A&A 458, 79-88 (2006)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065017
S. Samurovic1,2,3 - I. J. Danziger2
1 - Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy
2 -
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy
3 -
Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
Received 13 February 2006 / Accepted 7 July 2006
Abstract
Context. Of the various observational methods used to address the question of dark matter in early-type galaxies there is the possibility of spatial overlap in using kinematics of stars, clusters and X-ray halos.
Aims. To investigate methods for the determination of velocity distribution profiles and deviations from a Gaussian distribution using globular clusters in early-type galaxies, and the implications for dark matter.
Methods. The maximum likelihood method together with standard statistical procedures were used to calculate the velocity dispersion. A new "tracer mass estimator'' was applied to obtain a mass estimate based on the globular clusters, which is then compared to the mass obtained using X-rays.
Results. In NGC 1399 the departures from a Gaussian distribution of the velocities at all radial distances are small. Our conclusion is that in spite of the observations that show that the velocity dispersion decreases between 4 and 10
there is evidence that dark matter exists beyond
.
Key words: Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: structure - dark matter - galaxies: individual: NGC 1399 - Galaxy: star clusters
The presence of dark matter in early-type galaxies continues to be one of the most important unsolved problems in extragalactic astrophysics. Although the currently popular theoretical models (such as cold dark matter models) predict huge amounts of dark matter in these galaxies, some recent observations fail to confirm this for particular galaxies (see, for example, Romanowsky et al. 2003; Peng et al. 2004; Samurovic & Danziger 2005) at least in regions interior to 3-5 effective radii ().
Some other recent works claim to detect the presence of dark matter in ellipticals at smaller distances from the galactic center (see, for example, Thomas et al. 2005; Teodorescu et al. 2005; Cappellari et al. 2006; De Rijcke et al. 2006).
Of special importance are external regions of elliptical galaxies where dark matter might be expected to dominate luminous matter.
Studies that use integrated stellar light are limited to 3 to 4
because of the low surface brightness beyond these regions.
If one wishes to study the mass distribution beyond
one
can use an X-ray methodology that analyzes hot gas at temperatures
K.
Recently, Sivakoff et al. (2004) used the X-ray observations
by CHANDRA and assuming hydrostatic equilibrium found that for the X-ray bright galaxy NGC 1600 within
dark matter does not dominate.
However, two very recent studies by Humphrey et al. (2006) and Fukazawa et al. (2006) used X-ray data to demonstrate the existence of dark matter beyond
.
Some attempts to combine different observational techniques in order to determine the mass of early-type galaxies are given in Kronawitter et al. (2000), Saglia et al. (2000) and Samurovic & Danziger (2005).
Fortunately, beyond
one can use other mass tracers such as globular clusters (GCs) and planetary nebulae (PNe) which can be observed at much larger radii. For example, Côté et al. (2003) recently studied NGC 4472 using 263 GCs out to
570 arcsec (
,
but this should be
if they adopted the RC3 value) and found that the radial velocities and density profiles of globular clusters provide "unmistakable evidence'' for a massive dark halo. Peng et al. (2004) used PNe in NGC 5128 at distances out to 80 kpc (
)
to conclude that dark matter is necessary to explain the observed kinematics, although their value of the mass-to-light ratio (in the B-band)
is much lower than that commonly thought for early-type galaxies at large radii (Bahcall et al. 1995).
The most important quantity that is extracted from both GCs and PNe radial velocity observations is the velocity dispersion. Frequently authors do not explicitly state how they obtained their estimates of this quantity, so one is led to the conclusion that the adopted velocity distribution is purely Gaussian
or that the authors have used a simple statistical definition of the standard deviation to calculate it. In a recent series of papers Dirsch et al. (2003), Richtler et al. (2004) and Dirsch et al. (2004) analyzed the GC system of the galaxy NGC 1399, the central galaxy of the Fornax cluster. They used 468 radial velocities assuming a pure Gaussian distribution to conclude that the velocity dispersion of this galaxy remains approximately constant between 2 and 9 arcmin (corresponding to 12 kpc to 54 kpc, which corresponds to approximately 2.86 and 12.86 ,
under the assumption that one effective radius is 42 arcsec. This value of the effective radius comes from the RC3 catalog (de Vaucoulers et al. 1991) and we verified it using the growth curve of NGC 1399.
In this paper we study the applicability of the assumption of a pure Gaussian distribution function for the GCs using the Dirsch et al. (2004) sample. In Sect. 2 we outline some theoretical aspects relevant to the calculation of the velocity dispersion. In Sect. 3 we present our results for the velocity dispersion based on the sample of Dirsch et al. (2004). In Sect. 4 we compare these results with the results obtained using the X-ray methodology. In Sect. 5 we present mass estimates of NGC 1399 based on globular clusters. Our conclusions are presented in Sect. 6.
