Table 5: Coronet sources, X-ray-data.
No. Source ID C1a C2a X1a X2a X3a
    (cnts/ks) (cnts/ks) (cnts/ks) (cnts/ks) (cnts/ks)
1 IRS 2 $48.7 \pm 1.6$ $26.6 \pm 0.9$ $42.1 \pm 1.5$ $49.4 \pm 1.4$ $54.4 \pm 1.5$
2 Source 5 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
3   $0.5 \pm 0.2$ $0.8 \pm 0.2$ n.d. n.d. n.d.
4 IRS 5 $13.2 \pm 0.9$ $31.0 \pm 0.9$ $46.5 \pm 1.6$ $40.3 \pm 1.3$ $75.6 \pm 1.7$
5   n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
6 IRS 6 $ 2.4 \pm 0.4$ $ 1.5 \pm 0.2$ $ 3.4 \pm 0.8$ $ 0.9^{c} \pm 0.5$ $ 0.5^{c} \pm 0.5$
7 IRS 1 $22.9 \pm 1.1$ $30.9 \pm 0.9$ $31.7 \pm 1.4$ $10.9^{c} \pm 0.7$ $18.3^{c} \pm 0.9$
8 IRS 9 $ 2.9^{b} \pm 0.4$ $2.1 \pm 0.3$ $1.3^{d} \pm 0.4$ $2.8^{d} \pm 0.4$ $1.2^{d} \pm 0.4$
9 R CrA $ 3.2 \pm 0.5$ $ 3.1 \pm 0.3$ $5.2^{d} \pm 0.6$ $ 9.3^{d} \pm 0.6$ $ 6.8^{d} \pm 0.6$
10   n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
11 Source 9 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
12 IRS 7W $ 0.6 \pm 0.2$ $ 0.6 \pm 0.2$ $2.1^{d} \pm 0.4$ $ 2.6^{d} \pm 0.4$ $ 4.7^{d} \pm 0.5$
13   n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
14 IRS 7E $ 1.0 \pm 0.3$ $ 0.3 \pm 0.1$ $1.6^{d} \pm 0.4$ $ 3.7^{d} \pm 0.4$ $14.7^{d} \pm 0.8$
15   n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
a Background-subtracted count rates (0.5-10 keV) from X-ray datasets as listed in Table 2, Chandra and XMM-Newton count rates are not directly comparable. Additionally, different filters were used in the XMM-Newton observations: "thin'' for X1 and "medium'' for X2/X3.
b Flare.
c Source partly covered by chip gap, loss estimated to be $\approx$20%.
d Contamination from neighbouring source.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text