Table 6: Dry and wet tropospheric zenith path delays ( $\tau _{\rm dtrp}$ and $\tau _{\rm wtrp}$) at the EVN stations along with the adopted rms errors $\Delta \tau _{\rm dtrp}$ and $\Delta \tau _{\rm wtrp}$ in our Monte Carlo simulations.

Stations		 Dry trop.   Wet trop.
        Mean   Max
  $\tau _{\rm dtrp}$ $\Delta \tau _{\rm dtrp}$   $\tau _{\rm wtrp}$ $\Delta \tau _{\rm wtrp}$   $\tau _{\rm wtrp}$ $\Delta \tau _{\rm wtrp}$
  (cm) (cm)   (cm) (cm)   (cm) (cm)
Effelsberg 220 0.5    8  2.7   20  6.7
Hartebeesthoek 199 0.5   10  3.3   17  5.7
Medicina 231 0.5   11  3.7   18  6.0
Noto 229 0.5   12  4.0   20  6.7
Onsala 230 0.5    8  2.7   14  4.7
Sheshan 231 0.5   22  7.3   36 12.0
Urumqi 210 0.5   10  3.3   10  3.3
Westerbork 220 0.5    8  2.7   20  6.7
Wettzell 215 0.5    7  2.3   13  4.3
Yebes 208 0.5    5  2.0    5  2.0


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text