When dealing with the velocities related to the GCs and/or PNe one usually assumes a pure Gaussian velocity distribution: for example, Grillmair et al. (1994) analyzed 47 GCs within 9 arcmin in NGC 1399 using the methodology developed by Morrison et al. (1990) to calculate a velocity dispersion (
)
and a mass-to-light ratio in the B-band (
,
interior to 9 arcmin). This technique uses a maximum likelihood approach and Morrison et al. state that since this technique is model-dependent, slightly non-Gaussian distributions can have significant effects on the performance of estimators. Richtler et al. (2004) used the maximum likelihood dispersion estimator given in Pryor & Meylan (1993). The Gaussian estimator can be expressed as:
The maximum likelihood function is then given as
![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison between our calculation of the velocity dispersion of NGC 1399 (open circles) and calculations of Richtler et al. (2004) (filled circles), when a pure Gaussian distribution is assumed. Note that for the outermost point the two values overlap. |
Open with DEXTER |
The globular cluster system of NGC 1399 was presented in Dirsch et al. (2003, wide-field photometry), Richtler et al. (2004, kinematics) and Dirsch et al. (2004, spectroscopy and database). In our analysis, we use the set of 445 GCs for which the estimated uncertainties are
.
This selection enabled us to have a sufficiently large number of clusters in each chosen radial bin and it was also useful in the construction of the bins given in Table 2, which contain approximately 50 clusters each.
We took as a center of NGC 1399 the coordinates (J2000.0) given in the NED database:
and
.
In Fig. 1 we present the comparison of our results (open circles) with those of Richtler et al. (2004)
(filled circles; the second column of their Table 2, no selection was performed). In this case a pure Gaussian distribution is assumed and the agreement is very good.
In Fig. 2 we present the comparison of our results (open symbols) with those of Richtler et al. (2004) (filled symbols) for red (C-R>1.6) and blue (C-R<1.6) clusters using the Richtler et al. bins (see also Table 1) (where the data for Washington C and Kron-Cousins R are taken from Dirsch et al. 2004).
Our total number of red and blue clusters
used in this comparison is 412: we have taken into account all the clusters for which we had colours and for which
.
A pure Gaussian distribution is assumed.
If we place all GCs of a given colour in one bin our results are in very good agreement with those of Richtler et al.: for red GCs we found
and they found
,
and for blue GCs we found
and they found
.
However, there are discrepancies related to the individual bins for the velocity dispersion values of Richtler et al. which we may attribute to our selection criterion: we took only GCs for which
.
Table 1:
Projected velocity dispersion measurements of NGC 1399 for a Gaussian distribution (
).
![]() |
Figure 2: Comparison between our calculation of the velocity dispersion of NGC 1399 for red (open rectangles) and blue clusters (open triangles) and calculations of Richtler et al. (2004) for red (filled rectangles) and blue clusters (filled triangles). In all the cases we assumed a pure Gaussian distribution. |
Open with DEXTER |
In Table 1 we list our results for the projected velocity dispersion in the case of the pure Gaussian velocity distribution (with
)
for the total sample of clusters. In this table we also give our results for blue and red clusters. We have used the bins defined in the Richtler et al. (2004) paper: as can be seen from Fig. 1 with these bins the velocity dispersion remains approximately constant throughout the galaxy.
Errors were calculated using the lengthy expressions of Pryor & Meylan (1993). With Richtler et al. binning of the data there exists a significant overlap of the bins: that is, there are many of the same clusters present in two different bins.
Therefore, we bin the data taking approximately 50 GCs in each separate bin (see Table 2):
using this approach and assuming a Gaussian distribution
, we see a decreasing trend in the velocity dispersion between
and
arcmin (see also Fig. 3; more details are given below in this section).
For example, using large (Richtler et al.) bins the last measured point was calculated for all GCs beyond 6.5 arcmin and some clusters (73 clusters between 6.5 and 7.5 arcmin) were already taken into account in a preceding bin.
For all the given bins we calculated the velocity dispersion and the skewness and kurtosis parameters, s3 and s4, using standard definitions and the NAG routine G01AAF
(see Table 2 in which we present the results based on the maximum likelihood function and, for comparison, the result obtained using the standard statistical definition). We are not trying to reconstruct the full line-of-sight velocity distribution, because it is known (see Merritt 1997) that for small samples such as ours which contain less than a few hundred objects per bin it is not possible - we simply calculate skewness and kurtosis parameters (we do not attribute much of significance to the numerical values of these parameters) in order to determine whether in some bin a significant departure from a Gaussian distribution exists. This is similar to the approach applied by Teodorescu et al. (2005) in their Fig. 18.
The results are graphically presented in Fig. 3 (left).
The results based on the maximum likelihood function and those based on the standard statistical method are in very good agreement.
