Table A.3: ${\rm NH_{2}D}$ line parameters with uncertainties (in brackets) from the hyperfine/Gaussian fits.
  ${\rm NH_{2}D}$ 85.93 GHz
Source $\int T_{\rm MB}{\rm d} v$a $\Delta v^b$ $\tau_{\rm tot}$c
  K  ${\rm km~s^{-1}}$ ${\rm km~s^{-1}}$  
G8.13+0.25 0.5 (<0.1) 1.3 (0.3) -
  0.7 (<0.1) 1.8 (0.9) -
G8.68-0.37 - 1.2 (0.1) 2.2 (0.7)
G8.71-0.37 - 1.1 (<0.1) 3.7 (0.6)
G10.21-0.31 - 1.2 (0.1) 3.4 (1.4)
G10.21-0.32 - 1.4 (0.1) 2.3 (1.0)
G10.61-0.33 0.3 (<0.1) 1.5 (0.2) -
G11.11-0.12P1 - 1.0 (0.1) 3.6 (1.5)
G11.11-0.12P4 0.4 (0.1) 1.3 (0.2) -
G12.19-0.12 1.5 (0.1) 3.6 (0.5) -
G13.18+0.06 - 2.2 (0.1) 2.0 (0.5)
G18.17-0.30 - 1.5 (0.1) 4.4 (1.1)
G18.21-0.34 - 1.3 (0.1) 2.0 (0.8)
G23.41-0.23 - 1.7 (0.2) 2.1 (1.3)
G23.44-0.18 1.4 (0.1) 3.1 (0.2) -
G27.29+0.15 0.4 (0.1) 1.5 (0.4) -
G28.34+0.06P2 1.2 (0.1) 1.8 (0.2) -
G29.97-0.05 - 1.4 (0.1) 3.0 (0.6)
G33.71-0.01 0.4 (<0.1) 1.6 (0.3) -
G34.81-0.28 0.8 (0.1) 1.7 (0.1) -
G35.19-1.73 - 1.4 (<0.1) 2.7 (0.4)
G79.34+0.33 - 1.0 (0.9) 1.1 (0.1)
G81.74+0.59 - 2.8 (0.1) 1.5 (0.3)
a Integrated intensity of the line from the Gaussian fits. b FWHM from the hyperfine fits. c Total optical depth from the hyperfine fits.

Note: Similar notations are used for other molecules elsewhere in this paper. The parameter has been fixed for the fit for those entries with no error indicated.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text