A&A 468, 617-625 (2007)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077289
M. Szymczak1 - A. Bartkiewicz1 - A. M. S. Richards2
1 - Torun Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus
University, Gagarina 11, 87-100 Torun, Poland
2 - Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester,
Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK
Received 13 February 2007 / Accepted 19 March 2007
Abstract
Aims. We characterize the molecular environment of candidate massive young stellar objects (MYSOs) signposted by methanol masers.
Methods. Single pixel observations of 10 transitions of HCO+, CO and CS isotopomers were carried out, using the IRAM 30 m telescope. We studied a sample of 28 targets for which the 6.7 GHz maser emission positions are known with a sub-arcsecond accuracy.
Results. The systemic velocity inferred from the optically thin lines agrees within 3 km s-1 with the central velocity of the maser emission for most of the sources. About 64% of the sources show line wings in one or more transitions of CO, HCO+ and CS species, indicating the presence of molecular outflows. Comparison of the widths of line wings and methanol maser emission suggests that the 6.7 GHz maser line traces the environment of MYSO of various kinematic regimes. Therefore, conditions conducive for the methanol maser can exist in the inner parts of molecular clouds or circumstellar discs as well as in the outer parts associated with molecular outflows. Calculations of the physical conditions based on the CO and HCO+ lines and the CS line intensity ratios refine the input parameters for maser models. Specifically, a gas number density of <107 cm-3 is sufficient for strong maser emission and a high methanol fractional abundance (>
)
is required.
Key words: ISM: molecules - radio lines: ISM - stars: formation - masers
Table 1: List of targets.
The non-linear nature of maser amplification means that it is difficult to relate the maser line intensity directly to the physical parameters of the active region. Theoretical models predict the formation of methanol maser lines under a rather wide range of gas and dust temperatures (30-200 K and 100-300 K, respectively) and hydrogen number densities ( 105-108 cm-3) (Cragg et al. 2002). Thus, it appears that a better understanding of the environments in which the masers arise is required in order to realise their full potential as probes of the formation of high-mass stars.
In this paper we report our attempts to constrain the range of environments probed by methanol masers using observations of thermal emission from other molecular species and lines. Specifically, the ratios of the intensities of different transitions of CS and C34S molecules are used to obtain the temperature and density of the gas. The optically thin and thick lines of CO and HCO+ are used to constrain the column density. These techniques were successfully used to characterize other samples of MYSOs (e.g. Plume et al. 1997; Beuther et al. 2002a; Purcell et al. 2006). Additionally, the molecular line profiles yield information on the kinematics of various parts of the molecular clouds surrounding the high-mass protostars (e.g. Fuller et al. 2005; Purcell et al. 2006).
A homogeneous and unbiased sample of MYSOs is necessary in order to address these issues properly. Our recent 6.7-GHz unbiased survey for methanol masers in selected regions of the Galactic plane (Szymczak et al. 2002) provides such a complete, sensitivity limited sample of candidate MYSOs. Objects identified in the survey probably represent a class of MYSOs in an early evolutionary phase. Some groups and individual sources in this class, selected using various diagnostics of high-mass star formation, have been studied in thermal molecular lines (Brand et al. 2001; Beuther et al. 2002a; Fuller et al. 2005), but this is the first published study of a homogeneous sample based solely on the presence of detectable methanol masers.
The 28 sources observed in this study (Table 1) were chosen from a
sample of 100 methanol maser sources found in the Torun 32 m
telescope blind survey for the 6.7 GHz methanol line in the Galactic
plane area
and
(Szymczak et al. 2002). This flux-limited
(
Jy) subsample includes 25 out of 26 sources
which were undetected prior to the Torun survey.
Therefore, our subsample specifically excludes previously
known sources associated with OH maser emission
(Caswell et al. 1995) or with IRAS-selected
bright UCHII candidates (Schutte et al. 1993;
van der Walt et al. 1995;
Walsh et al. 1997). Assuming that CH3OH
masing precedes the appearance of OH masers and detectable UCHII regions, the objects studied here represent sites of high-mass
star formation at a very early stage. The average peak maser
flux of the 28 targets is 17.3 Jy, a factor of 2.6 lower than
that of the other 72 objects in the original sample, suggesting
that distant or intrinsically faint objects may be
over-represented in our subsample. The subsample studied here
is most certainly not complete.