In order to test whether differences in binning affect our calculations
we also performed the calculations using different binning with variable numbers of the GCs within a bin of fixed length (2 arcmin) without overlap of the bins.
In Tables 3 and 4 we present the results for the blue and red clusters, respectively.
Here we have used a bin width of 2 arcmin in order to include in each bin a statistically significant number of clusters.
In Tables 5 and 6 we present two different types of binnings for which the center of each bin is
placed on odd and even values of the radius, respectively (the obvious exceptions are the first and the last bin in Table 6).
Table 7 presents the results of one additional binning check
for which each bin contains approximately 75 clusters (instead of 50). The results for the blue, red and the total sample (which includes both blue and red clusters) given in Tables 3-7 were obtained using the same standard statistical procedure based on the same NAG routine; they are graphically presented in Figs. 3 (right)
and 4.
Although in Fig. 3 (left) we can see a declining trend in the velocity dispersion, the reduced
value is low for a constant velocity dispersion of 330
and is equal to 1.1 (the best fit case, when the first point is excluded). The
constant value of the velocity dispersion that ranges between 320 and 330
provides the best fit case when N=75 (the right hand panel of Fig. 3), but then
(all points are included in the fit).
For the total sample of clusters (Fig. 3) we see a low velocity dispersion in the inner region (interior to
arcmin), a higher value of the velocity dispersion (beyond
arcmin) and a decrease of the velocity dispersion between
and
arcmin
(more evident in the left panel of Fig. 3, because of the binning applied).
Table 2:
Projected velocity dispersion measurements of NGC 1399 for a Gaussian distribution with a fixed number of clusters per bin (
,
).
![]() |
Figure 3:
Kinematics of NGC 1399 based on the total sample of red and blue GCs. Left: from top to bottom: radial velocity of the GCs in
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The red clusters show a lower velocity dispersion than the blue clusters (see Fig. 4) and for a possible explanation we refer the reader to Sect. 4 of the paper by Richtler et al. (2004). Although both s3 and s4 parameters are small we see that while the calculated s3 parameters for blue clusters differ from those for red clusters, the s4 parameters for both classes are very similar. The binning in both cases was such that we kept the bin width constant and equal to 2 arcmin in order to have enough clusters per bin.
Table 3: Kinematics data for NGC 1399 for the blue clusters.
Table 4: Kinematics data for NGC 1399 for the red clusters.
Table 5: Kinematics data for NGC 1399 for the total sample of blue and red clusters (part 1).
Forte et al. (2005) state there are indications (albeit not conclusive) that there could be an association between the red GCs and the stellar component and that blue GCs show a spatial distribution which is similar to that inferred for dark matter. However any attempt to draw conclusions from this is outside the province of this paper.
As an additional test we also calculated the velocity dispersion in the inner part of NGC 1399 (interior to
arcmin) in which we have 14 GCs (the innermost at
arcmin and the outermost at
arcmin).
We calculated that for the total sample of blue and red clusters the velocity dispersion is
.
We note that this result is in agreement with the integrated stellar light observations thus giving credence to the feasibility of calculating galaxy kinematics even with the small number of mass tracers in a given bin.
The X-ray methodology of studying mass in early-type galaxies is well known (see e.g. Mathews & Brighenti 2003; Samurovic & Danziger 2005). We assume that spherical symmetry in the galaxy holds, and that the condition of hydrostatic equilibrium is valid. For clarity we adopt the following 3 formulae from the referenced papers:
Although the X-ray data suggest that beyond
in NGC 1399 there should be a significant amount of dark matter, we note, however, that since NGC 1399 is a central galaxy of the Fornax cluster, the confinement of the hot gas may be
assisted by the external pressure of the intercluster medium (ICM) and is not wholly due to the gravitational field of NGC 1399 (Bertin 2000).
![]() |
Figure 4:
Kinematics of NGC 1399 based on the total sample of blue ( left) and red ( right) GCs.
From top to bottom: radial velocity of the GCs in
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 6: Kinematics data for NGC 1399 for the total sample of blue and red clusters (part 2).
Table 7: Kinematics data for NGC 1399 for the total sample of blue and red clusters (part 3).
![]() |
Figure 5:
Estimates of the total mass-to-light ratio in the B-band in the solar units using X-rays assuming hydrostatic equilibrium and isotropic velocity distribution presented with three shaded regions. Three different
regions of the constant temperature were used beyond one effective radius:
region (1) is between 40 and 100 arcsec, region (2) is between 100 and 140 arcsec and the region (3) is between 140 and
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Recently Evans et al. (2003) introduced a new "tracer mass estimator'' which provides an estimate of the enclosed mass from the projected positions and line-of-sight velocities of a given tracer population (such as GCs and PNe). One can assume that the tracer population is spherically symmetric and has a number density that obeys a power law:
For the application of Eq. (10) we split the total sample of GCs into 5 bins:
each bin (except the first one which is 2 arcmin wide) contains the previous one in addition to a fixed width of 2 arcmin.
