![]() |
Figure 1: Accretion history of our selected DM halo as a function of the redshift: top panel from redshift z=40 to z=0, bottom panel from z=5 to z=0; solid (red) line shows the mass of the most massive progenitor of the halo, long-dashed (green) line that of the second most massive progenitor, dotted (magenta) line the total mass of progenitors (the most massive excluded), and short-dashed (blue) line the total mass of field particles. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: Evolution of isodensity contours of simulation c1 at 11 fixed levels (see Sect. 5). The size of all the frames is 20 h-1 physical kpc, here and in all the following figures in which isodensity contours are shown. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3: Evolution of density contours of simulation c2 as described in Fig. 2. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: Evolution of isodensity contours of simulation c3 as described in Fig. 2. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 5: Face-on, side-on and edge-on view of isodensity contours of simulation c1 at z=0. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 6: Face-on, side-on and edge-on view of isodensity contours of simulation c2 at z=0. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 7: Face-on, side-on and edge-on isodensity contours at z=0 of simulation c4 in Table 2. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Face-on, side-on and edge-on isodensity contours at z=0 of simulation c3 ( top panels) and c5 ( bottom panels) in Table 2. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9: Evolution of isodensity contours of simulation c4 as described in Fig. 2. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 10: Face on, side-on and edge-on isodensity contours of simulation c6 at z=0. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 11: Isodensity contours, in particular face-on, side-on and edge-on views of the inner bar of simulation c7 at z=0. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12: Ellipticity as a function of the major axis, a (in physical kpc), of simulation c1 at different redshifts: z=0 continuous line, z=0.25 long-dashed line, z=0.5 long and short dashed line, z=0.75 dot-dashed line, z=1 short dashed line, z=1.25 dotted line. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13: Ellipticity as a function of major axis, a, of simulation c2 at different redshifts; symbols are as in Fig. 12. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 14: Ellipticity as function of the major axis, a, for simulation c4 at different redshifts; symbols are as in Fig. 12. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 15: Evolution of bar strength after z=1 evaluated using the gravitational torque (see text) for the simulations c2 (full line), c4 (dotted line), and c6 (dashed line). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 16:
Radial density profiles of the DM halo in simulations c5 (dashed
lines) and i2 (solid lines) at
redshifts
z=0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 from top to bottom for simulation c5 and at the
equivalent evolutionary times for simulation i2. The three
couples of profiles below have been divided by
102, 104, 106 for
clarity. We also show a NFW density profile having a concentration
parameter
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 17: Evolution of isodensity contours of the simulation i5 at different evolutionary times: from top to bottom, t=5 Gyr, t=7.5 Gyr and t=10 Gyr; xy, yz and xz projections from left to right (see text (Sect. 7) for more details). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure A.1: Evolution of the ellipticity ( top panel) and of the bar length ( bottom panel) of simulations i1 (dashed line) and i3 (full line). |
| |
Figure A.3: xy, yz and xz projections from left to right after 7 Gyr for the high resolution cosmological run with disk-to-halo mass ratio 0.1. See text (Sect. 7) for more details. |