The coordinates and position uncertainties of the brightest
6.7-GHz maser component in each source are presented in Table 1.
The LSR velocity of this component ()
and its peak flux
density (
)
are given for each target.
The positions and flux densities of all but three objects were
measured with the Mark II - Cambridge baseline of MERLIN in
two sessions between 2002 May and 2003 May. For the three objects
not measured the peak velocities were taken from Szymczak et al.
(2002).
The observational setup and data reduction were described in Niezurawska
et al. (2005). A primary goal of those astrometric
measurements was to determine the positions with sub-arcsecond
accuracy for follow-up VLBI observations. Measurement errors mainly
depended upon the ratio of the beam size to the signal to the noise
ratio (Thompson et al. 1991).
If the emission was complex we took the dispersion of neighbouring
maxima as the position uncertainty. The N-S elongation of the
synthesized beam close to declination 0 produces a split peak,
in which case the position uncertainty in that direction was taken
as half the separation of the maxima.
Consequently, for sources with a single clear peak, the position
errors in right ascension were as small as 0
02 but increased up
to 0
90 for sources with complex emission. The respective errors
in the declination were 0
14 and 1
6. Comparison with our
unpublished VLBI observations reveals position differences between
MERLIN and VLBI measurements no worse than a few tens of
milli-arcseconds. This implies that the values listed in Table 1 are
maximal position errors for most of the targets. The flux densities
listed in Table 1 are a factor of 2-3 lower than those measured with
the single dish (Szymczak et al. 2002) and should be
considered as lower limits.
The exact flux scale and gain-elevation effects for low-declination
sources are not yet fully investigated at 6 GHz but comparison of
calibration sources in common with other experiments shows that
the uncertainties are
.
This suggests that about
half the methanol flux arises on scales larger than the beam size
of 50-100 mas.
Observations were carried out between 2004 September 28 and October 2 with the IRAM 30 m telescope. Ten transitions of HCO+, CO and CS isotopomers were observed. Two or three SIS receivers tuned to single sideband mode were used simultaneously, in combination with the VESPA autocorrelator as well as with 100 kHz and 1 MHz filter banks. Table 2 lists the rest line frequencies, half power beam widths (HPBWs), velocity resolutions and typical system temperatures for each transition.
The data were taken using the position switching mode. The off
positions were typically 30 away from the targets.
In the few cases, especially for the C13O J=2-1 line, where emission
was seen at the reference position, the offsets were increased
up to 45
in the direction away from the Galactic plane. The observations
were centered on the target positions listed in Table 1.
Integration times on-source in total power mode were 12-18 min
per frequency setting, resulting in rms noise levels ranging from
0.05 K at 87 GHz to
0.90 K at 245 GHz for
a spectral resolution of 0.10-0.16 km s-1.
Pointing was checked regularly on nearby continuum sources and
was usually found to be within 2
and always within 3
.
The spectra were scaled to the main beam brightness temperature
(
)
using the efficiencies supplied by the
observatory
.
Comparison of our data with those taken by
Brand et al. (2001) with the same telescope and spectral
resolutions for a source in common, 36.115+0.552, implies consistent
intensity scales within less than 30%.
The data reduction was performed using the CLASS software package.
Low order polynomials were applied to remove baselines from
the calibrated spectra. The line parameters were determined from
Gaussian fits and are listed in Table A.1 where the following
information is given: the rms (1)
noise level,
the extreme velocities
,
where the intensity
drops below the 2
level, the peak temperature
,
the velocity of the peak
,
the line width at half maximum
and the integrated line
intensity
.
Velocities are in the LSR frame.
In several cases where the profiles were non-Gaussian, these values
were read off from the spectra.
In some cases the spectra were smoothed to improve the signal to noise
ratio. In this paper, only the autocorrelation spectra are analyzed.
Table 2: Observing parameters.
The sensitivity achieved and detection rate for each transition are
summarized in Fig. 1. The histogram counts as detected only those
lines with
.
13CO(2-1), C18O(2-1),
CS(2-1) and CS(3-2) lines were detected in all sources.
