A&A 472, 835-846 (2007)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077474

Triggered star formation on the borders of the Galactic H II region RCW 120[*],[*]

A. Zavagno1 - M. Pomarès1 - L. Deharveng1 - T. Hosokawa2 - D. Russeil1 - J. Caplan1


1 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, 2 place Le Verrier, 13248 Marseille Cedex 4, France
2 - Division of Theoretical Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan

Received 14 March 2007 / Accepted 21 May 2007

Abstract
Context. To investigate the process of star formation triggered by the expansion of an H II region, we present a multi-wavelength analysis of the Galactic H II region RCW 120 and its surroundings. The collect and collapse model predicts that the layer of gas and dust accumulated between the ionization and shock fronts during the expansion of the H II region collapses and forms dense fragments, giving rise to potential sites of massive-star formation.
Aims. The aim of our study is to look for such massive fragments and massive young stars on the borders of RCW 120.
Methods. We mapped the RCW 120 region in the cold dust continuum emission at 1.2 mm to search for these fragments. We supplemented this study with the available near- (2MASS) and mid-IR (GLIMPSE) data to locate the IR sources observed towards this region and to analyse their properties. We then compared the observational results with the predictions of Hosokawa & Inutsuka's model (2005, ApJ, 623, 917; 2006, ApJ, 646, 240).
Results. At 1.2 mm we detected eight fragments towards this region, five located on its borders. The largest fragment has a mass of about 370 $M_{\odot}$. Class I and Class II young stellar objects are detected all over the region, with some observed far from the ionization front. This result emphasises the possible importance of distant interactions between the radiation, escaping from the ionized region, and the surrounding medium.

Key words: stars: formation - stars: early-type - ISM: H II regions - ISM: individual objects: RCW 120

   
1 Introduction

The impact of massive stars on their environments can be either destructive or constructive (Gorti & Hollenbach 2002; Tan & McKee 2001). If constructive, a massive star will favour subsequent star formation via energetic phenomena such as winds and radiation, leading to a local increase in pressure. Indeed, many physical processes can trigger star formation (see Elmegreen 1998, for a review). The collect and collapse process is one of them. In this process (first proposed by Elmegreen & Lada 1977), the expansion of an H II region generates the formation of a layer of gas and dust that is accumulated between the ionization front (IF) and the shock front (SF) that precedes the IF on the neutral side. This compressed layer may become gravitationally unstable along its surface and then fragment. This process is interesting as it allows the formation of massive fragments out of a previously uniform medium, thus permitting the formation of massive objects, whether stars or clusters.

We have shown that the collect and collapse process has triggered massive-star formation in Sh 104 (Deharveng et al. 2003) and RCW 79 (Zavagno et al. 2006); however, many questions remain. In particular, the theoretical predictions are sometimes difficult to match with the observations, since the "real'' physical environment (inhomogeneous medium, evidence of champagne flow in some H II regions, turbulence) is more complicated than described in the models. Is the collect and collapse process an efficient way of forming massive stars? How does star formation proceed in the condensations formed via this process? Up to what distance can a massive star have an impact on its surrounding?

We are engaged in a systematic study of a sample of H II regions selected on the basis of their simple morphology and their potential for being collect and collapse regions (see Deharveng et al. 2005, for details). These are choice locations for studying the onset of massive-star formation in detail, and RCW 120 is one of these regions.

In the present paper we examine the distribution of the cold dust associated with RCW 120, determine the nature of the IR sources observed towards it, and discuss the star formation processes possibly at work in this region. Section 2 gives the distance, identifies the exciting star and describes the morphology of RCW 120. Section 3 presents new 1.2-mm continuum observations giving an emission map over a $20\hbox{$^\prime$ }\times 20\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ area. Information derived from the 1.2-mm continuum emission (the cold dust distribution and the mass of the observed fragments), along with the properties of the YSOs observed in the direction of RCW 120, are given in Sect. 4. The properties of YSOs are discussed using the complete set of data available from the large-scale IR surveys GLIMPSE (Benjamin et al. 2003), 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006), and MSX (Egan et al. 1999). Section 5 presents a discussion of the geometry of RCW 120, the various star-forming processes identified towards this region, and a comparison with the theoretical model of H II region evolution of Hosokawa & Inutsuka (2005). Conclusions are given in Sect. 6.

   
2 Presentation of RCW 120

The H II region RCW 120 (Rodgers et al. 1960 - also Sh2-3, Sharpless 1959) lies in a direction close to the Galactic centre, slightly above the Galactic plane, at $l=348\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }249$, $b=0\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }469$. RCW 120 is an optical H II region, of about $7\hbox{$^\prime$ }~(E-W) \times10\hbox{$^\prime$ }\ (N-S)$ in size, located at 1.3 kpc (Russeil 2003 and Sect. 2.1). It is excited by an O8V star, LSS 3959, or CD-38 $\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }$11636 ( $\alpha_{2000} =17 ^{\rm h} 12^{\rm m} 20.6^{\rm s}$, $\delta_{2000}=-38\hbox{$^\circ$ }29\hbox{$^\prime$ }26\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$), identified spectroscopically by Georgelin & Georgelin (1970). This star is visible in Fig. 1, taken from the DSS2-red survey, showing the H$\alpha $ emission.


