Table 2: The correlation of the rms fluctuation of the continuum intensity with our resulting correlations. Generally, the correlations are higher for parameters of the lower forming line (index 1) indicating a larger seeing influence.
$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,r_{1}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ -0.54 $\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ -0.02

$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{1},r_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ 0.02 $\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{1},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ 0.05

$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,r_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ -0.22 $\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{2},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ -0.21

$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle v_{1},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$ -0.27

**Table 2:** The correlation of the rms fluctuation of the continuum intensity with our resulting correlations. Generally, the correlations are higher for parameters of the lower forming line (index 1) indicating a larger seeing influence.
$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,r_{1}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	-0.54	$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	-0.02
$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{1},r_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	0.02	$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{1},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	0.05
$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle I,r_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	-0.22	$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle r_{2},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	-0.21
$\left\langle {\rm rms},\left\langle v_{1},v_{2}\right\rangle\right\rangle$	-0.27

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Data and observations
	3 Results
	4 Discussion and conclusion
	References