Table 4: List of the most prominent n=3 to n=2 transitions. The columns indicate: (1) the observed wavelength; (2) transition; (3) the line ratio of observation using the high-energy grating on Chandra (Desai et al. 2005); (4, 5) the n=4 R-matrix results for $\log T = 6.6$ and 6.8 respectively; (6) ratio of poulation of upper level due to radiative cascade to the population due to direct excitation for the n=4 R-matrix calculation; (7-9) the same as Cols. (4-6) but for the n=3 R-matrix calculation; (10, 11) APEC (version 1.10) intensities for $\log T=6.6,6.8$; (12) Desai et al. (2005) using an emission measure distribution peaked at $\log T=6.8$; (13) intensity ratios calculated using the distorted wave collision strengths of Sampson et al. (1991). Note: the 16.076 Å feature was measured by both a high-energy grating (HEG) and a medium-energy grating (MEG) which gave different results; the value in parentheses is from the MEG.
$\lambda$ (Å) Trans. Iobs I(n=4) C(n=4) I(n=3) C(n=3) I(APEC (Desai)) I(DW n=3)
14.208 56-1 (3d-2p)   0.64-0.64 0.01 0.65-0.65 <0.01 0.65-0.65 (0.65) 0.65-0.65
14.208 55-1 (3d-2p) 1.0 0.36-0.36 0.01 0.35-0.35 <0.01 0.35-0.35 (0.35) 0.35-0.35
14.261 53-1 (3d-2p)   0.15-0.15 0.02 0.14-0.14 <0.01 0.13-0.13 (0.13) 0.12-0.12
14.261 52-1 (3d-2p) 0.30 0.06-0.06 0.12 0.05-0.05 0.07 0.06-0.06 (0.08) 0.06-0.05
14.376 49-1 (3d-2p) 0.39 0.27-0.26 0.04 0.25-0.24 0.02 0.26-0.25 (0.26) 0.24-0.23
14.539 41-1 (3d-2p) 0.28 0.21-0.20 0.12 0.18-0.17 0.07 0.19-0.19 (0.19) 0.18-0.18
15.628 9-1 (3s-2p) 0.31 0.44-0.34 3.2 0.32-0.24 2.5 0.26-0.25 (0.27) 0.17-0.16
15.870 7-1 (3s-2p) 0.21 0.31-0.23 2.9 0.22-0.16 2.4 0.16-0.15 (0.17) 0.11-0.10
15.870 10-2 (3s-2p) 0.24 (bl) 0.18-0.13 2.9 0.12-0.08 2.2 0.08-0.08 (0.09) 0.05-0.04
16.008 5-1 (3s-2p) 0.58 (bl) 0.50-0.38 3.6 0.36-0.27 2.8 0.30-0.28 (0.71?) 0.20-0.17
16.076 4-1 (3s-2p) 0.71(0.59) 0.83-0.60 6.5 0.60-0.42 5.0 0.40-0.34 (0.39) 0.32-0.25


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text