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{7474fig1.eps} \end{figure} Figure 1: H$\alpha $ emission of RCW 120 taken from the DSS2-red survey. The main exciting star, CD-38 $\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }$11636, is identified.
Open with DEXTER

   
2.1 Distance and exciting star

The molecular material associated with RCW 120 has a radial velocity $V_{\rm LSR}$(CO) of -8.7 km s-1 (Blitz et al. 1982). Using the Galactic rotation curve of Brand & Blitz (1993) we derive a kinematic distance of 1.35 kpc.

The main exciting star of RCW 120 has been observed at various wavelengths. Its magnitudes are B=11.93, V=10.79 (Avedisova & Kondratenko 1984), J=8.013, H=7.708, and K=7.523(2MASS Point Sources Catalog [PSC]). Using the new calibrations of Martins & Plez (2006), and the spectral type O8V, we estimate a visual extinction $A_{\rm V}$ of 4.36 mag and a distance of 1.33 kpc. This photometric distance agrees with the kinematic distance. We adopt a distance of 1.34 kpc in the following.

RCW 120 is a thermal radio-continuum source. Its flux density has been measured at various wavelengths, and is in the range 5.5-8.5 Jy (Manchester 1969; Altenhoff et al. 1970; Reifenstein et al. 1970; Griffith et al. 1994; Langston et al. 2000). Adopting a flux density of $7.0\pm1.5$ Jy, a distance of 1.34 kpc, and using Simpson & Rubin's Eq. (1) (1990), we derive the ionizing photon flux, $\log~(N_{\rm { Lyc}})=48.04\pm0.10$. According to thecalibration of Martins et al. (2005), this corresponds to a star of spectral type O8.5V-O9V. This is somewhat later than the O8V spectral type estimated directly from spectroscopy (Georgelin & Georgelin 1970). But this is not surprising as ionizing photons are very probably absorbed by dust grains inside this H II region; indeed, the emission of these grains is observed at 21.3 $\mu $m (MSX Band E) clearly in the direction of the ionized gas (see Fig. 1 of Deharveng et al. 2005).

RCW 120 is notable for its high degree of symmetry. On the one hand, the ionization front, traced by the 8 $\mu $m emission, is almost circular. On the other, the whole region presents a nearly north-south symmetry axis, with the exciting star lying on this axis.

Several facts indicate that a nearly north-south density gradient is present in the region, with density increasing towards the south: i) the zones of brightest H$\alpha $ emission are observed in the southern part of the H II region (see Figs. 1 and 2); ii) the exciting star lies in the southern part of the H II region; and iii) the ionized gas is beginning to break out of the H II region, northwards. We come back to this point in the next section and in Sect. 4.4.

2.2 Morphology of RCW 120


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[angle=0,width=12cm,clip]{7474fig2.eps} \end{figure} Figure 2: Spitzer-IRAC 4.5 $\mu $m (green) and 8 $\mu $m (red) images from the GLIMPSE survey superimposed on a SuperCOSMOS H$\alpha $ image (turquoise) of RCW 120. The 8 $\mu $m emission is dominated by the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules. Note the presence of a PAH layer, corresponding to the hot photodissociation region that surrounds the ionized region. The field size is 24$^\prime $  (E-W) $\times $ 27$^\prime $  (N-S). North is up and east is left.
Open with DEXTER

RCW 120 is associated with a large amount of dust. Figure 2 is a composite colour image showing the H$\alpha $ emission (taken from the Super-COSMOS survey, Parker et al. 2005) and the 4.5 $\mu $m and 8 $\mu $m emission (from the Spitzer-GLIMPSE survey, http://www.astro.wisc.edu/sirtf/). The 8 $\mu $m IRAC band contains emission bands centred at 7.6, 7.8, and 8.6 $\mu $m, commonly attributed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules and a continuum contribution from very small grains. PAHs are believed to be destroyed in the ionized gas, but larger molecules can survive (Verstraete et al. 1996; Peeters et al. 2005). PAHs are excited by UV photons ( $h\nu < 13.6$ eV) (Sellgren 1984) in the photo-dissociation region (PDR). PAH emission is a good tracer of the hot PDR that surrounds the H II region. Figure 2 shows that PAH emission completely surrounds the ionized gas. Filaments extend far from the ionization front, suggesting the idea of a "leaky'' H II region, probably due to small-scale inhomogeneities in the ionization front and in the surrounding medium. This point is important, as it could explain how triggered star formation may occur far from the ionization front (see Sect. 5.2). Figure 3 (left) is a mosaic $K_{\rm S}$ image of RCW 120 from the 2MASS survey. This clearly shows the presence of an absorbing region surrounding RCW 120, with some filamentary structures that extend far from the ionized region. The clear limits of the absorbing zone and its large width (especially to the north) suggest that we are seeing the remaining part of the parental molecular cloud. The right part of Fig. 3 shows, on the same scale, an image of the RCW 120 region, taken from the Spitzer-GLIMPSE survey in the band centred at 8 $\mu $m. The absorption zones, clearly visible at 2 $\mu $m, are still observed at 8 $\mu $m (especially to the north), indicating the presence of high-density material in those regions. Lacking velocity information, we cannot prove the direct association of the absorbing zones with the ionized region. The high contrast seen at 2 $\mu $m (Fig. 3, left), between the absorbing zones that closely surround RCW 120 and the surrounding medium observed at a larger distance, indicates that the association may be real. The black box shown in Fig. 3 on the 8 $\mu $m GLIMPSE image shows the zone that we have selected to search for YSOs using colour criteria in the near and mid IR. This part is described in Sect. 4.2.
  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[angle=0,width=17.6cm,clip]{7474fig3.eps} \end{figure} Figure 3: Dust associated with RCW 120. Left: $K_{\rm S}$ (2.17 $\mu $m) mosaic image of the RCW 120 region from the 2MASS survey. Zones of high absorption surround the ionized region. Absorption filaments extend far away from the ionization front, revealing a non-homogenous medium. Right: PAH emission at 8 $\mu $m from Spitzer-GLIMPSE. Absorption features are still seen at this wavelength, indicating the presence of dense material. The black box represents the region that has been searched for young stellar objects
Open with DEXTER