HCO+(1-0) and H13CO+(1-0) lines were detected in all
but one source. The detection rates in C34S(2-1) and C34S(3-2)
transitions were about half of those in CS(2-1) and CS(3-2) lines.
Because the sensitivities achieved for these four lines were comparable,
these detection rate differences reflect a real drop in the number of
sources exhibiting emission at the same level in the C34S(2-1)
and C34S(3-2) lines.
In contrast, the lower detection rates in the CS(5-4) and C34S(5-4)
transitions appear to reflect the drop in sensitivity.
![]() |
Figure 1: The average sensitivity achieved for each transition ( top) and the detection rate ( bottom). The ratio of the number of detected to observed objects is shown in each of the bars. |
Open with DEXTER |
Five of the observed lines (C18O(2-1), H13CO+(1-0) and the J=2-1, 3-2 and 5-4 transitions of C34S) are expected to be optically thin (Plume et al. 1997; Brand et al. 2001; Purcell et al. 2006). These lines can be used to determine source systemic velocities. In order to test whether these species trace the same or similar kinematic regimes we compare their line parameters. The C34S(5-4) line is excluded from the following analysis due to very low number of detections.
The average intensities of the H13CO+(1-0) and C34S lines
are very similar and are a factor of 8 weaker than the average
intensity of the C18O(2-1) line. This implies that
the parameters of the latter line, especially ,
are
determined most accurately.
We note that some line rest frequencies adopted from Brand et al. (2001) differ slightly from those recommended by
Lovas (2003). In the extreme case of C34S(3-2)
this results in the velocity difference of 0.07 km s-1.
Moreover, the uncertainties in the line rest frequencies introduce
a maximum uncertainty of 0.17 km s-1 to the derived
line velocity for the H13CO+(1-0). We assume that the
above uncertainties affect the velocity estimates by up to 0.24 km s-1. Comparison of the velocities of the four
optically thin lines in our sample reveals no significant
average differences higher than 0.30 km s-1. This suggests
the same kinematic behaviour of these low-density gas tracers.
At 100 K the thermal linewidths of C18O(2-1) and
H13CO+(1-0) are 0.24 km s-1 whereas those of
C34S(2-1) and C34S(3-2) are 0.20 km s-1.
The observed linewidths are much broader, suggesting that turbulence or
bulk gas motions play a significant role in the line broadening.
The mean linewidth ratios of the optically thin lines are
5-10% higher than unity. This bias is relatively small and suggests
that the lines trace the same molecular gas in the beam.
The systemic velocities are listed in Table 4. They are primarily
the C34S(2-1) and C34S(3-2) line peak velocities.
If emission in these lines is absent or weak the other optically
thin lines are used. In two sources, 37.030-0.039 and 37.600+0.426,
the systemic velocities are derived from CS(5-4) and HCO+(1-0)
profiles, respectively. We conclude that in most cases the observed
optically thin lines are well fitted by single Gaussian profiles
(deviations are discussed in Sect. 4.2.2) and their peak velocities
are within 0.4 km s-1 of each other for
almost all sources in the sample. Therefore, these lines provide
reliable estimates of systemic velocity of sufficient accuracy to allow
comparison with the methanol maser velocities listed in
Szymczak et al. (2002).
We analyse the molecular line profiles in order to search for specific signatures of ordered motions such as infall, outflow or rotation. Inward motion can be signposted by blue asymmetric profiles (Myers et al. 1996; Fuller et al. 2005) if the molecular spectral lines trace sufficiently dense gas. Signatures of outflow or rotation are generally manifested in the line wings.
We analysed line asymmetry quantitatively using the asymmetry
parameter (Mardones et al. 1997),
)/
,
where
and
are the peak velocities of optically
thick and optically thin lines, respectively and
is the line width at half maximum of the optically thin line.
We used C34S(2-1) as the optically thin line and the best
available measure of the systemic velocity of MYSOs. Figure 2
shows histograms of the distribution of
for the optically
thick lines 13CO(2-1), HCO+(1-0), CS(2-1), CS(3-2) and
CS(5-4). There are approximately equal numbers of blue and red
asymmetric profiles in our sample. Specifically, we note that there
is no evidence for an excess of blue-shifted emission in the
optically thick lines. Such an excess is postulated as the
signature of inward motion of the gas (Myers et al. 1996).
