A&A 477, 665-670 (2008)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078085
M. A. Barucci1 - S. Fornasier1,2 - E. Dotto3 - P. L. Lamy4 - L. Jorda4 - O. Groussin4 - J. R. Brucato5 - J. Carvano6 - A. Alvarez-Candal1 - D. Cruikshank7 - M. Fulchignoni1,2
1 - LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon Principal
Cedex, France
2 - Université Paris Diderot, Paris VII, France
3 - INAF,
Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00040
Monteporzio Catone, Roma, Italy
4 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique
de Marseille, BP 8, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France
5 - INAF,
Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, via Moiariello 16, 80131
Napoli, Italy
6 - Observatorio National (COAA), rua Gal. José
Cristino 77, CEP20921-400 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
7 - NASA Ames
Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA
Received 14 June 2007 / Accepted 3 October 2007
Abstract
Aims. The aim of this paper is to investigate the surface composition of the two asteroids 21 Lutetia and 2867 Steins, targets of the Rosetta space mission.
Methods. We observed the two asteroids through their full rotational periods with the Infrared Spectrograph of the Spitzer Space Telescope to investigate the surface properties. The analysis of their thermal emission spectra was carried out to detect emissivity features that diagnose the surface composition.
Results. For both asteroids, the Christiansen peak, the Reststrahlen, and the Transparency features were detected. The thermal emissivity shows a clear analogy to carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, in particular to the CO-CV types for 21 Lutetia, while for 2867 Steins, already suggested as belonging to the E-type asteroids, the similarity to the enstatite achondrite meteorite is confirmed.
Key words: minor planets, asteroids - techniques: spectroscopic - methods: observational
We briefly summarize the properties of these two asteroids as
presently known, based on the recent review article by Barucci et al. (2007). Asteroid 2867 Steins is a small asteroid whose
knowledge is still limited. The first spectroscopic observations
(Barucci et al. 2005) suggested a similarity between Steins and
E-type asteroids, a rare class of objects with properties similar
to the enstatite meteorites. Similar results have been obtained
recently by Fornasier et al. (2007) and by Nedelcu et al. (2007a).
Fornasier et al. (2006), using polarimetric technique, determined
for the first time the
albedo value of
,
a high value that implies a diameter of
approximately 4.6
km and confirms the E-type classification.
Asteroid 21 Lutetia, a large object with a diameter of about 100
km, has a V+NIR spectral behaviour similar to the carbonaceous
chondrites (Birlan et al. 2004; Barucci et al. 2005;
Birlan et al. 2006; Nedelcu et al. 2007b), but an IRAS albedo
(
,
Tedesco & Veeder 1992) that is not compatible
with C-type asteroids, which are associated to this type of
meteorite. Instead, the IRAS albedo leads Lutetia to be classified
as an M-type asteroid, suggesting a metallic composition.
Nevertheless several different albedo values have been published.
A lower albedo 0.09-0.10 has been estimated from ground-based
polarimetric measurements (Zellner et al. 1977; Lupisko & Mohamed
1996), while a high value of
was given by Mueller et al. (2006) with thermal-infrared observations. Other intermediate
values of
have been obtained by Magri et al. (1999)
using a shape modelled by new radar observations, and
by Carvano et al. (2007) analysing recent
thermal-infrared observations.
We now report on far-infrared observations of these two asteroids carried out with the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) of the Spitzer space telescope (SST) in a series of companion articles that allow us to discuss and try to solve some controversies before the Rosetta fly-bys. A detailed account of the observations, data processing, and results on the size, the albedo, and the thermal properties are presented in Lamy et al. (2007a,b). The present article analyses the emissivity spectra and discusses the mineralogical composition and the classification of the two Rosetta asteroid targets.
