**Table 3:** Simulations: final results.
N	$M_{\rm DM}$	$R_{\rm DM}$	$S_{\rm m}$	$Q_{\rm t}$	$a_{\rm max}$	bulge	bars in bars
c1	0.79	0.8	0.42	0.38	7	y	n
c2	0.77	2.39	0.33	0.44	8	y	n
c3	0.73	7.41	0.8	0.07	3.8	n	y
c4	0.78	2.40	0.48	0.37	5	weak	n
c5	0.73	7.41	0.70	0.08	6.5	n	y
c6	0.79	2.43	0.35	0.42	6.8	weak	n
c7	0.77	7.73	0.58	0.16	5.0	n	y
i1	0.73	2.21	0.25	0.4	9.5	y	n
i2	0.51	5.1	0.68	0.1	8	n	y
i3	0.7	2.12	0.3	0.39	10	y	n
i4	1.	3.03	0.33	0.42	6	y	n
15	0.95	9.5	0	0	0	n	no bar

Column 1: simulation number and simulation type; Col. 2: DM mass inside the disk radius in $5.9\times 10^{10}~ M_{\odot}$ ; Col. 3: halo-to disk mass ratio inside the disk radius; Col. 4: maximum bar strength at z=0: strong bar Mazzei & Curir (2001) require $S_{\rm m}\le 0.6$ ; Col 5: bar strength evaluated according to Combes & Sanders (1981), stronger bar corresponds to higher values of $Q_{\rm t}$ ; Col. 6: major axis (physical kpc) corresponding to the maximum bar strength; Col. 7: morphology of the inner region of the disk; Col. 8: peculiar features inside the disk.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text