![]() |
Figure 1: Synchrotron spectra emitted by an electron population with log-parabolic (dashed lines) and power-law log-parabolic energy distributions (Eq. (11)) (solid lines), computed for r values in the interval 0.50-1.20. Spectra were shifted on the vertical scale to avoidconfusion. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: The relation between the peak frequencies of the synchrotron SED and those of the energy spectrum of the emitting electrons computed using the SFD (Eq. (17)) for the LP and LPPL cases (see text). The abscissa is the inverse of the electron spectrum curvature to show the linear trend expected from Eq. (18). The dashed line is the best fit computed for 1/r >0.33. Note the small deviations of LPPL points from the best fit line at low values of 1/r. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
The relation between the log-parabolic curvature parameters
of the electron energy distribution r and those of the
synchrotron radiation computed applying the ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Time evolution of the SR spectrum ( upper panel) and of the
corresponding spectrum of electrons, multiplied by the square
of the Lorentz, under SR losses.
The injection spectrum was a log-parabola with
s=1.2 and r=0.7, corresponding to a peak energy of
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Time evolution of the log-parabolic curvature parameters r of the electron spectrum ( upper line) and b of the SR SED ( lower line) computed by means of a best fit around the peak. Solid lines are linear best fits to the computed values. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: The relation between the peak frequency and the curvature parameter b of the SR spectra plotted in the upper panel of Fig. 4. The dashed line is the best fit to the computed values. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
The SR and SSC spectral energy distributions emitted by an electron
population with power-law log-parabolic distributions (Eq. (11)),
computed for r values in the interval 0.50-1.20.
Upper panel: spectra for
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Dependence of the peak frequencies upon the particle characteristic energies
in the SED of a single zone SSC model.
Upper panel: frequency of SSC peak vs. electron Lorentz factors of the
peaks for r values in the interval 0.50-1.90, the three curves
correspond to
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
The curvature parameter b of the IC spectrum for a single zone SSC model
plotted against the electron spectral curvature r.
Dashed-dotted lines are the curvature parameters for the electrons and solid lines
for SR component.
Dashed lines correspond to IC curvatures evaluated in three adjacent frequency
intervals with an amplitude of about a decade selected starting from
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Two spectral energy distributions of Mkn 501 during the low and high states observed on 7 and 16 April 1997, respectively. X-ray points are from Paper II, TeV points are simultaneous CAT data (Djannati-Atai et al. 1999) and soolid lines are the spectra computed in a 1-zone SSC model for the SR and IC components. In the upper panel IC, spectra have been absorbed (dashed lines) by interaction with infrared EBL photons according to the LLL model by Dwek & Krennich (2005). In the lower panel EBL absorption was neglected. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: Two spectral energy distributions of Mkn 501 during the high states observed on 7, 11 April 1997 ( upper panel) and 7, 16 April 1997 ( lower panel). X-ray points are from Paper II, and TeV points are simultaneous CAT data (Djannati-Atai et al. 1999). Thin solid lines are the spectra computed in a 2-zone SSC model for the SR and IC components, dashed lines are the spectra of the high-energy flaring component, and the thick solid line is that of a slowly evolving component. |
Open with DEXTER |