We suggest that motions other than infall, i.e. turbulence, rotation
and outflow, are the dominant factor producing asymmetric profiles
for most of the sources in our sample. It is possible that infall
signatures could be masked by the relatively low resolution
(typically
0.2 pc, i.e. at a distance of 5 kpc and spatial
resolution of 10
)
of our observations, since even the near
kinematic distances are >3 kpc for
80% of the sources
(the average
is
kpc for
the whole sample).
We therefore examined separately the 5 closest (
kpc) objects with well-determined asymmetry
parameters. Two of these, 26.598-0.024 and 30.316+0.069,
consistently show negative values of
,
i.e. blue asymmetry,
in the 13CO(2-1), HCO+(1-0), CS(2-1) and CS(3-2) line profiles
(Fig. A.1). The corresponding values of
are -0.38, -0.82,
-0.15 and -0.18 for source 26.598-0.024 and -0.43, -0.60,
-0.33 and -0.37 for source 30.316+0.069. Their asymmetry
parameters are smaller for the optically thin lines
(i.e. C18O(2-1) and H13CO+(1-0)), in the range from -0.20 to 0.0. Such a dependence of the amount of blue asymmetry on the
optical depth of the transition is typical in molecular cores
experiencing infall (Narayanan et al. 1998).
We suggest that these two sources are the clearest
infall candidates although source complexity or a combination of outflow
and rotation could contribute to asymmetries in optically thick
profiles.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Histograms of the distribution of the asymmetry parameter ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Wing emission is identified by the presence of residuals after
Gaussian fitting and by comparing the same transitions of optically
thick and thin isotopomers. A single Gaussian function provides a
good fit to most of the optically thin lines analyzed in Sect. 4.1, but
in a few cases the residuals are at a level ,
assumed to
be wing emission. We cannot exclude the possibility that they are
weak separate component(s), given the limitations of our signal to
noise ratio and spectral resolution, but we note that the blue and/or
red residuals are non-Gaussian in most cases. 4 out of 25 sources
detected in the C18O(2-1) line show weak (3-4
)
wing
emission of width 4.5-8 km s-1 (Table 3) which mostly is seen
from the red or blue sides of the profiles. In the
H13CO+(1-0) line the wing emission is seen in 2 out of 17 objects detected (Table 3). 25.410+0.105 is a peculiar source showing
broad (7-8 km s-1) and symmetric wings in both lines
(Fig. A.1).
In contrast, the optically thick lines show more frequent absorption dips, multiple components and wings. In several cases identification of the wings is difficult. The 13CO(2-1) profiles are especially complex; commonly they are fit by 2-5 Gaussians. These profiles can be interpreted as multiple emitting regions along the same line of sight. The 13CO(2-1) lines show evidence of wings in only 3 objects (Table 3).
Table 3: Statistics of wing occurrence. Entries marked Y or N indicate symmetric wings and no wings respectively, Yb or Yr indicate wing emission seen from the blue and red sides of the profiles, respectively. An interrogation point (?) indicates a tentative wing and the absence of entry indicates no observation.
The HCO+(1-0) lines are also complex, often exhibiting two or more
components or broad line wings (Fig. A.1). They appear to consist
of the superposition of several emitters seen along the line of sight
or of (self)absorption by cooler gas on the near side of the
source. Wings are identified in 17 out of 27 detections (Table 4). The wing full width ranges from 6 to 20 km s-1 with a mean
value of
km s-1.
Evidence for wings is seen in the CS(2-1) transition for 9 out of 25 sources and in the CS(3-2) transition for 7 out of 19 sources (Table 3). Their full widths are from 8 to 19 km s-1.
We conclude that 64% (18/28) of the sources show residual line wings at least in one line when a Gaussian profile is used to fit the CO, HCO+ and CS molecular lines. Detection of the wings may indicate molecular outflows from the MYSOs identified by methanol masers but we caution that such detections based on our data alone are only tentative.
Table 4: Derived properties.
In order to estimate the column density of H13CO+from the observed HCO+(1-0) and H13CO+(1-0) line parameters, we follow the procedure outlined in Purcell et al. (2006) and references therein. Briefly, the main assumptions made are: (i) HCO+(1-0) is optically thick and H13CO+(1-0) is optically thin. (ii) Both lines form in the same gas and share the same excitation temperature. (iii) The excitation temperature is equal to the rotational temperature. (iv) The gas is in local thermodynamic equilibrium. (v) The beam filling factor is one for both lines.
