Table 2: Comparison between the Eggenberger et al. (2004) extracted raw frequencies (in $\rm\mu Hz$) and the asymptotic relation from the present study ( $\Delta\nu=55.90~\rm\mu Hz$, $\delta\nu_{02}=7.1~\rm\mu Hz$, $\varepsilon =1.913$).
Raw frq. Correction Fit     This study
$\nu$   $\nu$ l n  
630.8         Noise?
651.5 +11.6 = 663.1 665.9 0 10  
662.7   665.9 0 10  
683.5 +11.6 = 695.1 691.5 1 10 ?
720.6   721.8 0 11  
791.8 -11.6 = 780.2 777.7 0 12 778.7
797.9 (809.5?) 803.3 1 12 808.6?
799.7 (811.3?) 803.3 1 12 808.6?
828.5   826.5 2 12  
835.4   833.6 0 13 834.3
856.2   859.2 1 13  
859.8   859.2 1 13  
911.4   915.1 1 14 ?
929.2 +11.6 = 940.8 938.3 2 14  
1009.7 -11.6 = 998.1 1001.3 0 16  
1027.1   1026.9 1 16  
1123.3 -11.6 = 1111.7 1113.1 0 18 1114.2
1131.1         Noise?
1137.0   1138.7 1 18 1138.8
1186.0 +11.6 = 1197.5 1194.6 1 19  
1192.4   1194.6 1 19  
1234.8 -11.6 = 1223.2 1124.9 0 20 1224.2
1251.8   1250.5 1 20 1252.0
1265.6 +11.6 = 1277.2 1273.7 2 20  
1337.2   1336.7 0 22 1335.4
1439.0   1141.4 2 23  
1559.5   1560.3 0 26  


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text