![]() |
Figure 1:
QSO spectra extracted with a 3
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Left panels: narrow-band images of the QSOs with
overlayed contours of narrow-band images centered on the
Ly![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Line fluxes of Ly![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Velocity differences between the Ly![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Velocity differences between the Ly![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Angular impact parameter vs. redshift. The solid line
corresponds to the size-luminosity relation for an LB* galaxy
(Chen & Lanzetta 2003), while the dotted and dashed lines correspond to
galaxies with B band luminosities
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Column density of neutral hydrogen as a function of impact
parameters for the candidates and previously confirmed objects. The
symbols are similar to the previous figures. The solid and dashed
lines are fits to the power-law relation
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Column density of neutral hydrogen as a function of impact
parameter for the candidates and previously confirmed objects. The
solid and dashed lines show the fit to the exponential relation
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Cumulative distribution of Si metallicities of the six good emission line candidates compared to the remaining part of the sample. The probability that the two distributions are similar is 38% estimated from a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
DLA metallicities as a function of the impact parameters,
where symbols shapes have similar meanings as in the previous
figures. The dotted line shows a fit to all the objects excluding
the limits. This line has a gradient of
-0.024 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |