All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=7cm]{4981f1a.ps}\hspace{3mm} \includegraphics[width=7cm]{4981f1b.ps} } \par \end{figure}$ Figure 1: The rate coefficient data in RATE06 (dark) is more accurate, and based on more laboratory measurements than RATE99 (light). The panels show a comparison of the numbers of reactions versus their data source ( left) and quoted accuracy ( right), between the two releases.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f2a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f2b.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: The time evolution of the major sulphur-bearing species with RATE99 ( left) and with RATE06 ( right).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f3a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f3b.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: The time evolution of the major oxygen-bearing species without ( left) and with ( right) dipole-enhanced rate coefficients in Rate06.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f4a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f4b.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: The time evolution of the major sulfur-bearing species without ( left) and with ( right) dipole-enhanced rate coefficients in Rate06.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f5a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f5b.ps}\par\end{figure}$ Figure 5: The time evolution of the major sulphur-bearing species with ( left) the rate coefficient for the O + OH reaction taken from Smith et al. (2004) and with ( right) the value taken from Carty et al. (2006). Both model calculations use dipole-enhanced rate coefficients.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{8.8cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=-90,clip]{4981f6.ps}}\end{figure}$ Figure 6: The time evolution of the methanol abundance for various choices of key rate coefficients. The curves calculated using the latest RATE06 rate coefficients are labelled "RATE06'' and "RATE06-dipole'' for the non-dipole and dipole versions respectively. The curve labelled "RATE99'' uses the rate coefficients for the radiative association of CH₃⁺ and H₂O and the dissociative recombination of CH₃OH₂⁺ from that database.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=7cm]{4981f1a.ps}\hspace{3mm} \includegraphics[width=7cm]{4981f1b.ps} } \par \end{figure}$	Figure 1: The rate coefficient data in RATE06 (dark) is more accurate, and based on more laboratory measurements than RATE99 (light). The panels show a comparison of the numbers of reactions versus their data source ( left) and quoted accuracy ( right), between the two releases.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f2a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f2b.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: The time evolution of the major sulphur-bearing species with RATE99 ( left) and with RATE06 ( right).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f3a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f3b.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: The time evolution of the major oxygen-bearing species without ( left) and with ( right) dipole-enhanced rate coefficients in Rate06.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f4a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f4b.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: The time evolution of the major sulfur-bearing species without ( left) and with ( right) dipole-enhanced rate coefficients in Rate06.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f5a.ps}\hspace*{9mm} \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=5.8cm,clip]{4981f5b.ps}\par\end{figure}$	Figure 5: The time evolution of the major sulphur-bearing species with ( left) the rate coefficient for the O + OH reaction taken from Smith et al. (2004) and with ( right) the value taken from Carty et al. (2006). Both model calculations use dipole-enhanced rate coefficients.
Open with DEXTER