The derived H13CO+ column density, N(H13CO+),
(Table 4) ranges from
cm-2
and the median value is
cm-2.
We derive a value of N(H13CO+) a factor of 4 smaller
than the value found by Purcell et al. (2006) for two of
the sources common to both samples, 22.357+0.066 and 23.707-0.198.
This is probably because Purcell et al. applied corrections for
self-absorption, leading to higher estimates of the HCO+(1-0)
line intensities and lower optical depths, compared with our study.
We adopt an abundance ratio of [H13CO+]/[H2] =
10-11
(Girart et al. 2000), from which we obtain the
H2 column density from
cm-2with the median value of
cm-2.
We apply the same method to estimate the column density
of C18O, N(C18O), from the line parameters of
13CO(2-1) and C18O(2-1), assuming that
13CO(2-1) is optically thick and C18O(2-1)
is optically thin. For our sample N(C18O) is
cm-2 (Table 4) with
the median value of
cm-2.
The temperature varies between 10 and 30 K.
The resulting H2 column density ranges from
cm-2
for an abundance ratio [C18O]/[H
(Frerking et al. 1982).
We conclude that the CO and HCO+ data provide consistent
estimates of the column density of H2 towards
the methanol maser sources. The range of N(H2)
derived here is in good agreement with that reported
for high-mass protostar candidates associated with methanol
masers;
cm-2(Codella et al. 2004; Minier et al. 2005;
Purcell et al. 2006). However, it is significantly lower than
N(H
cm-2 reported in
some earlier works (e.g. Churchwell et al. 1992)
for ultra-compact HII regions. This discrepancy is likely due to
the temperatures of 10-30 K derived here which is significantly
lower than
100 K assumed in Churchwell et al. (1992).
We notice that a dispersion of the N(C18O)
is a factor of 7 larger than that of the N(H13CO+) (Table 4).
In two sources 22.357+0.066 and 26.598-0.024 the N(C18O) is
extremely large (>
cm-2). In consequence, the
values of N(H2) derived from the C18O is a factor of 1.5
and 3.1, respectively, higher that those derived from the H13CO+.
This discrepancy suggests that the methanol masers in these sources
probe regions with the abundance ratio of 13CO/C18O significantly lower than a typical ratio of 6.5-7
(Frerking et al. 1982; Beuther et al. 2000).
A decrease of 13CO/C18O ratio is predicted in the PDR model
in a clumpy cloud; in small clumps the C18O molecule is nearly
completely photodissociated whilst it is protected from
photodissociation in large clumps (Beuther et al. 2000,
and references therein).
Object 26.598-0.024 with the highest value of N(C18O) is also
a candidate infall object (Sect. 4.2.1) and one can speculate that it is
the youngest methanol maser in our sample; the maser emission forms
in large clumps at nearly systemic velocity.
Another explanation of low 13CO/C18O intensity
ratio can be that our 11
beam probes the methanol maser sites
where the C18O cores did not coincide with the13CO cores.
This observational fact is well documented in Brand et al. (2001) at least for their sources Mol 98 and Mol 136
(see their Fig. 5). Furthermore, the C18O emission is less
extended than the 13CO emission; by a factor of
3-5 for
common source 35.791-0.175. This explanation seems to be less
plausible as a similar effect can be observed for HCO+ and
H13CO+ lines.
We used the escape-probability modelling code RADEX
on-line
to estimate the density and temperature of the gas required for the
observed line temperature ratios of CS and C34S. Because these
parameters cannot be derived independently for diatomic molecules
(Schilke et al. 2001) we calculate the models for 30,
60 and 90 K with gas number densities of
104-107 cm-3,
CS column densities of
1012-1017 cm-2 and linewidth
of 1 km s-1. We performed the calculations for the 16 sources
for which all three CS lines were detected and we assumed that beam
dilution is comparable for all these transitions. We used a
minimization procedure to fit the models to the observed line
ratios. The derived parameters are listed in Table 4.
