selected from the UGC sample (UGC-SF) in Condon et al. (2002). They studied the radio and star formation properties of the entire Uppsala Galaxy Catalog (UGC). They distinguished between starforming galaxies and AGN in their study, finding that the starforming galaxy population may be evolving even at moderately low redshift. The AGN have been discarded of the control sample, following their classification. We recomputed the radio continuum power and the distances of the sample by using the same Hubble constant that for the CIG sample. The UGC-SF and the CIG samples are located in a very similar local volume.
To compute the mean value of the
radio continuum power for the UGC-SF, we used ASURV, as for the CIG sample, by
including the detections
and the upper limits. The corrected B magnitude, retrieved from the LEDA database, was
used for the UGC-SF sample. This photographic corrected magnitude is very
similar to the
magnitude of the CIG sample (see Fig. 6).
To be consistent with the CIG sample, we applied
a magnitude cut-off at mB =15 (see Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2005). Using the survival analysis package ASURV, the mean of
appears significantly higher than for the CIG sample (20.11), as shown in Table 3. The median values are computed using the detections.
The difference comes mainly from the upper-limits which are a much
larger fraction in the CIG sample than in the UGC-SF sample (see Table 3) with a detection rate of 43% and 90% resp.
for the CIG and UGC-SF samples.
Moreover the Fig. 5, showing the
distribution for both samples, indicates
that the UGC-SF sample has a larger population with high radio continuum power (
).
![]() |
Figure 5: Frequency distribution of the 1.4 GHz radio power for the CIG sample (solid line) compared with the frequency distribution of the UGC-SF sample (dashed line) of Condon et al. (2002). |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 3:
Average properties of the radio power, ,
for galaxies in the complete AMIGA sample and for the 1.4 GHz radiocontinuum emission of the UGC-SF sample (Condon et al. 2002).
Since our sample involves many of the most isolated galaxies (see Verley et al.
2007a, 2007b) in the
local Universe and, if radio emission is enhanced by interactions,
then we expect it to show very passive radio continuum properties
relative to almost any other local galaxy sample.
Figure 7 compares the radio/optical flux density ratio R defined as:
![]() |
(1) |
As expected, we find the galaxies in our sample to be very
radio-quiet relative to their optical luminosities. Generally, high
values of R (R > 100, e.g. Van Duyne et al. 2004) indicate
the presence of a radio quasar while values between 10 and 100 can arise
from a mix of Seyfert, LINER and starburst activity. Dusty galaxies with
above average internal extinction can also boost some normal galaxies
into this range. The dominance of low-R galaxies (R < 10) in our
sample indicates that the radio emission from star formation
is responsible for the majority of the detections.
The KISS sample (Van Duyne et al. 2004) represents a good
counterpoint with most of the galaxies showing R > 10.
Only three galaxies in our sample show R >100 (CIG 187, 349 and 836).
CIG 187 has an underlying background source while CIG 349 is
classified as LINER/Sy1.5 and is almost certainly an interacting/merger system.
CIG 836 is a relatively high redshift E galaxy
( = 14 900 km s-1) and is outside our complete sample. 17% of the
Van Duyne et al. (2004) sample show R>100. If we consider the 11 galaxies
with R > 30 in our sample, we find: a) at least one background source; b) 3-5
interacting sources; and c) 4-5 AGN/LINER galaxies.
Isolated examples of
category c) may represent rare examples of self stimulated AGN activity (via bars?)
or cases where stimulation by an accretion event left no morphological signature.
![]() |
Figure 6: Optical luminosity distribution in B for the CIG (solid line) and the UGC-SF (dashed line) sample. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Radio flux density at 1.4 GHz (mJy) vs. apparent B magnitude. The lines represent constant radio-to-optical ratio R. The dashed line shows the value of R corresponding to the NVSS sensitivity level (2 mJy). In order not to overload the figure, we show only detections. The radio continuum upper limits were however taken into account in the calculation of the mean values. The plus signs denote galaxies within the complete AMIGA subsample and the crosses indicate galaxies outside this subsample. |
Open with DEXTER |
We compare the R distribution of the CIG with the one of the UGC-SF sample of Condon et al. (2002).
Figure 8 shows little differences between the
two samples: the R distribution of the CIG is sharper than the one of the
UGC-SF sample. This later has
more important wings, especially an excess for the large R (
). The median value of 4.38
for R of the UGC-SF sample is just slightly larger than the one of the CIG sample (4.19). Figure 6
shows the optical luminosity LB distribution for the CIG and the UGC-SF sample where it appears that the UGC-SF sample is slightly brighter in the
B band than the CIG sample. The similar value of R between both samples is consistent with the higher radiocontinuum and LB
for the UGC-SF than for the CIG. The difference for the star formation activity
is minimal between both samples, nevertheless the UGC-SF sample has a larger fraction of galaxies with more
intense star formation per optical luminosity unit.