2867 Steins and 21 Lutetia were observed with the IRS spectrograph
which covers the wavelength range 5.2-38.0 m in four
long-slit segments: the short wavelength, 2nd order (SL2, from 5.2 to 8.5
m); the short wavelength, 1st order (SL1, from 7.4 to
14.2
m); the long wavelength, 2nd order (LL2, from 14.0 to
21.5
m); and the long wavelength, 1st order (LL1, from 19.5
to 38.0
m). The observations of 2867 Steins were carried out
on 22 November 2005 from 06:23 to 13:18 UT, catching 14 full range
(5-38
m), low resolution spectra that covered the asteroid'
s full rotational period of
h (Kuppers et al.
2007). All the spectra were acquired with single ramps of 14.68 s,
except for the SL1 segment where we used a 6.29 s ramp. The
observations were carried out when the asteroid was at
heliocentric distance of 2.13 AU, 1.60 AU far away from SPITZER
and seen with a phase angle of 27.2
.
![]() |
Figure 1: Individual emissivity spectra of 21 Lutetia acquired on 10 December 2005 from 17:32 UT to 11 December 2006 02:27 UT (the UT time corresponds to the start of the exposure). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Individual emissivity spectra of 2867 Steins acquired on 22 November 2005 from 06:23 to 13:11, UT time (the UT time corresponds to the start of the exposure). |
Open with DEXTER |
Lutetia was observed from 17:32 UT on 10 December 2005 to 02:27 on
11 December 2005, obtaining 14 individual full wavelength range
spectra covering the rotational period of
h
(Zappalà et al. 1984). An exposure time of 6.29 s was used for
each of the 4 spectral segments. The observations were carried out
when the asteroid was at a heliocentric
distance of 2.81 AU, 2.66 AU far away from Spitzer and seen with a phase angle of 21.1
.
Data reduction of the Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) was provided by the Spitzer pipeline (http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/documents/SOM/irs60.pdf and http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irs/dh/~IrsPDDmar30.pdf); background correction by differencing the 2 nodding positions was performed using SPICE, the Spitzer IRS Custom Extraction software. More details on the acquisition and data reduction steps are reported in Lamy et al. (2007a).
To interpret the infrared spectra, the thermal model (Groussin et al. 2004) was used and all the details are presented in Lamy et al. (2007a,b). The thermal balance on the surface includes the
solar flux received by the object, on the one hand, the
re-radiated flux and the heat conduction, on the other. The solar
flux depends mainly on the albedo, the re-radiated flux on the
beaming factor, and the heat conduction on the thermal inertia. We
used a visible geometric albedo of
for Steins and
for Lutetia, a thermal inertia of
100 J/K/m2/s0.5 for Steins, and
25 J/K/m2/s0.5 for
Lutetia, and a beaming factor
for both asteroids,
consistent with Lamy et al. (2007a,b).
Using the above parameters, we calculated the infrared spectral energy distribution (SED) of Steins and Lutetia. The SED is normalized to the SST data using a multiplicative coefficient, which corresponds to the change in cross-section as a function of time (light curve). Each spectrum observed by SST is then divided by the normalized SED to obtain the emissivity as a function of wavelength. The 14 individual emissivity spectra of 21 Lutetia and 2867 Steins are presented in Figs. 1 and 2.
We investigated the differences between the individual spectra for
each asteroid by a -squared value defined as:
![]() |
(1) |
To interpret the resulting emissivity of both targets in terms of their composition, we compared the mean emissivity (the average of the 14 observed spectra) with a wide sample of laboratory spectra of minerals and meteorites (Dotto et al. 2000, 2004; Barucci et al. 2002; Salisbury et al. 1991a,b; ASTER spectral library on http://speclib.jpl.nasa.gov; Relab database http://lf314-rlds.geo.brown.edu).
As thoroughly discussed by Salisbury (1993), the most diagnostic
spectral characteristics in the analysed wavelength range are the
Christiansen peak, the Reststrahlen, and Transparency features.
