All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{3986f01a.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Slope of the LF as a function of wavelength. The filled red squares denote the values derived in FDFLF I, whereas the filled red dots are taken from this work (Table 3, upper part). Local slope values (black) are shown as filled squares (Baldry et al. 2005), open squares (Driver et al. 2005), filled triangles (Budavári et al. 2005), open triangles (Blanton et al. 2003), and as an asterisk (Norberg et al. 2002).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{3986f02a.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: SEDs grouped according to their spectral type. See text for details.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=18cm,clip]{3986f03a.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: LFs for the four SED types in the redshift intervals $0.45 < z \le 0.85$ ( upper panels), $0.85 < z \le 1.31$ ( middle panels), and $1.31 < z \le 1.91$ ( lower panels): SED type increases from left to right. The filters are color-coded and denoted in the upper part of the various panels. For clarity, the three-parameter Schechter function fit to the data is shown as a solid line with the same color coding as the LF.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{3986f04a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=6cm,clip]{3986f04b.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Schechter functions fitted to the LFs in the UV ( left panels), as well as in the i'-band ( right panels) for the redshift intervals $0.45 < z \le 0.85$ ( upper panels), $0.85 < z \le 1.31$ ( middle panels), and $1.31 < z \le 1.91$ ( lower panels). The solid lines show the best-fitting Schechter functions for the four SED types. The SED type is color-coded and denoted in the upper left panel. The dotted black line shows the total LF (as fitted to the data), whereas the shaded region represents the corresponding 1 $\sigma$ error of the latter. For the slope values of the different SED types, see Table 5. Please note that we show the SED type LFs to the limiting magnitude where the $V/V_{\rm max}$ begins to contribute by at most a factor of 1.5, which is more conservative than for the overall LF, for which we allow a correction factor of 3.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{3986f05a.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: Luminosity densities in the UV ( left panel) and i' ( right panel) bands for the four SED types in the redshift intervals $0.45 < z \le 0.85$ , $0.85 < z \le 1.31$ , and $1.31 < z \le 1.91$ . The luminosity densities are completeness-corrected to zero luminosity (ZGL, see text for details). The values are listed in Table 4.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f06a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...e.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f06f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: The LFs in the r'-band from low redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=0.3$ , upper left panel) to high redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ , lower right panel). The filled (open) symbols show the LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ . The fitted Schechter functions for a fixed slope $\alpha$ are shown as solid lines. Note that we only fit the LFs from $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ to $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ . The parameters of the Schechter functions can be found in Table 6. The dotted line represents the local r'-band LF derived from the SDSS (Blanton et al. 2003). The Schechter fit for redshift $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ is indicated as a dashed line in all panels.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f07a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...7e.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f07f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 7: The LFs in the i'-band from low redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=0.3$ , upper left panel) to high redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ , lower right panel). The filled (open) symbols show the LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ . The fitted Schechter functions for a fixed slope $\alpha$ are shown as solid lines. Note that we only fit the LFs from $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ to $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ . The parameters of the Schechter functions can be found in Table 7. The dotted line represents the local i'-band LF derived from the SDSS (Blanton et al. 2003). The Schechter fit for redshift $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ is indicated as a dashed line in all panels.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f08a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...8e.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f08f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 8: The LFs in the z'-band from low redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=0.3$ , upper left panel) to high redshift ( $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ , lower right panel). The filled (open) symbols show the LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ . The fitted Schechter functions for a fixed slope $\alpha$ are shown as solid lines. Note that we only fit the LFs from $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ to $\langle z\rangle=3.2$ . The parameters of the Schechter functions can be found in Table 8. The dotted line represents the local z'-band LF derived from the SDSS (Blanton et al. 2003). The Schechter fit for redshift $\langle z\rangle=0.6$ is indicated as a dashed line in all panels.