Our sample contains a relatively small fraction of early-type E/S0
galaxies (14%) reflecting the expectation of the morphology-density
relation. In principle AMIGA provides the last point on the
low density end of that correlation. The low number of early-types
precludes a statistically meaningful comparison of mean R values for
early- and late-type subsamples. Figure 8 suggests a
slight difference between their R distributions, with median values
R=7.7 and 4.4 for early- and late-type galaxies, respectively. The
R distribution for E/S0 galaxies shows two peaks which may reflect a
true early-type population and a second population of spirals
misclassified as E/S0. If both peaks represent early-types then the
higher R values would be surprising and difficult to understand if
due to star formation activity. We checked whether either the
radio powers or optical magnitudes for these galaxies had
unusual values and found radio powers in the 1021-1023 W Hz-1range - overlapping the radio power range of FRI but not
FRII (broad emission line) quasars. Absolute magnitudes in B
were generally fainter than -21 (except for CIG 893 which was
flagged in our morphological reclassification, in Sulentic et al. 2006,
as a candidate interacting system). If confirmed as E and/or S0 galaxies,
these very isolated systems would represent one of the most intriguing
parts of the AMIGA sample.
![]() |
Figure 8: Distribution of the radio-to-optical ratio R (logarithmic scale) for the CIG sample (solid line). The elliptical and spiral galaxy distribution are represented respectively by black and grey shaded areas.The dashed line shows the R distribution for the UGC-SF sample (Condon et al. 2002). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Left: radio power at 1.4 GHz vs. absolute optical magnitude for the Sb-Sc galaxies together with the fitted line obtained using ASURV. The full line gives the bisector fit. We also plot the fit assumming MB as the independent variable (dotted line) for direct comparison with the fit (dashed line) for the KISS starburst galaxies in Van Duyne et al. (2004). Detections are indicated by crosses while upper limits in radio emission by arrows. Right: radio power at 1.4 GHz vs. absolute optical magnitude for the detected E-S0 (filled squares), Sa-Sab (filled triangles) and Scd-Irr (filled circles) galaxies. The upper limits are indicated with arrows of the same color. The lines correspond to the same fits as in the left panel. |
Open with DEXTER |
The relationship between optical and radio continuum properties of galaxies in our sample can also be evaluated by studying the absolute B magnitude vs. log radio power (W Hz-1) correlation. The most useful information comes from using the 1.4 GHz data where the detection fraction was highest (Fig. 9). We use both detections and upper limits (employing survival analysis techniques) for calculation of radio continuum properties. The relation between radio continuum power and absolute B magnitude was derived using the Schmidt method (see Feigelson & Nelson 1985) as implemented in the ASURV package. A random distribution of upper limits is required for application of survival analysis techniques. In our case, the upper limit distribution of the radio power is assumed random because it was computed from a flux limited distribution combined with a random distribution of galaxy distances. We get the following relations for the complete subsample taking MB as the independent variable:
![]() |
(2) | ||
![]() |
(3) | ||
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
(5) | ||
![]() |
(6) | ||
![]() |
(7) |
![]() |
(8) |
![]() |
(9) |
It is interesting that almost all radio continuum detections of early-types lie above the best fit relation (Fig. 9, right). If the spiral majority shows radio emission related to star formation, then this offset is likely telling us that radio emission in early-types has a different origin. Figure 9 (left) shows that the CIG sample has a lower radio power than Van Duyne et al. (2004) over a similar absolute magnitude range. This is another manifestation of the strong difference between an emission line selected sample and our sample of isolated galaxies. Since no selection was made in the Van Duyne et al. sample in terms of the environment, it is a reasonable assumption that it involves both interacting systems and galaxies in generally higher density environments. The two samples show no sources in common.
The NVSS and FIRST surveys were obtained with different VLA
configurations, resulting in different effective resolutions and,
more importantly, in diminished spatial frequency sensitivity
(scales larger than 30
)
for FIRST.
Comparing NVSS and FIRST observations of the same source then
provides insights about the spatial distribution of emission in a
galaxy. FIRST will largely sample only compact (likely nuclear)
emission while NVSS will detect both nuclear and disk emission from
galaxies in our sample. If low level star formation dominates the
radio emission from most of our galaxies, then we expect NVSS fluxes
to be larger than corresponding FIRST fluxes for our sample. A
strong FIRST detection might indicate an active nucleus; these
sources, expected to be rare in an isolated sample like AMIGA, will
be discussed in a companion paper (Sabater et al. 2008).
