\begin{table}%t2
\caption{
Comparison between the \citet{egge04} extracted raw frequencies 
(in $\rm\mu Hz$) and the asymptotic relation from the present
study ($\Delta\nu=55.90~\rm\mu Hz$,
$\delta\nu_{02}=7.1~\rm\mu Hz$, $\varepsilon=1.913$).}
\label{FCOMP}
\par
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{cr|rccl}
\hline \hline
Raw frq. & Correction & Fit & & & This study \\
% \hline
$\nu$& &$\nu$&$l$&$n$\\
\hline
630.8 &                 &        &   &    & Noise? \\
651.5 & +11.6 = 663.1  &  665.9 & 0 & 10 &        \\
662.7 &                 &  665.9 & 0 & 10 &        \\
683.5 & +11.6 = 695.1  &  691.5 & 1 & 10 & ?      \\
720.6 &                 &  721.8 & 0 & 11 &        \\
791.8 & $-$11.6 = 780.2  &  777.7 & 0 & 12 & 778.7  \\
797.9 &       (809.5?)  &  803.3 & 1 & 12 & 808.6? \\
799.7 &       (811.3?)  &  803.3 & 1 & 12 & 808.6? \\
828.5 &                 &  826.5 & 2 & 12 &        \\
835.4 &                 &  833.6 & 0 & 13 & 834.3  \\
856.2 &                 &  859.2 & 1 & 13 &        \\
859.8 &                 &  859.2 & 1 & 13 &        \\
911.4 &                 &  915.1 & 1 & 14 & ?      \\
929.2 & +11.6 = 940.8  &  938.3 & 2 & 14 &        \\
1009.7& $-$11.6 = 998.1  & 1001.3 & 0 & 16 &        \\
1027.1&                 & 1026.9 & 1 & 16 &        \\
1123.3& $-$11.6 = 1111.7 & 1113.1 & 0 & 18 & 1114.2 \\
1131.1&                 &        &   &    & Noise? \\
1137.0&                 & 1138.7 & 1 & 18 & 1138.8 \\
1186.0& +11.6 = 1197.5 & 1194.6 & 1 & 19 &        \\
1192.4&                 & 1194.6 & 1 & 19 &        \\
1234.8& $-$11.6 = 1223.2 & 1124.9 & 0 & 20 & 1224.2 \\
1251.8&                 & 1250.5 & 1 & 20 & 1252.0 \\
1265.6& +11.6 = 1277.2 & 1273.7 & 2 & 20 &        \\
1337.2&                 & 1336.7 & 0 & 22 & 1335.4 \\
1439.0&                 & 1141.4 & 2 & 23 &        \\
1559.5&                 & 1560.3 & 0 & 26 &        \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}