We found equally reasonable fits for 10 sources using models at kinetic
temperatures of both 30 and 60 K. Five sources have good fits only
for a single kinetic temperature. We could not find a satisfactory
fit for the source 35.791-0.175 as its CS(2-1) and CS(3-2) lines
are strongly self-absorbed (Fig. A.1) and thus its
line ratios are poorly constrained.
Using a temperature of 60 K the average logarithmic number
density is
and the average logarithmic column density of CS is
for the sample. These values are consistent with 5.9 and 14.4, respectively, reported for a large sample of massive
star formation sites selected by the presence of H2O masers
(Plume et al. 1997). Our estimates are also in good
agreement with those based on the nine-point CS maps of high-mass
protostellar candidates (Beuther et al. 2002a;
Ossenkopf et al. 2001) and calculated with more
sophisticated models. Taking the CS fractional abundance as
(Beuther et al. 2002a)
our estimate of the CS column density implies a mean N(H2) of
cm-2 which is in very good agreement
with the estimates based on CO and HCO+ data (Sect. 5.1).
Our C34S data are less useful to estimate the gas density and temperature because the line ratios are poorly constrained for most of the targets. 26.598-0.024 is the only source for which we are able to determine C34S line ratios but the results are inconsistent with those obtained from the CS data. This indicates that the escape probability model provides only a crude estimate to the physical parameters and the assumption of homogeneous parameters across the cloud is not fulfilled (Ossenkopf et al. 2001).
![]() |
Figure 3: Comparison between the velocity ranges of 6.7 GHz methanol maser (thick bars) (Szymczak et al. 2002) and 13CO (dotted bars) and HCO+ (dashed bars) line wings. The dotted vertical line marks the systemic velocity. |
Open with DEXTER |
The present survey reveals new information regarding the kinematics of molecular gas surrounding massive forming stars. In the following we attempt to answer the question of whether the 6.7 GHz methanol maser and the thermal molecular lines arise from similar or different kinematic regimes.
The velocity ranges of 6.7 GHz methanol masers, 13CO and
HCO+ line wings are plotted in Fig. 3. This plot clearly
shows that the systemic velocity derived in this study (Table 4)
is in good agreement with the methanol maser central velocities,
,
derived from Szymczak et al. (2002).
We note that in many sources
does not coincide with the
peak maser velocity
.
The average value of
is
km s-1. The difference is less than 3 km s-1 for 23 sources
(82%).
is offset by >4 and
8.1 km s-1 with
respect to
in 5 sources (18%), 23.707-0.198,
23.966-0.109, 24.147-0.009, 30.316+0.069 and 32.966+0.041
(Figs. 3 and A.1). This does not necessarily imply that the
different species arise from separate regions along the same line of
sight. Two of the sources, 24.147-0.009 and 32.966+0.041, have
ranges of maser emission
km s-1 which is
a factor of two narrower than the mean value of
km s-1 for the sample but this could be simply an
effect of inhomogeneous conditions in molecular clumps; the maser
emission is sustained in one or a few clumps of sizes a
few
1015 cm (Minier et al. 2000). The effect
of clumping is clearly seen even in regular structures (Bartkiewicz
et al. 2005). The other three sources exhibit
maser emission at velocities which differ from the systemic velocity
by less than 4 km s-1. In source 30.316+0.069 the maser
spectrum is double (Szymczak et al. 2000) and one of the
peaks near 49 km s-1 is close to the systemic velocity of 45.3 km s-1, so that the maser emission related to the thermal
molecular lines has a width of about 6 km s-1. We conclude,
is a reliable estimator of the systemic velocity, with an
accuracy better than 3 km s-1, for most of the sources in our
sample.
![]() |
Figure 4: Histogram of the ratio of methanol maser velocity spread to HCO+ line wings spread. |
Open with DEXTER |
The overlap between the velocity ranges of the methanol masers
and the 13CO/HCO+ line wings is remarkable.
Figure 4 shows a histogram of the ratio of methanol maser
velocity spread,
,
to HCO+ line wings spread.
This ratio ranges from 0.2-6.7 and the median value is 1.3.
Similar trends are observed in the ratio of
to
13CO line wings spread. In 12 out of 23 sources where we detected 13CO/HCO+ wings,
falls entirely within the wing velocity ranges and
in 9 sources there is an overshoot of
4 km s-1.