The Christiansen peak is related to the mineralogy and grain size,
and for silicates it occurs between 8 and 9.5 m, just before
the Si-O stretching vibration bands. Reststrahlen bands are due to
vibrational modes of molecular complexes, and for silicates they
occur in the 8-25
m region. The Transparency features are
volume scattering features of fine particulates, and they form
troughs between the main Reststrahlen bands. At a small grain
size, volume scattering occurs and Transparency features are
observable due to a loss of photons crossing many grains.
The spectral behaviour of Lutetia, shown at the top of Fig. 3,
appears to be consistent with that of carbonaceous chondrites,
which exhibit the Christiansen peak at distinctively long
wavelengths (Salisbury et al. 1991b). After analysing a large
sample of meteorites taken from the RELAB and ASTER databases, we
report in Fig. 3 a comparison with the carbonaceous chondrite
Allende (CV type), which shows a very good spectroscopic match.
The emissivity spectrum of the meteorite Odessa is also reported
as an example. Odessa is an iron meteorite that contains some
silicate inclusions. The spectral behaviour is completely
different from that of Lutetia, so the possible metallic nature
for this asteroid is rejected. A 10 m emission feature,
together with a broad emissivity structure between about 16 and 28
m, has been found in the emissivity spectra of Trojan
asteroids observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Emery et al.
2006). They propose
that the Trojan emission spectra may
best be explained by a very underdense surface structure
consisting of particles of just a few microns
in size or by very small mineral and carbonaceous particles
suspended in a matrix material that is
relatively transparent in the mid-infrared. However, the detailed shape of the spectra and the C,
R, and T features are
different in the Trojans than in the data presented
here.
Table 1: Residuals of each individual emissivity spectrum compared to the mean flux of the 14 spectra.
To better investigate the primitive nature of 21 Lutetia and its
similarity with carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, we compared the
Spitzer spectrum with laboratory spectra of different samples at
different grain sizes published by Barucci et al. (2002). The
Lutetia emissivity spectrum matches very well the emissivity
spectrum of Ornans meteorites, a CO3 type carbonaceous chondritic
(Barucci et al. 2002), with grains in a size range smaller than
20 m. In fact, the peak at about 9.3
m in the emissivity
spectrum of Lutetia is consistent with the Christiansen peak of
the Ornans meteorite, and the plateau between 9 and 12
m is
consistent with the Reststrahlen features, as well as the
Transparency band around 13
m.
The match of the mid-infrared spectrum
of Lutetia with that of Ornans, which suffered aqueous alteration
processes (Zolensky & McSween 1988), confirms the primitive
chondritic character of this asteroid already proposed by Barucci
et al. (2005) and Birlan et al. (2004, 2006) on the basis of
ground-based observations. In fact, the visible and near-infrared
spectra are very similar to those of CO3 or CV3 type meteorites,
with a stronger similarity to the Vigarano (CV3 type) meteorite.
Since few data in far-infrared region on asteroid analogue
materials with different grain sizes exist in the literature, we
performed new laboratory experiments for Vigarano using the Bruker
IFS66v interferometer at the INAF Astronomical Capodimonte
Observatory (Italy). We used the same equipment and the same
conditions as was previously used to obtain the Ornans data
(Barucci et al. 2002), and the results are reported in Fig. 4.
Also, Vigarano with small grain size (0-20 m) fits the
Lutetia spectrum well as shown by the correspondence of the
Christiansen, Reststrahlen, and Transparency features. The
Vigarano sample is characterised by the presence of aqueous
alterations in its matrix. The close similarity to CO3 and CV3
meteorites containing hydrous mineral, suggests
that Lutetia underwent some aqueous alteration. This result confirms
what has
already been inferred by Rivkin et al. (2000) by the detection of
the 3
m absorption feature, a diagnostic for hydrated
minerals. Birlan et al. (2006) also observed the 3
m band in
the Lutetia spectrum, and they found a 2.9 vs. 3.2
m ratio
value close to that of the CV-CO meteorites. Furthermore, Lazzarin
et al. (2004) and Prokof'eva et al. (2005) obtained several
visible specta and detected the possible presence of features at 0.44 and 0.67
m, attributed to hydrated silicates.
