![]() |
Figure 1:
Comparing spot longitudes from our time series modelling (small
crosses and dots with error bars) with results from Korhonen et al.
(2002, 2004; big empty triangles and circles), and with spot
longitudes measured in all Doppler images of FK Com available to us to date
(Korhonen et al. 2005, bigger dots). The bi-modal distribution of
spot longitudes is evident using all of the three different techniques. The longitudes are plotted betwen 0 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2:
From top to bottom: FK Com data; spot radii (crosses: spot 1,
dots: spot 2, triangles: polar spot); spot longitudes (crosses:
spot 1, dots: spot 2) for the years 1987-2004. Broken vertical lines represent the times when the two low-latitude spots are 180 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Top: the distribution of longitudes of the two low-latitude spots
of FK Com when they are closer to each other a) around 0 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 4: The distribution of longitude distances of the two low-latitude spots from the present results (horizontally shaded), from Korhonen et al. (2002, 2004; vertically shaded), and from Doppler maps (filled). Results of the present paper are plotted with respect to the left y-axis, the other results (lower in number) with respect to the right y-axis. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: Time-series fit for the 1999 dataset. Note the continuous change in the amplitude and the practically vanished amplitude at JD 2 451 310; and, that the rotation period of FK Com is 2.4 days. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Time-series fit for the 1999 dataset ( top panel). The
spot longitudes are shown in the middle panel (circles:
spot 1, triangles: spot 2). Filled symbols are results
taken from Korhonen et al. (2002). The bottom panel shows spot sizes (circles: spot 1, triangles: spot 2, squares: polar spot). Note
the longitude discontinuity of spot 2 by about 90 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7: Modelling the 1999 dataset in 10 segments with light-curve inversion. Left panels show the data with the fits, the corresponding right panels are the maps of the spot filling factor. Note the very small amplitude in the light curve for this time period. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Time-series fit for the 1997 dataset. The light variability changes smoothly and is never below 0.1 mag. A sudden change in the light curve shape is seen shortly after JD 2 450 500. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Time-series fit for the 1997 dataset ( top panel). The spot
longitudes are shown in the middle panel (circles: spot 1, triangles:
spot 2). Filled triangles are results of the light-curve inversion. The bottom panel shows spot sizes (circles: spot 1, triangles: spot 2,
squares: polar spot). Note that spot 2 either disappeared or merged
with spot 1 near JD 2 450 500, and a new spot 2 appeared shifted
by about 100 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10: Modelling the 1997 dataset in 10 segments with the light-curve inversion method. Left panels show the data with the fits, the corresponding right panels are the maps of the spot filling factor. |
| Open with DEXTER | |