A&A 477, 517-520 (2008)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078781
W. D. Cotton1 - W. Jaffe2 - G. Perrin3 - J. Woillez4
1 - National Radio Astronomy
Observatory,
520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475, USA
2 - Leiden Observatory, Neils BohrWeg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
3 - Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, UMR 8109, 92190 Meudon, France
4 - W. M. Keck Observatory, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI
96743, USA
Received 2 October 2007 / Accepted 6 November 2007
Abstract
We present the results of observations of the AGN in the Seyfret
galaxy NGC 1068 at 43 GHz (7 mm wavelength) with 50 mas resolution.
The results are consistent with the claim of Gallimore et al. (2004) that
the nuclear component is dominated by thermal emission.
This adds to the growing body of evidence that this component is
dominated by a hot inner region of the obscuring torus rather than the
base of the radio jet.
However, possible detection of linear polarization from this component
suggests some emission from the synchrotron emitting jet or that the polarization arises from Thompson scattering of
the thermal emission by the nuclear plasma.
Key words: Galaxy: nucleus - radio continuum: galaxies
The viewing angle has two effects. If the system is viewed pole on, shorter wavelength radiation escapes through the opening in the torus and the UV and broad emission lines are very easily visible. Emission from the highly relativistic jet, primarily radio and millimeter emission, is strongly amplified by Doppler boosting. Objects of this type are referred to as type 1 AGNs. If the system is viewed edge-on, the central region is obscured by the dust in the torus and the UV and broad emission lines are not seen. This is a type 2 AGN.
The AGN in the Seyfret 2 galaxy NGC 1068 has long been well studied at a
number of wavebands (Davies et al. 2006; Krips et al. 2006; Gallimore et al. 1996a,b; Jaffe et al. 2004; Muxlow et al. 1996; Galliano et al. 2005; Guainazzi et al. 2000; Gallimore et al. 2004; Marco & Alloin 2000; Galliano & Alloin 2002).
NGC 1068 is relatively nearby (14.4 Mpc,
pc) so it can be
studied with very good linear resolution.
In the radio, an exhaustive study of NGC 1068 has been carried out by
Gallimore et al. (1996a,2004,1996b).
The relativistic jet is prominent in radio emission and extends for
several kpc in either direction.
The jet undergoes an abrupt change of direction about 0.2
from the
nucleus in a region of bright radio and line emission.
This change of direction is presumed to be the result of an
interaction with a molecular cloud.
Significant near- and mid-IR emission is associated with the inner
radio jet (Galliano et al. 2005; Marco & Alloin 2000; Jaffe et al. 2004)
which is presumed to the the result of shock heating of the dust in
the ISM values by the passage of the jet.
Long term variability in the IR is shown by Glass (2004)
indicating variable output from the central engine.
Further evidence for jet-ISM interaction is from Axon et al. (1997) who
show that the ISM is in a higher ionization state near the radio jet.
The work of Gallimore et al. (1996b), Gallimore et al. (1996a) and
Gallimore et al. (2004) establish their component S1 as the site of the
central engine.
This component has an inverted spectrum characteristic of optically
thick synchrotron emission commonly seen in powerful AGN nuclei.
However, they argue on the basis of observed brightness temperature,
105 K too low to be opaque synchrotron, and morphology, the
emission appears in a disk orthogonal to the direction of the jet,
that this source is dominated by thermal emission from the inner
portion of the torus.
This is supported by the observations of
masers
(Gallimore et al. 2001) nearly spatially coincident with the continuum
emission.
masers are tracers of relatively dense, warm molecular gas.
In contrast, Krips et al. (2006) interprete their results as showing a
turnover in a synchrotron spectrum.
The high resolution mid-IR results of Jaffe et al. (2004) show large amounts of hot dust on similar size scales to the radio continuum which further supports the interpretation of this component as the inner region of the torus. The possible detection of linear polarization at 15 and 22 GHz by Gallimore et al. (1996b) has been interpreted as indicating that at least some of the emission has a synchrotron origin.
Recent work by Blundell & Kuncic (2007) on radio quiet quasars suggest that the radio emission from these objects in radio quiescent phases is dominated by optically thin thermal emission from an accretion disk wind rather than an opaque synchrotron source. These authors suggest that this may be a more general property of AGNs.
The bulk of the torus appears as a broad ring with a radius of several
arc-seconds (80 pc) as seen in
emission (Galliano & Alloin 2002) and
near-IR continuum (Marco & Alloin 2000).
The lack of Br
emission suggests this material is shielded
from the UV radiation field.
In the following, we present new VLA (Thompson et al. 1980) observations at 43 GHz at 50 mas resolution.
The photometric calibration was based on the source J1331+305 (3C286) assuming a flux density of 1.45 Jy. Since J1331+305 is significantly resolved, only the inner three antennas on each arm were used to determine the flux density of the secondary photometric calibrator J0239-025 (0.70 Jy). Photometric calibration used 30 s vector averaging to reduce the effect of short term phase noise. The atmospheric opacity was measured in two tipping scans near the beginning and end of the observations; the two measurements were consistent at 0.08 nepers and this correction was used for all data. Corrections were also made using a standard gain curve for the VLA antennas.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Total intensity contours of NGC 1068 with superposed
polarization E-vectors with lengths proportional to the bias corrected
polarized flux density.