Our results (for mass and mass-to-light ratios) for the isotropic case are given in Table 8. In this table for comparison we also
provide estimates for mass and mass-to-light ratio obtained using X-ray methodology in the same bins. The errors for the estimates based on the X-rays
reflect uncertainty in the temperature.
In the calculation of the mass (and mass-to-light ratios) based on the GCs we used
which was derived using a least-squares fit applied to the data published by Dirsch et al. (2003) for all the clusters in the sample. The outermost point at 10 arcmin was taken. The data from the Table 8 are graphically presented in Fig. 6. The large box contains estimates for the total mass-to-light ratio (open and filled triangles are for the determination based on the X-ray technique assuming hydrostatic equilibrium (open triangles are for
and filled triangles are for
)
and open circles are for the estimate based on GCs assuming isotropy.
In the estimates of the mass-to-light ratio based on the X-rays we take T=1 keV in the first bin, and T=1.30 keV in all the other bins.
In a small inserted box we plot the estimates for the mass: the symbols have the same meaning as in the large box. In the inner regions (interior to
arcmin) of NGC 1399 we have good agreement between the two techniques. At
arcmin and beyond the estimate of the mass (and the mass-to-light ratio) based on
starts to diverge from the estimate based on the GCs, whereas the estimate based on
is consistent with it up to 8 arcmin. Note also that the estimate of Grillmair et al. (1994) is consistent with both results based on the GCs and X-rays (
case).
The only point for which there seems to be a discrepancy between the X-ray and the GC estimates is the one at 10 arcmin: the X-rays (with
)
predict the mass-to-light ratio of
whereas the estimate based on the GCs gives
.
There may be two possible sources of this discrepancy:
(i) errors given in the X-ray case should be understood as minimal, because in these estimates we took into account only the uncertainty in temperature (
). Note that Jones et al. (1997) at 10 arcmin calculated
(scaled to the distance used in our paper; see their Fig. 7 - in our Fig. 6 we plotted the points at 3 and 10 arcmin based on their plot); note also that at
arcmin their best fit for the temperature is 1.22 keV which is somewhat lower than the value we took thus implying a lower mass-to-light ratio which is closer to that obtained using GC methodology;
(ii) the discrepancy between the two results may be real and might be attributed to the effect of a contribution to the X-ray gas pressure by the ICM referred to above. Peng et al. (2004) also used the Evans et al. (2003) "tracer mass estimator'' to calculate the mass-to-light ratio in NGC 5128. They found at 80 kpc (
)
that
which suggests even smaller amounts of dark matter in the outer parts of this galaxy.
Different cosmological models and their predictions for the mass may in principle be tested. Richtler et al. (2004, references therein) tested among others, logarithmic potentials and Navarro et al. (1996, NFW) mass profiles. With the data which extend out to
arcmin it is difficult to draw firm conclusions; the mass predicted by both NFW profile and the logarithmic potential is closer to the mass based on GCs and X-rays for which
than to the X-rays for which
:
at
arcmin (scaled to the distance used in our paper; see the large open pentagon in the small inserted box of Fig. 6).
We see in Fig. 6 that there is agreement between the following four different estimates of the total mass-to-light ratio: (i) our estimate based on the GCs; (ii) our estimate based on the X-rays (the case with
); (iii) the estimate based on the Grillmair et al. (1994) paper based on the GCs; and (iv) the estimate based on the NFW approach (this last one is given only in the small inserted box of Fig. 6).
In this paper we investigated the line-of-sight velocity distribution (LOSVD) calculated from the observations of GCs in the early-type galaxy NGC 1399. We have used recently published Dirsch et al. (2004) data from which we calculated velocity dispersions using both standard statistical procedures and the maximum likelihood approach.
![]() |
Figure 6:
Mass estimates using the GCs and X-ray methodology. Large box: estimates for the total mass-to-light ratio in the B-band in the solar units as a function of radius; the
triangles are for the determination based on the X-ray technique assuming hydrostatic equilibrium (the open triangles for
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 8: Mass estimates of NGC 1399 using globular clusters and X-rays.
Our conclusions are as follows.
Acknowledgements
We thank Francesca Matteucci for useful discussions. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. S.S. was supported with grants from MIUR COFIN 1998 Prot. No. 9802909231_001, the "Regione Friuli-Venezia-Giulia'' L.R. 3/98, CNAA Prot. No. 14/a and ASI Prot. No. I/R/043/02. S.S. expresses his gratitude to the TRIL (Training and Research in Italian Laboratories) programme of the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. S.S. has been partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia through the project No. 1468, "Structure Kinematics, and Dynamics of the Milky Way''. We thank the anonymous referee for the useful comments which helped to improve the manuscript.