- ... Lamers
- Please
note the typo in Lamers' Eq. (5) where it should be
instead of
,
and that in his paper
is measured
from the equator.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... radius
- There exists one exception in the
literature: The (more or less) pole-on LMC star R 66 is assumed
to have a radius of 125
(see Table 1 in Zickgraf
2006), while all other stars fall well below our adopted radius
of 82
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.