   
3 Observations

Of the two sets of observations, the SEST-SIMBA contains continuum maps at 1.2-mm (250 GHz) of a $20\hbox{$^\prime$ }~\times ~20\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ field centred on RCW 120 were obtained using the 37-channel SIMBA bolometer array (SEST Imaging Bolometer Array) on May 7-8, 2003. The beam size is 24 $^{\prime\prime}$. The positional uncertainty of the SIMBA observations is less than 3 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$. Six individual maps covering the whole region were obtained with the fast scanning speed (80 $^{\prime\prime}$ per second). The total integration time was 10 h. The final map was constructed as described in Zavagno et al. (2006). The residual noise in the final map is about 20 mJy/beam (1$\sigma $). We then used the emission above 5$\sigma $(100 mJy/beam level) to delineate the 1.2-mm condensations.

The H$\alpha $ Fabry-Perot observations of RCW 120 were obtained with CIGALE on a 36-cm telescope (La Silla, ESO). CIGALE uses a Fabry-Perot interferometer scanning the H$\alpha $ profile to give the kinematics over the field. The field of view is 39 $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$ square with a pixel size of 9 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$. The Fabry-Perot interferometer has an interference order of 2604 at H$\alpha $, i.e. a free spectral range of 115 km s-1. The finesse is 10 (FWHM 11.5 km s-1) and the sampling step is 5 km s-1. The velocity and FWHM uncertainties are both $\sim$1 km s-1. A complete description of the instrument, including data acquisition and reduction techniques, can be found in Le Coarer et al. (1992).

The H$\alpha $ profiles need to be decomposed into two components: the night-sky lines (geocoronal H$\alpha $ and OH) and the nebular lines. The night-sky lines are modelled by the instrumental profile, while the nebular lines are modelled by Gaussians convolved with that profile. In order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio we extracted and analysed profiles from large areas ( $45\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }\times 45\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$). The profile analysis shows that the LSR radial velocity of the ionized gas of RCW 120 ranges from -8 km s-1 to -15 km s-1.

4 Results


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[angle=0,width=16.5cm,clip]{7474fig4.eps} \end{figure} Figure 4: Left: millimetre continuum emission contours superimposed on a SuperCOSMOS H$\alpha $ image of the region. Contours range from 60 (3$\sigma $) to 960 mJy/beam in steps of 100 mJy/beam and from 1000 to 3000 mJy/beam in steps of 400 mJy/beam. Right: millimetre continuum emission contours superimposed on the GLIMPSE 5.8 $\mu $m image of the region. Contours range from 100 mJy/beam (5$\sigma $) to 400 in steps of 100 mJy/beam and then from 500 to 3000 in steps of 250 mJy/beam. Condensations at 1.2 mm are identified in Table 1.
Open with DEXTER

Figure 4 (left) shows the 1.2-mm continuum emission contours superimposed on a SuperCOSMOS H$\alpha $ image of RCW 120. Eight condensations are observed at a 5$\sigma $ level. Five of these (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) are immediately adjacent to the ionized region. This location suggests that these condensations may result from the fragmentation of a layer of collected material accumulated between the ionization front and the shock front, as predicted by the collect and collapse model. The two most massive condensations (Nos. 1 and 2) are observed to the south. Condensations 5, 6, and 8 are observed farther away from the ionization front but coincide with regions of high extinction in Fig. 3. Note that only low extinction is detected in the optical and 8 $\mu $m images in the direction of the most massive condensations (1 and 2), indicating that most of the absorbing material must be located behind the emitting region.

Figure 4 (right) presents the 1.2-mm continuum emission contours superimposed on the 5.8 $\mu $m GLIMPSE image of RCW 120. The lowest contour delineates the condensations' surfaces as defined, for the mass estimates, at the 5$\sigma $ level (100 mJy/beam, Sect. 3).