Figure 5 shows the emissivity spectrum of Steins obtained
with Spitzer as mean of all the 14 individual spectra. Although
its signal is not precise enough to clearly distinguish the exact
position of the different bands, the general behaviour of the
spectrum and, in particular, the wavelength position of the
Christiansen, Reststrahlen, and Transparency features, suggests a
similarity to the aubrite (enstatite achondrite) meteorite and the
enstatite mineral, a single-chain pyroxene of which the aubrite
meteorites are primarily composed. In fact, as noted by Salisbury
et al. (1991a), the aubrite spectrum exhibits the Christiansen
peak at short wavelengths, around 8.3 m, and strong
Reststrahlen bands between 8.5 and 9.5
m. Transparency
features are evident around 12-13
m. As a comparison,
Fig. 5 also shows the emissivity spectrum of a sample of
enstatite analysed and published by Barucci et al. (2002) and of
the aubrite meteorite ALH84007 as taken from the ASTER library.
The behaviour of our Spitzer mid-infrared spectrum and the match
with laboratory spectra of the enstatite mineral and the aubrite
meteorite support the classification of Steins given by Barucci et al. (2005) as an E-type asteroid with an enstatite composition.
This classification is also strengthened by the polarimetric
properties (Fornasier et al. 2006).
![]() |
Figure 3:
The emissivity of Lutetia (average of the 14 individual
spectra) compared with the emissivity of the Allende meteorite
(from the ASTER database, with particle size 0-75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The emissivity of Lutetia (average of the 14 individual
spectra) compared with the emissivity of the Ornans meteorite by
Barucci et al. (2005) at different grain dimensions (0-20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The emissivity of Steins (average of the 14 individual
spectra) compared with the emissivity of the aubrite meteorite
ALH84007 taken from the ASTER database and that of the enstatite
sample (with particle size 0-50 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The Steins emissivity spectrum, even though it has low signal precision, is similar to the enstatite achondrite meteorites and to the enstatite mineral, confirming the rare E-type classification already suggested on the basis of ground-based spectral and polarimetric observations.
For 21 Lutetia, the emissivity spectrum departs significantly from
the typical metallic meteorites, so that the first M classification derived from its high IRAS albedo is not confirmed.
On the other hand, its emissivity in the 6-38 m range is
similar to that of the CO3 and CV3 carbonaceous chondrites with a
small grain size. Even though it is difficult to distinguish
between the CO and CV spectra, the emissivity of the Lutetia
spectrum seems more similar to that of Ornans with a smaller grain
size (0-20
m), shown by the better correspondence of the
Christiansen peak and the Restrahlen and Transparency features.
The CO carbonaceous chondrites consist of small chondrules and
aggregates set in a fine-grained matrix consisting of a
heterogeneous mixture of fine-grained, iron-rich olivine and
hydrated silicates (Sandford 1984). This similarity with the
carbonaceous chondrites implies that Lutetia is a primordial body.
Its surface has to be composed of particles of small size, with
the possible presence of aqueous altered material that underwent
slight thermal alteration.
The behaviour of the obtained emissivity data, in particular the broad analysed features are independent of albedo determination.
The albedo values of
(Lamy et al. 2007b) derived
from the Spitzer data analysis using an HV=7.3, is too high
with respect to the average albedo value of CO carbonaceous
chondrite albedo. The Lutetia albedo still remains a puzzle point,
as discussed by Carvano et al. (2007). Some high albedo particle
inclusions that do not influence the spectral reflectivity
behaviour could be the origin of the discrepancy in the albedo
values.
In the case of Steins, the obtained albedo of
(Lamy
et al. 2007a) agrees with the typical values of E-type asteroids.
The incertitude on the G parameter value (
), due to
poor sampling of the phase curve at small phase angles, and the
consequent estimation of the absolute magnitude
(Jorda et al. 2007), could be the cause of
the small variation in the albedo determination.
Acknowledgements
This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.