Table 1: Comparison of the estimates of the projected rotational velocities found using goodness-of-fit (GOF) and Fourier transform (FT) techniques. For both cases, the ranges of the estimates and their medians are listed. Also tabulated are the maximum possible values of v sin i taken directly from Ryans et al. together with the number (n) of lines considered in the current comparison.
Star Goodness-of-fit Fourier Transform n

Range Median Max. Range Median

HD 2905
1-22 20 $\leq$ 60 51-59 52 4

HD 13854 11-15 13 $\leq$ 40 31-34 32 3

HD 21291 5-8 7 $\leq$ 20 16-18 17 2

HD 24398 4-19 9 $\leq$ 40 34-39 36 4

HD 34085 4-15 10 $\leq$ 30 20-26 25 6

HD 38771 5-21 9 $\leq$ 50 46-55 50 4

HD 41117 3-24 14 $\leq$ 40 40-42 41 2

HD 193183 2-47 20 $\leq$ 50 40-50 45 11

HD 204172 3-71 57 $\leq$ 60 57-70 62 8

HD 206165 3-41 11 $\leq$ 40 25-41 35 7

HD 208501 9-11 11 $\leq$ 30 25-30 28 4

**Table 1:** Comparison of the estimates of the projected rotational velocities found using goodness-of-fit (GOF) and Fourier transform (FT) techniques. For both cases, the ranges of the estimates and their medians are listed. Also tabulated are the maximum possible values of v sin i taken directly from Ryans et al. together with the number (n) of lines considered in the current comparison.
Star	Goodness-of-fit	Fourier Transform	n
	Range	Median	Max.	Range	Median
HD 2905	1-22	20	$\leq$ 60	51-59	52	4
HD 13854	11-15	13	$\leq$ 40	31-34	32	3
HD 21291	5-8	7	$\leq$ 20	16-18	17	2
HD 24398	4-19	9	$\leq$ 40	34-39	36	4
HD 34085	4-15	10	$\leq$ 30	20-26	25	6
HD 38771	5-21	9	$\leq$ 50	46-55	50	4
HD 41117	3-24	14	$\leq$ 40	40-42	41	2
HD 193183	2-47	20	$\leq$ 50	40-50	45	11
HD 204172	3-71	57	$\leq$ 60	57-70	62	8
HD 206165	3-41	11	$\leq$ 40	25-41	35	7
HD 208501	9-11	11	$\leq$ 30	25-30	28	4

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text