  
4.1 Mass estimates

The millimetre continuum emission from the condensations identified in Fig. 4 (right) is mainly due to optically thin thermal dust emission. We used the formula given by Hildebrand (1983) and proceeded as explained in Zavagno et al. (2006). Table 1 lists the measured and derived properties obtained for the millimetre fragments identified in Fig. 4. Column 1 gives the fragment numbers, Cols. 2 and 3 give the emission peak coordinates, Col. 4 gives the 1.2-mm integrated flux, and Col. 5 the range of derived masses for the corresponding fragment depending on the adopted temperature (20 or 30 K). The lower mass values correspond to the higher dust temperature. Because of possible molecular line contamination (overestimation of the continuum flux) and the possible presence of an internal source of heating (a higher dust temperature than expected), the fragments' mass estimate is an upper limit (see also Beuther et al. 2002). If an outflow is present, the molecular line contamination to the measured 1.2-mm flux may be as much as 30% (Gueth et al. 2003) but is probably about 10% if no outflow is present (Guilloteau, private communication). The two most massive fragments, Nos. 1 and 2, are located to the south, probably a consequence of the higher density in this area. The other fragments, located on the borders of the ionized region or even farther away, are less massive. Fragment 1 shows some structure, in particular a highly peaked emission. The 1.2-mm emission peak of 3.08 Jy/beam indicates an H2 column density greater than $3.5 \times 10^{23}$ cm-2 for a temperature of 20 K, corresponding to a visual extinction $A_V\geq 200$ mag. This fragment is a potential site of high-mass star formation (see also Beuther et al. 2002). However, as discussed in Sect. 4.2, no 8 $\mu $m source is observed towards this emission peak. This could be due to the low sensitivity of the GLIMPSE survey. A source should be sought at longer wavelengths.

Table 1: Mass estimates for the millimetre fragments.

   
4.2 Search for young stellar objects using 2MASS and GLIMPSE data

Our purpose is to look for star formation towards RCW 120. For this we use the Spitzer-GLIMPSE survey to do a systematic search for YSOs using colour selection criteria. Indeed, YSOs are expected to have specific colours depending on mass and evolutionary status (see Allen et al. 2004). We have selected the absorbing zone, centred on RCW 120, seen in the near IR (Fig. 3), from $\alpha_{2000}$ from 17 $^{\rm h}11^{\rm m} 11 \hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$ }05$ to $17^{\rm h} 13^{\rm m} 17\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$ }54$ and from $\delta_{2000}$ from -38 $\hbox{$^\circ$ }14\hbox{$^\prime$ }30\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$ }$40 to  $-38\hbox{$^\circ$ }40\hbox{$^\prime$ }40\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$.

We extracted the 35 178 objects in this zone from the GLIMPSE PSC (http://www.astro.wisc.edu/sirtf/). Then, to avoid sources near the detection limit, we selected the 2654 sources that had been measured in the four IRAC bands and were brighter than 11 mag in the 8 $\mu $m band. From these we selected those objects with colours corresponding to Class II and Class I, i.e. $[3.6]{-}[4.5]
\geq 0.4$ and $[5.8]{-}[8.0] \geq 0.4$ (Allen et al. 2004). The final selection is listed in Table 2 to which we have added the exciting star of RCW 120 and a few giants.

Table 2, available at the CDS, gives the position and photometry from 1.25 $\mu $m to 8 $\mu $m of the detected YSOs, sorted by location (towards the millimetre condensations, towards and outside from the H II region). Column 1 gives their identification numbers. Columns 2 and 3 give their coordinates according to the GLIMPSE PSC. Columns 4 to 6 give their J, H, and $K_{\rm S}$ magnitudes from the 2MASS PSC (http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/software/catalogs/tmpsc.html). Columns 7 to 10 give their [3.6], [4.5], [5.8], and [8.0] mag from the GLIMPSE PSC. When not available from the PSC, we measured the magnitudes (aperture photometry) using the Basic Calibrated Data frames; these are indicated with asterisks in Table 2. Column 11 gives general comments about the nature of each source (Class I, Class II, giant).

4.3 Properties of the observed sources

Several tools can be used to determine the nature of the sources, using their IR magnitudes from the 2MASS, Spitzer-GLIMPSE, and MSX surveys.
  \begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{7474fig5.eps} \end{figure} Figure 5: Spatial distribution of the YSOs detected towards RCW 120. The red circles are Class I sources, the green triangles Class II sources. In both cases, the largest symbols are for the brightest sources, with $[8.0]\leq 6$ mag. Bright Class I sources observed far from the ionization front are identified (see Sect. 5.2). The field size is 25$^\prime $  $(E-W) \times 25\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }5~(N-S)$.
Open with DEXTER

Figure 5 shows the spatial distribution of the Class I and Class II YSOs identified in the direction of RCW 120 and shows that these YSOs are located in three main zones: i) near the cold dust condensations identified in Fig. 4; ii) in the direction of the ionized region; and iii) far from the ionization front and, in some cases, not associated with a detected millimetre condensation. The lack of velocity information makes it impossible to firmly associate the detected YSOs with RCW 120. However, the statistical analysis presented in Sect. 5.2 suggests that most of these objects are associated with this region. The GLIMPSE colour-colour diagram is shown in Fig. 6. The sources discussed in the text are identified by the labels given in Table 2. A large number of objects are Class I sources. We do not consider those sources located in the lower part of the Class II box, since main sequence and giant stars (located in the elliptical region centred on 0, 0 in this [3.6]-[4.5] versus [5.8]-[8.0] diagram) may be falsely displaced into this zone if they are faint and superimposed on background emission (the colours of the extended emission are [3.6]-[4.5]=0.1 and [5.8]-[8.0]=1.9). Giant stars can be bright IR sources. We used the 2MASS J-H versus H-K diagram, not presented here, to identify such stars.


