Table 9: Comparison of sources detected at 8.6 GHz in this survey and in the methanol maser survey of Walsh et al. (1998). (The peak fluxes for the methanol maser survey have been taken from Walsh et al. (1998), however, the integrated fluxes were not presented in their paper but are available from VizieR http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR).
  RMS survey Walsh et al. (1998)
RMS name Peak Integ. Peak Integ.
G268.4222-0.8490 307.1 1696.0 510 1012.0
G305.1967+0.0335 113.1 1105.0 90 394.0
G318.9148-0.1647 60.6 1659.0 120 424.0
G330.9544-0.1817 591.8 1728.0 280 1161.0
G337.7051-0.0575 152.8 171.0 84 94.0
G344.4257+0.0451 63.5 268.3 28 485.0
G345.0061+1.7944 189.9 209.0 140 130.0
G345.4881+0.3148 456.9 2163.0 200 2100a
G346.5234+0.0839 77.0 150.3 45 104.0
G348.6972-1.0263 402.2 1194.0 500 843.0
a The integrate flux for this source obtained from VizieR is incorrect (48.4 mJy),
the correct flux was provided by Andrew Walsh (private com.).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text