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f09a.ps}\hspace*{3mm} ... ...9e.ps}\hspace*{3mm} \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f09f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 9: Comparison of the red FDF LFs in the redshift range $\langle z\rangle=0.3$ ( upper panels) and $\langle z\rangle=0.65$ ( lower panels) with the local Schechter functions as derived in the SDSS by Blanton et al. (2003, dotted line) and Blanton et al. (2005, dashed line). The filled (open) symbols show the FDF LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f10a.ps}\includegraphi... ...m,clip]{3986f10b.ps}\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f10c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 10: The local LFs as given by Blanton et al. (2003) for the r' ( left panel), i' ( middle panel), and z' ( left panel) bands. The dotted lines in all plots represent the best fitting Schechter function of Blanton et al. (2003). The solid points and the associated errorbars are derived by the Schechter values and corresponding errors of the latter (see text). The dashed lines represent the result of Blanton et al. (2001) after renormalizing $\phi ^\ast$ according to Liske et al. (2003). We also fit a Schechter function (solid line) with a fixed slope of -1.33 as derived from the FDF data do the LF (solid dots). The corresponding $M^\ast$ , $\phi ^\ast$ , and the reduced $\chi ^2$ of the fit are also given in the figures.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f11a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...1b.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f11c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 11: $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$ confidence levels of the parameters a and b in different bands (r', i', and z') for the evolutionary model described in the text. Left panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ are used (Case 1). The values for a and b can be found in Table 9. Middle panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 3.21$ are used (Case 2). The values for a and b can be found in Table 9. Right panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ as well as the local LF of Blanton et al. (2003) are used (Case 3). The values for a and b can be found in Table 9.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f12a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...2b.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f12c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 12: Relative evolution of $M^\ast$ with redshift. The solid lines represent the best fit of the evolutionary model according to Eq. (1). Left panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 1). Middle panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 3.21$ are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 2). Right panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ , as well as the local LF of Blanton et al. (2003), are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 3) (see also text).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f13a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...3b.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f13c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 13: Relative evolution of $\phi ^\ast$ with redshift. The solid lines represent the best fit of the evolutionary model according to Eq. (1). Left panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 1). Middle panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 3.21$ are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 2). Right panel: FDF LFs between redshift $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.65$ and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.26$ , as well as the local LF of Blanton et al. (2003), are used to constrain the evolutionary model (Case 3) (see also text).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f14a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f14b.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 14: Left panel: comparison of the R-band luminosity function of the FDF (filled/open circles $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.3$ ) with the Schechter function derived in Lin et al. (1996) ( $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.1$ ). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ . The triangles show the r'-band FDF LF at $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.3$ for SED type 1 galaxies. Right panel: Comparison of the Gunn-r-band LF of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Lin et al. (1997) (z=0.2-0.6). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f15a.ps}\hspace*{4mm} \includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f15b.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 15: Comparison of the V-band ( left panel) and R-band ( right panel) LF of the FDF with the local ( $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.06$ ) Schechter function derived in Brown et al. (2001). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{3986f16a.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 16: Comparison of the V-band luminosity function of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Shapley et al. (2001) at $\langle z \rangle\sim 3.0$ . The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ , where the cut-off at low luminosity indicates the limiting magnitude of the sample.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.3cm,clip]{3986f17a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...7k.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.3cm,clip]{3986f17l.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 17: Comparison of the V ( left panels), R ( middle panels), and I ( right panels) band LF of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Ilbert et al. (2005) (VVDS) at $0.20 <z\le 0.40$ (first row, light gray), $0.40 <z\le 0.60$ (first row, dark gray), $0.60 <z\le 0.80$ (second row, light gray), $0.80 <z\le 1.00$ (second row, dark gray), $1.00 <z\le 1.30$ (third row), and $1.30 <z\le 2.00$ (fourth row). The shaded regions of all plots with $z \le 1$ are based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ . Only in the two high redshift bins (third and fourth row) is the shaded region based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ and $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ . Please note that we use the average error, if the upper and lower values reported by Ilbert et al. (2005) disagree.