  \begin{figure}
\includegraphics[origin=rb,angle=270,width=12cm,clip]{7474fig6.eps} \end{figure} Figure 6: GLIMPSE colour-colour diagram, [3.6]-[4.5] versus [5.8]-[8.0], for the sources observed towards RCW 120. Class I and Class II zones are indicated according to criteria given by Allen et al. (2004). The black arrow is the reddening vector for a visual extinction of 40 mag. The ellipse centred on 0, 0 encloses the region of main sequence and giant stars. The black star represents the exciting star of RCW 120.
Open with DEXTER

Note that the colour-colour diagrams do not give information about the sources' brightnesses and that additional information is needed to better discuss the nature of the sources. We do not discuss the spectral energy distribution (SED) in this paper, because the 2MASS data for the embedded sources are often missing (or are given as lower limits) and also because the wavelength coverage of GLIMPSE is too limited to accurately fit the SEDs, especially since GLIMPSE sees only part of the deep silicate absorption that is often present in YSOs. Longer wavelength data are needed to use the SED as a reliable tool for evolutionary and brightness classifications.

Below we give information about some specific properties of the sources, due either to their locations and/or evolutionary stages. Sources observed towards millimetre condensations may be affected by local extinction. Apparently, Class I sources may in fact be reddened Class II. This is particularly critical for deeply embedded sources classified as Class I with no 2MASS counterparts.

Condensation 1
Figure 7 is a composite colour image of condensation 1. Source 12C1, the brightest object at 8 $\mu $m near condensation 1, is located in the transition region between Class I and Class II sources (Fig. 6). This source is not directly associated with 1.2-mm emission but is observed towards a filamentary structure observed in absorption at 8 $\mu $m (see Fig. 3); it is far (about 1.2 pc) from the ionization front but is observed surrounded by diffuse 8 $\mu $m emission, indicating that far UV photons leaking from the ionized region have reached this zone. This radiation may have influenced the formation of this young source. We discuss this point in Sect. 5.2.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7474fig7CMJN.eps} \end{figure} Figure 7: Top: colour composite image of condensation 1, showing the K image (blue) from 2MASS, and the 3.6 $\mu $m (green) and 8 $\mu $m (red) image from the GLIMPSE survey. Bottom: The sources discussed in the text are identified on the 5.8 $\mu $m GLIMPSE image.
Open with DEXTER

Source 16C1, a Class I object, is the brightest source observed towards condensation 1, and it has no 2MASS counterpart. This source coincides with an extension of the 1.2-mm continuum emission and is observed at the head of a finger-shaped absorbing region observed at 8 $\mu $m. Faint 8 $\mu $m emission surrounds this region, indicating that UV photons reach this zone. The location of this source at the vertex of an absorbing structure indicates that globule squeezing may have occurred here, triggering star formation.

Source 13C1 is also a Class I object having no 2MASS counterpart. It is observed in the direction of a 1.2-mm emission extension.

The sources 4C1, 5C1, 6C1, 7C1, 8C1, and 21C1 are observed towards the main 1.2-mm emission peak. Most of these are low-luminosity Class I objects. This strong emission peak does not coincide with an absorbing zone at 8 $\mu $m, so the condensation must be located behind the 8 $\mu $m emitting region. The nature of source 21C1, observed exactly coincident with the 1.2-mm peak, is unclear, as this source has no measured magnitudes in the [3.6], [5.8], and [8.0] bands.

Condensation 4
Figure 8 shows a detailed view of condensation 4. As seen in Fig. 8, two bright extended sources called objects 1 and 2 and not given in the GLIMPSE PSC (probably due to their extended nature), dominate the 8 $\mu $m emission. At their centres lie near-IR stellar objects. Objects 1 and 2 are also seen in the MSX images and are classified from their MSX colours as Herbig Ae/Be objects (for object 1, see source 19 in Deharveng et al. 2005). We have verified from its MSX colours that object 2 (not included in Deharveng et al. 2005) is a Herbig Ae/Be object as well. The extended nebulae are probably local PDRs created by the radiation of the central sources. These are not massive enough to form H II regions but they can, with lower energy photons, heat the surrounding dust, thus creating local PDRs.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7474fig8CMJN.eps} \end{figure} Figure 8: Top: same as Fig. 7, but for condensation 4. The sources discussed in the text are identified in the 8 $\mu $m GLIMPSE image ( bottom).
Open with DEXTER

Class I sources including Nos. 2, 3, and 4C4, are observed in the immediate surroundings, in addition to these two Herbig Ae/Be stars. No source is detected towards the peak of the 1.2-mm condensation. Note that the shape of the ionization front is distorted in the direction of condensation 4. We discuss this point in Sect. 5.2.

Condensation 5
Condensation 5 is observed far from the ionization front and coincides with a region of high extinction observed at both 2 $\mu $m and 8 $\mu $m (Fig. 3). An interesting point is the presence of numerous radial structures seen in absorption at 8 $\mu $m, perpendicular to the IF (Fig. 3). This suggests that radiation passes through this rather dense medium, with enough energy to shape it, and may have favoured subsequent star formation within this possible pre-existing condensation.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7474fig9.eps} \end{figure} Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7 but for condensation 6. The sources discussed in the text are identified in the 5.8 $\mu $m GLIMPSE image ( bottom).
Open with DEXTER

Two Class I sources, 1C5 and 2C5, are observed towards condensation 5. The bright source 1C5 is observed towards the condensation's centres.

