\begin{table}%t9
\caption{Comparison of sources detected at 8.6~GHz in this survey and in the methanol maser survey of \citet{walsh1998}. (The peak fluxes for the methanol maser survey have been taken from \citet{walsh1998}, however, the integrated fluxes were not presented in their paper but are available from VizieR {\tt http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR}).
\label{tbl:integrity_check}}
%\centerline
 {\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
\hline
\hline
  &\multicolumn{2}{c}{RMS survey}& \multicolumn{2}{c}{\citet{walsh1998}} \\
  RMS name& Peak&	Integ. & Peak&	Integ.\\ 
\hline 
G268.4222$-$0.8490&307.1&1696.0&510 &1012.0 \\
G305.1967+0.0335&113.1&1105.0&90& 394.0\\
G318.9148$-$0.1647&60.6&1659.0&120 &424.0 \\
G330.9544$-$0.1817&591.8&1728.0&280&1161.0 \\
G337.7051$-$0.0575&152.8&171.0&84 & 94.0 \\
G344.4257+0.0451&63.5&268.3&28& 485.0\\
G345.0061+1.7944&189.9&209.0&140& 130.0 \\
G345.4881+0.3148&456.9&2163.0&200& 2100$^a$ \\
G346.5234+0.0839&77.0&150.3&45& 104.0 \\
G348.6972$-$1.0263&402.2&1194.0&500& 843.0 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\par
\smallskip
$^a$ The integrate flux for this source obtained from VizieR is incorrect (48.4 mJy), the correct flux was provided by Andrew Walsh (private com.).
\end{table}