Contours are at powers of ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The instrumental polarization was determined from observations of J2202+422, J0238+166, J0319+415, J0242+110, and J0239-025. The polarization angle calibration was based on imaging of 1331+305 and using the sum of the Stokes Q and U CLEAN components. Similar treatment of J2202+422 gave reasonably consistent results.
After applying external calibration, the data on NGC 1068 were further adjusted using three iterations of phase self calibration. The final image includes 47.9 mJy of flux density. External calibration used the NRAO AIPS package (Greisen 1998) and self calibration and imaging used the Obit package (http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~bcotton/Obit.html).
Imaging used a weighting based on a Briggs robust parameter of 0 and a grid of pixels with a 10 mas spacing. This weighting is a good compromise between sensitivity and resolution. The data were imaged and de-convolved using the CLEAN algorithm in Stokes I, Q and U (for a description of CLEAN see Cornwell et al. 1999). The CLEAN restoring beam was a circular Gaussian with FWHM of 50 mas.
The derived image of NGC 1068 is shown in Fig. 1.
In this figure and in the following discussion we will adopt the
component nomenclature of Gallimore et al. (1996b).
The off-source RMS noise in the Stokes I, Q and U images is 180 Jy/beam.
Table 1: Fitted elliptical Gaussian component parameters.
![]() |
Figure 2: Spectra of the components from data presented here and from the literature. Quoted error bars are plotted but are generally smaller than the symbols used. |
Open with DEXTER |
At the resolution and surface brightness sensitivity of Fig. 1, only the regions of brightest emission are visible and none of the underlying jet shown by Gallimore et al. (1996b). Elliptical Gaussians were fitted to the components and these are given in Table 1.
Interpretation of the spectrum of the nuclear component shown in
Fig. 2c is further complicated by the likelihood of
variability.
There is considerable scatter in this plot.
Variation in the output of the central engine is seen in the
variations of the
masers by Gallimore et al. (2001) and
in the IR by Glass (2004).
The polarized signal at the peak of component S1 is 3.4 times the noise in Q and U and 6.2% of the total Stokes I. The orientation of the polarization vector is roughly perpendicular to the direction of the jet. If this is a real detection from optically thin synchrotron emission, then the magnetic field is oriented along the jet as is common in such sources.
The polarized signal at the peak of component NE is also 3.4 times
the noise in Q and U and 10% of the total Stokes I.
In this case, the polarization angle is roughly at 45
to the
direction of the jet.
In neither case is the detection of polarized emission beyond doubt,
but the alignment of peaks in polarized emission with those is total
intensity is encouraging.
If the polarization in Component S1 is real, an intriguing alternative to synchrotron emission is polarization of the thermal radiation by Thompson scattering as was suggested for X-ray polarization by Angel (1969). The dominant thermal emission indicates considerable plasma to do the scattering. This means of polarization depends on asymmetries in the source which is not implausible in this case. A further consideration is that if there is a dense circum-nuclear plasma, it is very likely that Faraday depolarization will reduce any polarized emission coming from the nucleus.
The spectrum shown in Fig. 2c is consistent with a thermal source which is optically thick below 5 GHz (note upper limit at 1.4 GHz) and is relatively flat at higher frequencies. The claim of a dominant optically thick synchrotron source by Krips et al. (2006) appears not to be supported by Fig. 2c. The brightness temperature and spectrum of the nuclear component (S1) are in general agreement with the model of Blundell & Kuncic (2007) in which the nuclear emission is dominated by thermal emission from a hot wind from the accretion disk.
The higher resolution data from Gallimore et al. (2004) shows that the
bulk of the emission comes from a linear feature roughly orthogonal
to the direction of the jet and approximately co-spatial with masers thought to inhabit the inner region of the torus.
The fit to the data presented here given in Table 1
suggest a somewhat larger source whose principle elongation is along
the jet;
although, the significance of the orientation is unclear as the model
fitted is nearly round.
The difference with the results of Gallimore et al. (2004) at 8.4 GHz is
likely due to the differences in resolution; Fig. 2c suggests that much of the flux density is resolved
out at 8.4 GHz.
The high resolution mid-IR observations of Jaffe et al. (2004) show hot dust emission coincident with, and on a size scale comparable to, Component S1. This is also consistent with this being the inner region of the obscuring torus.
The possible detection of linear polarization both in the present work and by Gallimore et al. (2004) suggest that either not all of the emission is thermal or that the polarization is the result of Thompson scattering in the thermal plasma. The apparent polarization at 43 GHz of 6%, if real and due to synchrotron emission, would put an lower limit of 10% on the nonthermal fraction. Differential Faraday rotation in the circum-nuclear plasma is likely to reduce any linearly polarized emission.
The flux densities of the other components are consistent with an
extrapolation of an optically thin synchrotron.
At component C, the jet bends and
line emission reported by Galliano & Alloin (2002) and Davies et al. (2006) as
well as the presence of
masers, support the claim by
Gallimore et al. (1996b) that the jet is diverted by interaction with a
molecular cloud.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for making suggestions leading to the improvement of this paper.