Condensation 6
Figure 9 shows condensation 6 in detail. This object, like condensations 5 and 8, is observed far from the ionization front (about 1.5 pc away) and coincides with an absorption region seen in the 2 $\mu $m and 8 $\mu $m images (Fig. 3). Five sources are observed towards condensation 6, source 5C6 being the brightest. Source 3C6 is a very faint red object observed towards the peak of the 1.2-mm emission (Fig. 9). Objects 2C6 and 4C6, also classified as Class I, are located farther from the centre of the 1.2-mm emission peak.

Sources observed towards the ionized region
As seen in Table 2 and in Fig. 5, all of the sources observed towards the ionized region are Class II objects, apart from one Class I source, 13H II. The ionizing star of RCW 120 is identified in Fig. 1. Its GLIMPSE colours correspond to those of main sequence stars (Fig. 6).

A Class I source (5H II) and a Class II source (1H II) are observed towards the ionized region, lying on the vertices of triangular structures. Both (the sources and the structures) are seen in emission at 8 $\mu $m (see Fig. 12) and are discussed in Sect. 5.1.

   
4.4 H$\alpha $ velocity field


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7474fig10.eps} \end{figure} Figure 10: Top: H$\alpha $ velocity field (grey scale plus black dashed contours). Bottom: H$\alpha $ line width (grey scale). The H$\alpha $ emission is superimposed as white contours.
Open with DEXTER

Figure 10 presents the velocity field of the ionized gas observed towards RCW 120 and the width of the H$\alpha $ emission line over the field. The uncertainty of the H$\alpha $ line width is 1 km s-1. The velocity field displays a gradient, from about -9 km s-1 to the south of the H II region, up to -16 km s-1to the north of the region. In Fig. 2 RCW 120 looks like a bottle full of ionized gas, its "neck'' turned to the north where a clear opening in the 8 $\mu $m indicates a break in the ionization front and the surrounding dust layer. The H$\alpha $ velocity field shows that the ionized gas flows towards the observer. This result is consistent with the most massive condensation being located to the south where dense material has accumulated. The northern part is probably less dense, allowing the ionized gas to break the surrounding shell and flow away. We are probably observing the beginning of a "champagne'' phase (Tenorio-Tagle 1979), and the observed shape of the region is also consistent with this result.

Figure 10 shows that on the borders of the ionized region the H$\alpha $ line width is narrow - around 18 km s-1 - when compared to the central parts where the width is $\simeq$24 km s-1. This is expected for an expanding H II region: whereas the expansion velocity has no radial component on the borders of this region (thus the line is narrow), the expansion velocity is purely radial in the direction of the centre and we see both the approaching and receding sides (thus broadening the line). We expected this to be confirmed by the H I emission but it was not, as described below.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7474fig11} \end{figure} Figure 11:I emission (in white) from the SGPS integrated between -15.66 km s-1 and -10.72 km s-1. H$\alpha $ emission is superimposed as green contours.
Open with DEXTER

The H I emission from the Southern Galactic Plane Survey (SGPS, McClure-Griffiths et al. 2005) is shown in Fig. 11, integrated between -10.72 km s-1 and -15.66 km s-1. The angular resolution of these observations is 40 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ and the velocity resolution is 0.82 km s-1. The emission shows an annular structure. The H II region and condensations 1 and 2 lie in the direction of the central hole. The annular structure is larger near -11 km s-1 (the systemic velocity) than near -15 km s-1, so the whole structure appears to be in expansion. However, we only see the approaching side of the cloud, as no emission is observed around -5 km s-1, as would be expected from the receding side of the cloud. We have no explanation for this fact.

5 Discussion

  
5.1 Star-forming processes at work in RCW 120

Several star-forming processes may be at work in the direction of RCW 120.
$\bullet$
The collect and collapse process: we observe a collected layer of cold dust revealed by the 1.2-mm continuum emission. We also observe fragments along this layer, suggesting that the collected material has already experienced fragmentation. Fragments 1, 2, and 3 are clearly separated along this layer and the ionized gas seems to be leaking between them (see Fig. 12 top). However, no massive star formation has been observed in the direction of these fragments, contrary to what is observed on the borders of Sh 104 and RCW 79. Note that the non-detection of an IR source at the peak of the 1.2-mm emission could be due to the high extinction we derive near this peak and to the low sensitivity of the GLIMPSE observations. Deeper IR observations are needed to possibly establish the presence of an IR star forming in this condensation. The high-density peak observed in condensation 1 is probably the best place to search for massive YSOs.

$\bullet$
The radiation-driven implosions of pre-existing clumps: this is possibly the case for star formation associated with condensation 4. The shape of the ionization front surrounding this condensation is clearly distorted, protruding inside the H II region. This situation is to be expected if the expanding ionization front encounters a motionless dense clump. In this case star formation may result from the radiation-driven implosion of the clump (Lefloch & Lazareff 1994; Kessel-Deynet & Burkert 2003).