The 13CO/HCO+ line wings appear to provide a good
indication of the presence of outflow and their widths can serve
as an approximate measure of outflow velocities. The present
observations used beamwidths of 11
and 27
for
13CO and HCO+ lines, respectively, which sample a small
fraction of the molecular cloud, centered on the methanol maser position.
The outflow velocity can be reliably estimated from these data only for the fortunate case when the axis of outflow lies along the line of sight. One source in our sample, 25.410+0.105, has been mapped in the 12CO(2-1) line by Beuther et al. (2002b) who measured a wing velocity range of 14 km s-1, which is comparable with our estimate. In this object the maser emission, with velocity width of 5 km s-1, is closely centered on the systemic velocity. The velocity ranges of the 13CO and HCO+ wings are 11 and 18 km s-1, respectively. This indicates that the maser emission traces a small portion of the kinematic regime of the 13CO and HCO+ lines or it is completely unrelated. Figure 3 indicates that sources 21.407-0.254, 26.598-0.024, 31.156+0.045 and 35.791-0.175 share similar properties with 25.410+0.105. VLBI observations of 35.791-0.175 (Bartkiewicz et al. 2004) support the above interpretation. In this object the 6.7 GHz methanol maser emission appears to come from part of a circumstellar disc.
Our sample contains 4 objects (23.707-0.198, 24.147-0.009, 32.966+0.041, 36.115+0.552) for which the velocity range of the maser emission is very similar to or slightly overshoots that of the 13CO/HCO+ line wings. If we assume that the width of 13CO and HCO+ line wings is a measure of the outflow velocity, in these objects the 6.7 GHz methanol masers arise in outflows. This scenario appears to be supported by VLBI observations of 36.115+0.552 (Bartkiewicz et al. 2004); the maser emission comes from two well separated regions which probably represent a bipolar outflow. In this case the methanol maser traces the same or a very similar kinematic regime as that of the 13CO and HCO+ lines.
Sources 22.355-0.155 and 27.221+0.136 appear to possess complex kinematics in the regions where the methanol masers operate. A close inspection of their 6.7 GHz spectra (Szymczak et al. 2002) suggests that some spectral features arise from the inner parts of the molecular cloud whilst other features form in outflows. VLBI studies of maser emission and detailed measurements of the kinematic properties of the molecular emission are needed to verify this suggestion.
One of the important findings of our observations is the detection of a considerable number of sources with line wings. We identified residual line wings in 18 out of 28 sources when a Gaussian profile was used to fit the CO, HCO+ and CS molecular lines. The line wings appear to be the best indicators of outflow motions in most cases. The presence of line wings in about 64% of sources in the sample suggests a close association of the methanol masers with the evolutionary phase when outflows occur. This result is consistent with that reported by Zhang et al. (2005). They mapped the CO(2-1) line in a sample of 69 luminous IRAS point sources and found that about 60% of them were associated with outflows. However, with the present data we cannot resolve whether the methanol maser sites and the outflows have a common origin. Because of clustering in high mass star formation (e.g. Beuther et al. 2002a) it is possible that some masers in the sample are not actually associated with outflowing sources.
Codella et al. (2004) proposed an evolutionary
sequence for UCHII regions in which the earliest phase
is marked by maser emission and molecular outflows not yet large
enough to be detected with single-dish observations.
The present data suggest that our sources are slightly more
evolved because several of them show evidence of outflows.
Their age therefore seems to be less than a few 104 yr (Codella et al. 2004) which is
consistent with a statistical estimate of
yr
for the methanol maser lifetime (van der Walt 2005).
Acknowledgements
We like to thank the staff of the IRAM 30 m telescope for help with the observations and the unknown referee for helpful comments. This work has been supported by the Polish MNiI grant 1P03D02729.
Table A.1:
Results on line parameters. The parameters for tentative
detections are italicized. i possible interstellar origin of the red-shifted emission,
s smoothed,
w the
in parentheses is the
FWHM taken over the whole line for profiles with a dip which is
<0.5
![]() |
Figure A.1:
Spectra of sources. Source names, molecules and transitions
are indicated. The main beam brightness temperature (
![]() ![]() ![]() |