\begin{table}%t5
\caption{{\it Coronet} sources, X-ray-data.\label{sourcexrlist}}
%\centerline
{\begin{tabular}{ll|rr|rrr}
\hline\hline
No. & Source ID & C1$^{a}$           & C2$^{a}$    & X1$^{a}$          & X2$^{a}$            & X3$^{a}$ \\
    &           & (cnts/ks)            & (cnts/ks)     & (cnts/ks)           & (cnts/ks)             & (cnts/ks)  \\
\hline
%.                C1                       C2                X1                      X2                        X3  
1  & IRS~2      & $48.7 \pm 1.6$         & $26.6 \pm 0.9$  & $42.1 \pm 1.5$        & $49.4 \pm 1.4$          & $54.4 \pm 1.5$ \\
2  & Source 5   & n.d.                   & n.d.            & n.d.                  & n.d.                    & n.d.	         \\
3  &            & $0.5  \pm 0.2$         & $0.8  \pm 0.2$  & n.d. 	           & n.d. 	             & n.d.	       \\ 
4  & IRS~5      & $13.2 \pm 0.9$         & $31.0 \pm 0.9$  & $46.5 \pm 1.6$        & $40.3 \pm 1.3$          & $75.6 \pm 1.7$\\ 
5  &            & n.d. 		         & n.d.		   & n.d.	           & n.d.	             & n.d.	       \\ 
6  & IRS~6      & $ 2.4 \pm 0.4$         & $ 1.5 \pm 0.2$  & $ 3.4 \pm 0.8$        & $ 0.9^{c} \pm 0.5$  & $ 0.5^{c} \pm 0.5$\\ 
7  & IRS~1      & $22.9 \pm 1.1$         & $30.9 \pm 0.9$  & $31.7 \pm 1.4$        & $10.9^{c} \pm 0.7$  & $18.3^{c} \pm 0.9$\\
8  & IRS~9      & $ 2.9^{b} \pm 0.4$ & $2.1 \pm 0.3$   & $1.3^{d} \pm 0.4$ & $2.8^{d} \pm 0.4$   &  $1.2^{d} \pm 0.4$\\
9  & R CrA      & $ 3.2 \pm 0.5$         & $ 3.1 \pm 0.3$  & $5.2^{d} \pm 0.6$ & $ 9.3^{d} \pm 0.6$  & $ 6.8^{d} \pm 0.6$\\
10 &            & n.d.		         & n.d.		   & n.d.	           & n.d.	             & n.d.	       \\
11 & Source 9   & n.d. 		         & n.d. 	   & n.d.	           & n.d.	             & n.d.	       \\
12 & IRS~7W     & $ 0.6 \pm 0.2$         & $ 0.6 \pm 0.2$  & $2.1^{d} \pm 0.4$ & $ 2.6^{d} \pm 0.4$  & $ 4.7^{d} \pm 0.5$\\
13 &            & n.d.		         & n.d.		   & n.d.	           & n.d.	             & n.d.	       \\
14 & IRS~7E     & $ 1.0 \pm 0.3$         & $ 0.3 \pm 0.1$  & $1.6^{d} \pm 0.4$ & $ 3.7^{d} \pm 0.4$  & $14.7^{d} \pm 0.8$\\
15 &            & n.d.		         & n.d.		   & n.d.	           & n.d.	             & n.d.	       \\
%IRS9, C1, flare $^{\rm f}$, var 6
\hline
\end{tabular}}
%%\end{center}
\par
\smallskip
$^{a}$ Background-subtracted count rates (0.5--10~keV) from X-ray datasets as listed in Table~\ref{xraylist}, {\it Chandra} and XMM-{\it Newton} count rates are not directly comparable. Additionally, different filters were used in the XMM-{\it Newton} observations: "thin'' for X1 and "medium'' for X2/X3. \\
$^{b}$ Flare. \\
$^{c}$ Source partly covered by chip gap, loss estimated to be $\approx$$ 20$\%. \\
$^{d}$ Contamination from neighbouring source. \\
\end{table}