$\bullet$
Dynamical instabilities of the ionization front: the region located between condensations 1 and 2 is probably dynamically unstable. Figure 12 shows that the ionization front is locally distorted, with the ionized gas leaking between the condensations. We also observe two triangular structures protruding into the ionized zone. Two YSOs, sources 1H II and 5H II, are observed at the vertices of these triangular structures (see Fig. 12, bottom). Such structures were possibly formed by the development of instabilities in the ionization front, as simulated by García-Segura & Franco (1996) and by Dale et al. (in preparation). The latter simulation shows the formation of stars at the vertices of such structures.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.6cm,clip]{7474fig12.eps} \end{figure} Figure 12: Instabilities of the ionization front. Top: the ionized gas traced by the H$\alpha $ emission (in blue) leaks between condensations 1 and 2, at the locations shown by the blue arrows. Bottom: structure of the ionization front (GLIMPSE 5.8 $\mu $m image). The black arrows point to two YSOs (1H II and 5H II) observed at the vertices of triangular structures possibly created by dynamical instabilities in the ionization front.
Open with DEXTER

   
5.2 Star formation observed far from the ionization front

Figure 5 presents the spatial distribution of the Class I and Class II YSOs identified towards RCW 120. It shows that many of these sources lie far from the ionization front - as far as 1.5 pc. Some examples are the bright Class I sources 6out, 9out, 11out, 13out, 19out, 26out, 1C5, 5C6, and 12C1. The radial structures clearly visible in absorption on the northeastern and southwestern sides of the region (see Fig. 3, right) are striking evidence of interaction between the radiation leaking from the IF and the surrounding medium.

In the absence of velocity information, it is impossible to be sure that the observed YSOs are all associated with RCW 120. Only a statistical approach can give us some insight into this point. We have considered two zones located at the same Galactic latitude as RCW 120 ( $b=0\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }499$) and on either side of it (at Galactic longitudes $l=347\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }16$ and $l=349\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }16$). Each of these zones has the same area as the region we searched for YSOs around RCW 120 (Sect. 4.2). The same selection criteria was applied to search for Class I and Class II sources in these zones as in RCW 120 (i.e. [3.6]-[4.5] and $[5.8]{-}[8.0] \geq 0.4$ mag). The result is as follows: 15 and 25 YSOs, respectively, are detected in these zones compared to 107 YSOs in the RCW 120 zone. This suggests that most of the YSOs detected towards RCW 120 are probably associated with it.

Which process can trigger star formation far from the ionization front? Figure 3 shows that low-brightness PAH emission features also extend far from the ionization front. It seems that the hot photon-dominated region, where PAH emission originates, is more extended than would be expected if the ionization front were impermeable. Examination of a wide-field H$\alpha $ image also clearly shows extended H$\alpha $ emission surrounding the RCW 120 region. This suggests a leaky H II region bounded by a porous ionization front, allowing a fraction of the UV radiation to reach regions far away from the front.


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{7474fig13.eps} \end{figure} Figure 13: Unsharp-masked image of the southern part of RCW 120 at 8 $\mu $m (see text for details).
Open with DEXTER

Figure 13 is an unsharp-masked image of the southern part of RCW 120 at 8 $\mu $m, obtained by subtracting a median-filtered version of the same image produced with a $12\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }\times
12\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ window from the original GLIMPSE image. The extended bright structures are thus removed, leaving the low-brightness, small-scale structures. The left part of Fig. 13 shows the highly irregular aspect of the IF. The right side, where the contrast has been enhanced, shows the outer part of the PDR, with many radial structures originating from the IF. This structure clearly indicates that the UV radiation can penetrate far inside the surrounding medium. Can the high pressure of the warm, partially ionized inter-clump medium trigger star formation far from the ionization front?

5.3 Comparison with models

The collect and collapse process of star formation, first proposed by Elmegreen & Lada (1977), has been formulated analytically by Whitworth et al. (1994; see also Dale et al. 2007) and simulated by Hosokawa & Inutsuka (2005, 2006). All these models are spherically symmetric around the exciting star and assume that the H II region expands into a uniform medium of density n0. The assumption of spherical symmetry is not too bad for RCW 120, but the observations presented here indicate that the medium is far from homogeneous. However, no model takes this fact into account.

A rough estimate of n0 can be obtained by assuming that all the material now observed, either ionized in the H II region or neutral in the massive fragments surrounding RCW 120, was previously located in a sphere of density n0 and of radius equal to that of the H II region. We used only the southern half of RCW 120 for this estimate of n0. From the radio-continuum flux density, we estimate the mass of ionized gas to be M(H II $) =54~M_{\odot}$(thus $27~M_{\odot}$ for half the H II region). The mass of neutral material in condensations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 is $633~M_{\odot}$ (the maximum value, for T=20 K). The mass of neutral material in the collected layer, but not detected in the direction of the centre of the H II region because its emission is below the sensitivity limit of the 20 mJy/beam, is $\leq$ $185~M_{\odot}$ (thus $\leq$ $93~M_{\odot}$for half the layer), hence an upper limit of 3000 atoms cm-3for n0. A lower limit of 1400 atoms cm-3 is obtained for T=30 K.

The dynamical expansion of RCW 120 and its PDR can be analysed using the model of Hosokawa & Inutsuka (2006). A one-dimensional, spherically symmetric numerical method is used. The UV and far-UV radiation transfer, as well as the thermal and chemical processes, are solved with a time-dependent hydrodynamic code. We suppose a central star of $22~M_{\odot}$ (which, according to Diaz-Miller et al. 1998, emits the same number of ionizing photons as the exciting star of RCW 120) and a uniform ambient density of 3000 atoms cm-3. Figure 14 shows the time evolution of several physical quantities. The radius of RCW 120, 1.67 pc, is reached at t=0.4 Myr. At this time the electron density of the ionized gas agrees with the observed value of 86 cm-3.