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{3986f18a.ps}\hspace*{4mm} ... ...8c.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=6.7cm,clip]{3986f18d.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 18: Comparison of the LF in the r'-band of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Wolf et al. (2003): $0.2 <z\le 0.4$ ( upper left panel, light gray), $0.4 <z\le 0.6$ ( upper left panel, dark grey), $0.6 <z\le 0.8$ ( upper right panel), $0.8 <z\le 1.0$ ( lower left panel), $1.0 <z\le 1.2$ ( lower right panel). The shaded regions of nearly all plots are based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ . Only in the highest redshift bin ( lower right panel) the shaded region is based only on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ and $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ . The cut-off at low luminosity indicates the limiting magnitude of the sample.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f19a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...9b.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{3986f19c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 19: Comparison of the luminosity function in the R-band of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Chen et al. (2003): $0.50 <z\le 0.75$ ( left panel), $0.75 <z\le 1.00$ ( middle panel), and $1.00 <z\le 1.50$ ( right panel). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ and $\Delta \alpha$ for $0.50 <z\le 0.75$ ( left panel). For $0.75 <z\le 1.00$ ( middle panel) and $1.00 <z\le 1.50$ ( right panel), the shaded region is based only on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ and $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ . The cut-off at low luminosity indicates the limiting magnitude of the sample.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f20a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...0e.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f20f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 20: Comparison of the R-band LF of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Dahlen et al. (2005) at $0.10 <z\le 0.82$ , $0.82 <z\le 1.12$ , $1.12 <z\le 1.37$ , $1.37 <z\le 1.59$ , $1.59 <z\le 1.80$ , and $1.80 <z\le 2.00$ ( from upper left to lower right panel). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ for all panels. The cut-off of the shaded region at low luminosity indicates the limiting magnitude of the sample.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f21a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...1b.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f21c.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 21: Comparison of the R-band LF of the FDF with predictions based on Kauffmann et al. (1999) (solid line): $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.20$ , $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.62$ , and $\langle z \rangle\sim 1.05$ , ( from left to right panel). The filled (open) symbols show the LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ . The drops of the theoretical curves towards the faint ends are caused by the limited mass resolution of the models, see Kauffmann et al. (1999) for details.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f22a.ps}\hspace*{2mm} ... ...2e.ps}\hspace*{2mm} \includegraphics[width=5.4cm,clip]{3986f22f.ps} \end{figure}$ Figure 22: Comparison of the I-band LF of the FDF with predictions based on Kauffmann et al. (1999) (solid line): $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.20$ , $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.62$ , $\langle z \rangle\sim 1.05$ , $\langle z \rangle\sim 1.46$ , $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.12$ , and $\langle z \rangle\sim 2.97$ ( from upper left to lower right panel). The filled (open) symbols show the LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ . The drops of the theoretical curves towards the faint ends are caused by the limited mass resolution of the models; see Kauffmann et al. (1999) for details.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.1cm,clip]{3986f02a.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: SEDs grouped according to their spectral type. See text for details.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{3986f05a.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: Luminosity densities in the UV ( left panel) and i' ( right panel) bands for the four SED types in the redshift intervals $0.45 < z \le 0.85$ , $0.85 < z \le 1.31$ , and $1.31 < z \le 1.91$ . The luminosity densities are completeness-corrected to zero luminosity (ZGL, see text for details). The values are listed in Table 4.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f09a.ps}\hspace{3mm} ... ...9e.ps}\hspace{3mm} \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,clip]{3986f09f.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: Comparison of the red FDF LFs in the redshift range $\langle z\rangle=0.3$ ( upper panels) and $\langle z\rangle=0.65$ ( lower panels) with the local Schechter functions as derived in the SDSS by Blanton et al. (2003, dotted line) and Blanton et al. (2005, dashed line). The filled (open) symbols show the FDF LF corrected (uncorrected) for $V/V_{\rm max}$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f15a.ps}\hspace*{4mm} \includegraphics[width=7.3cm,clip]{3986f15b.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 15: Comparison of the V-band ( left panel) and R-band ( right panel) LF of the FDF with the local ( $\langle z \rangle\sim 0.06$ ) Schechter function derived in Brown et al. (2001). The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ .
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{3986f16a.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure 16: Comparison of the V-band luminosity function of the FDF with the Schechter function derived in Shapley et al. (2001) at $\langle z \rangle\sim 3.0$ . The shaded region is based on $\Delta$ $M^\ast$ , $\Delta \phi ^\ast$ , and $\Delta \alpha$ , where the cut-off at low luminosity indicates the limiting magnitude of the sample.
Open with DEXTER