The much smaller FIRST detection fraction (14% vs. 35%
for NVSS) immediately tells us what to expect - a
sample dominated by disk star formation. FIRST fluxes are smaller
than NVSS values in almost all sources. Most galaxies with a FIRST detection are Sb-Sc spirals, which represent 2/3 of the entire
isolated population. This detection fraction suggests that more than half of
our NVSS detected galaxies have disk-dominated radio continuum
emission at 1.4 GHz because they are fully attenuated by FIRST.
Figure 10 shows the FIRST/NVSS flux ratio
distribution for our sample.
About 40% of the galaxies detected by FIRST show core-dominated
emission at 1.4 GHz, which implies 20% of core-dominated
galaxies in our sample. The radio continuum emission in
core-dominated galaxies may originate either from nuclear SF or from
an active nucleus. That question is addressed in Sabater et al. (2008).
We note that Menon (1995), using VLA B- and C- configurations at 1.4 GHz, found that 46/56 radio detected members of compact galaxy groups showed compact core radio emission. Figure 11 compares the cumulative distribution function of FIRST/NVSS flux ratios for AMIGA and the Menon (1995) compact group sample - a striking comparison of nature vs. nurture in the radio domain. The CDF comparison shows that only 13% of compact groups have a ratio lower than 0.5, while 36% are found for the CIGs. This shows that isolated galaxies have a more disk-dominated radio emission than galaxies in groups where extreme interaction effects are expected.
![]() |
Figure 10: Histogram of the flux ratio between the FIRST and NVSS detections for the CIGs. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: Cumulative distribution of the FIRST/NVSS flux ratio for the CIG (solid line) and the center/total flux ratio (dotted line) from Menon (1995). |
Open with DEXTER |
In the past few decades many researchers have studied the radio
continuum properties of different samples, including derivations of
the RLF. A large fraction of these studies have involved flux limited
samples useful for studying the evolution of the RLF.
The 1.4 GHz NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) showed that radio evolution is
largely luminosity independent with strong cosmological evolution at all
luminosities (Condon 1984, 1989). Benn et al. (1993) found that
faint radio sources (
mJy) are dominated by starforming
galaxies with only a small fraction showing Seyfert type emission.
AGN dominate the bright end of the radio distribution. Galaxies from an
IRAS flux-limited sample (
Jy) were cross-matched
with the NVSS (Yun et al. 2001), revealing that FIR-selected galaxies
can account for the entire population of late-type field galaxies in
the local Universe. Radio emission in these galaxies is mainly produced
by star formation.
One of the most
recent radio continuum studies for a large sample involves the 2 degree Field Galaxy Survey (2dFGSDR2) cross-correlated with the NVSS
for galaxies brighter than K = 12.75 (Sadler et al. 2002). Using
2dF spectra, they found that 60% of the sources involve dominance of
star formation and 40% AGN. Interpretation of all of these surveys is
clouded by the uncertain role of environment. The AMIGA sample has the
potential to clarify this role by providing a nurture-free
local sample, large enough to permit evaluation as a function of source morphology
and luminosity.
The local RLF of the CIG sample is useful
in order
to get more insight into the cosmological evolution
of the radio emission in isolated galaxies, as well
as to compare them with other galaxy populations in the local Universe.
We only compute the local RLF at 1.4 GHz, for which we can get an accurate statistics thanks to
the large number of detections. To compute the RLF we follow the prescription given by Xu & Sulentic (1991).
Since the CIG sample is optically selected, the RLF is derived from the OLF
and the fractional bivariate function between the radio and optical luminosity. The OLF
was estimated by Verdes-Montenegro
et al. (2005) using the
test (Schmidt 1968) which indicates a high level of completeness for the CIG. The RLF is then
calculated for that complete
subsample.
The differential RLF
gives the number of galaxies per unit volume and per unit
interval. It is derived as follows:
![]() |
(10) |
![]() |
(11) |
Table 4: Bivariate (optical, radio) luminosity function for the CIG sample.
![]() |
Figure 12:
RLF at 1.4 GHz for the CIG sample (triangles) with 1-![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 12 shows a comparison of the CIG RLF with other samples.
Except for the AGN sample of Condon et al. (2002), all
samples have a relatively similar RLF at low
radio power (
). The radio emission of these galaxies
showing a similar contribution to the local density of the RLF is dominated by SF.
