Table A.1: Comparison of the best fit parameters obtained using the standard matrix (ISDC) and the new A.S. version.
Parameter OSA 4.2 A.S. Version Other experiment
Crab nebula+pulsar: Power Law  
$\alpha$ $2.19\pm0.03^*$ $2.09\pm0.03$ 2.1
K (ph cm-2 s-1 KeV-1) $10.2\pm0.2^*$ $9.6\pm0.2$ 9.7
$\chi ^2$ (d.o.f.) 5.6 (95) 1.3 (95)  
      Ref. (1)
GX 1+4: Comptonization continuum model (COMPTT in XSPEC)
T0 (keV) 1.27 (frozen) 1.27 (frozen) 1.27 +1.4-1.1
$T_{\rm e}$(keV) $13.5\pm0.5$ $12.6\pm0.4$ 10.3 +13-9
$\tau$ $2.7\pm0.1$ $3.3\pm0.2$ 3.7 +4-3
K (ph cm-2 s-1 KeV-1) ( $2.1\pm0.1)\times 10^{-2}$ ( $1.9\pm0.1)\times 10^{-2}$ 2.1 $^{+2.3}_{-1.8}\times 10^{-2}$
$\chi ^2$ (d.o.f.) 1.5 (58) 1.1 (58)  
      Ref. (2)
Cygnus X1: Cut-off power law
$\alpha$ $1.66\pm0.04^*$ $1.45\pm0.04$ $1.45\pm0.01$
$E_{\rm c}$ (keV) $158\pm12^*$ $122\pm7$ $162\pm9$
K (ph cm-2 s-1 KeV-1) $1.7\pm0.3^*$ $1.2\pm0.3$ $0.91\pm0.04$
$\chi ^2$ (d.o.f.) 3.2 (48) 1.9 (48)  
      Ref. (3)
Sco X1: Bremstralung + Power law
KT (keV) $4.2\pm0.1$ $4.3\pm0.1$ $4.51\pm0.08$
Flux $_{20-50 ~\rm keV}$ (erg cm-2 s-1) ( $5.5\pm0.3)\times 10^{-9}$ ( $6.5\pm0.4)\times 10^{-9}$ ( $7.4\pm0.6)\times 10^{-9}$
$\alpha$ $2.9\pm0.2$ $2.8\pm0.2$ $2.4\pm0.3$
Flux $_{20-200~\rm keV}$ [erg cm-2 s-1] ( $0.8\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-9}$ ( $0.7\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-9}$ ( $1.04\pm 0.08)\times 10^{-9}$
$\chi ^2$ (d.o.f.) 1.3 (52) 1.4 (52)  
      Ref. (4)
* Errors are computed introducing systematic errors in order to reduce the $\chi ^2$ below 2.0.
(1) Toor & Seward (1974); (2) Galloway (2000); (3) Dove et al. (1998); (4) D'Amico et al. (2001).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text