Figure 14 also shows the gas shell swept up by the shock front, with densities in the range 104-105 cm-3; the highest density is found on the outside of the shell, close to the SF. The shell mass is about $1000~M_{\odot}$ at this time, and most of the swept-up hydrogen gas remains in the shell as hydrogen molecules. Figure 15 shows the evolution of the positions of various fronts. The swept-up shell very quickly becomes mainly molecular (H2); later on, at about 0.3 Myr, the dissociation front of the CO molecule is engulfed by the expanding shell. Parts of the shell become unstable when $t \geq (G \rho )^{-1/2}$. Figure 15 shows that the unstable region appears at about 0.3 Myr, near the SF, and gradually spreads over the shell. Thus we would expect to see, at the age of 0.4 Myr, a shell of mainly molecular collected material, with the outside parts of the shell (near the SF) fragmented. Of course, the model does not tell us if stars have already formed in these fragments. Note that these estimates are rough, due to the uncertainties concerning both the density and the uniformity of the medium into which RCW 120 evolves.

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,clip]{7474fig14.eps} \end{figure} Figure 14: Snapshots of the gas dynamical evolution at t=0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 Myr.
Open with DEXTER


  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,clip]{7474fig15.eps} \end{figure} Figure 15: Top: evolution of the positions of the various fronts (ionization front [IF], shock front [SF] and dissociation front [DF] of the H2 and CO molecules). Bottom: time evolution of the column density of the H2 and CO components. The shaded region corresponds to $t \geq (G \rho )^{-1/2}$ within the shell and hence indicates that gravitational fragmentation is expected. The contours show where the fractions of molecular gas $X_{\rm H_2}$ (dashed contours) and $X_{\rm CO}$ (dot-dashed contours) = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8.
Open with DEXTER

6 Conclusions

Although it apparently has a very simple morphology, the H II region RCW 120 elicits several questions.

It appears as an almost perfect sphere full of ionized gas - a Strömgren sphere around the exciting star. The sphere is open in the direction of lower density, in the north, and the ionized gas is escaping from the sphere. We are most probably seeing the very beginning of a "champagne flow''. This is shown by the shape of the H II region, the shape of its IF as shown by the PAH emission and by the velocity field.

Dense material, now mostly molecular, has been collected around the ionized gas during the expansion of the H II region. The collected layer has begun to fragment. This is shown by the millimetre emission of the cold dust. Some fragments are massive, but no massive YSO is detected (up to 8 $\mu $m at the GLIMPSE sensitivity) in the direction of the fragments. If a massive Class 0 object is forming, it may be detectable but only at longer wavelengths at the emission peak of condensation 1.

Several Class I and Class II objects, of low and intermediate mass, are observed in the direction of the PDR, near the IF. Their formation was probably triggered by the expansion of the H II region, via various processes such as dynamical instabilities of the IF and the radiation-driven implosion of pre-existing molecular clumps.

Two other points are pending and need further observations for them to be understood:

-
What is the origin of the shell of atomic hydrogen surrounding RCW 120? We suggest that it is part of the parental molecular cloud, photo-dissociated from the outside by FUV background radiation (Hosokawa 2007). But why do we observe only half a shell of H I material (the half-shell approaching us)?

-
Several YSOs are observed far from the ionization front. Are they associated with RCW 120? We have no proof that any specific YSO is associated with RCW 120, but a statistical test suggests that most of them are associated. If this is the case, what physical process can trigger star formation far from the ionization front?
This point is very important and is probably linked to the structure of the PDR. We are most probably dealing with a leaky H II region, in the sense that the ionization front is permeable to the UV photons $(h\nu>13.6$ eV). This is shown by the presence of a low-brightness H$\alpha $ zone surrounding RCW 120, which has the same shape and almost the same extent as that of the low-brightness PAH PDR. The low-density PDR, beyond the collected layer, appears to be very irregular. If hydrogen-ionizing UV photons escape from the H II region, they ionize the low-density inter-clump medium, destroying the PAH there. The photons may carve radial tunnels. Lower energy photons heat PAHs at the surface of the high-density neutral clumps. The pressure of this partially-ionized, high-temperature, inter-clump medium may trigger star formation in the low-mass clumps.

If real, such structures and such signatures of star formation should be found around other H II regions. Long-distance triggering by radiation through a permeable medium should be investigated in more detail by models and observations, as the results may change our view of triggered versus spontaneous star formation.

Acknowledgements
This research has made use of the Simbad astronomical database operated at the CDS, Strasbourg, France, and of the interactive sky atlas Aladin (Bonnarel et al. 2000). Our long-term collaborators on this project, B. Lefloch, J. Brand and F. Massi, are warmly thanked for stimulating discussions. We thank R. Cautain for his help in creating the $K_{\rm S}$ mosaic image of RCW 120. We thank the anonymous referee for important comments that helped to clarify the text. This publication used data products from the Midcourse Space EXperiment, from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, and from the InfraRed Astronomical Satellite; for these we used the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We also used the SuperCOSMOS H$\alpha $ survey. This work is based in part on GLIMPSE data obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under NASA contract 1407.

References

 

Copyright ESO 2007