At larger radio power, the 2dFGRS sample from Sadler et al. (2002) and AGN/UGC dominate the radio contribution, that is, the radio power is coming mainly from the AGN-powered galaxies.
The CIG RLF decreases below the AGN dominated samples for powers higher than
W Hz-1, in very good coincidence with samples powered by SF. Thus, the radio
emission from the CIG sample is mainly powered by SF and the AGN contribution is very low, as confirmed
by Sabater et al. (2008).
Table 5: RLF at 1.4 GHz for the CIG sample.
The Schechter formalism to describe the luminosity function (Press & Schechter 1974) was initially
developed to explain the luminosity function of galaxies based on the cosmological evolution of the
clustering of matter in the Universe. Its application to radio frequencies (e.g. Yun et al. 2001;
Serjeant et al. 2002) is a powerful tool to compare the distribution of various
kinds of radio sources and to parametrize their evolution. The Schechter function for a RLF
is the following:
![]() |
(12) |
The
parameter is quite uncertain because of the relative larger errors of the bright end data.
Yun et al. (2001) found that fitting their RLF with a sum of two Schechter functions gives a better fit.
We tried such decomposition for the CIG sample, and the
was not improved but increased. It shows the limit
of the application of the Schechter formalism to the RLF, developed to model the mass distribution
of the sub-structures in the formation of the galaxies.
Yun et al. (2001) noted that their decomposition fits two different galaxy populations: one normal, late-type field
galaxies, and a second composed of starburst and luminous infrared galaxies. It appears that the ``field'' galaxies of the
IRAS-2 Jy sample have a closer Schechter decomposition to the CIG population than the starburst galaxies with
W Hz-1 and
.
The lower power-law slope of the CIG compared to the
UGC-SF sample indicates that
the CIG sample has a larger population of low luminosity galaxies. The same conclusion arises from the lower
value than the IRAS-2 Jy, since they have a comparable power-law slope.
Table 6: Schechter function for the RLF at 1.4 GHz.
We chose to compute the total radio power density from the RLF at 1.4 GHz rather than from the Schechter fit,
since
the parameters of the Schechter fit would give the total power density as
for a larger range than the available radio data.
Given the uncertainties on the parameters and the extrapolation of the formula, we preferred to compute
only on the radio power
range of the RLF.
The results for the CIG and the other samples considered from the bibliography are given in
Table 7: the radio power density for each sample is
computed for a Hubble constant of H0 = 75 km s-1.
The CIG sample has, by far, the lowest contribution (
W Hz-1 Mpc-3) in the Local Universe
to the radio continuum emission at 1.4 GHz. Its contribution is 30% of the
total power density of the IRAS-2 Jy sample
and 6% compared to the 2dFGRS, which covers a redshift range of z = 0.005 to 0.438 and has 60% of active galaxies and 40% of starforming
galaxies (Sadler et al. 2002). The difference of the
total radio luminosity between the UGC and IRAS-2 Jy samples is mainly due to the
lower faint end of the later one.
It appears clearly that the galaxies hosting an AGN are dominating the sources
emitting at 1.4 GHz.
The low contribution of the CIG galaxies to the total radio power density is the combination of
two effects: (i) a slightly lower radio emission of the individual galaxies, in comparison to other environments,
as shown for the mean
in comparison to the UGC-SF sample of Condon et al. (2002); and (ii) a low number density
of isolated galaxies in the local Universe.
Table 7: Radio power density.
This paper is part of a series designed to characterize the ISM in a sample of the most isolated galaxies in the local Universe. We are establishing multiwavelength baselines or zero-point levels for the stellar content and the different components of the ISM against which samples in different environments can be compared and interpreted. Radio continuum emission that arises from either star formation or active nuclei should be at the lowest ``natural'' level in the AMIGA sample. We analyzed radio continuum emission at three frequencies: 325 MHz, 1.4 and 4.8 GHz using data from the WENSS, NVSS, FIRST and GB6 surveys.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referee for a careful reading and very detailed report which helped to improve this paper significantly. S.L., L.V.M., J.S.M., D.E., U.L., S.V., G.B. and E.G. are partially supported by DGI Grant AYA 2005-07516-C02 and Junta de Andalucía (Spain). S.L. was partially supported by an Averroes Fellowship contract from the Junta de Andalucía. U.L. is supported by a Ramon y Cajal fellowship contract and acknowledges support from the DGI grant ESP2003-00915. G.B. is supported at the IAA/CSIC by an I3P contract (I3P-PC2005-F) funded by the European Social Fund. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.