| Ion | Effective recomb. coeffs. | Comment |
| H I | Storey & Hummer (1995) | Case B |
| He I | Benjamin et al. (1999) | Case B; singlets |
| Brocklehurst (1972) | Case A; triplets | |
| He II | Storey & Hummer (1995) | Case B |
| C II | Davey et al. (2000) | Case B |
| C III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
| C IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| N II | Kisielius & Storey (2002) | Case B; triplets |
| Escalante & Victor (1990) | Case A; singlets | |
| N III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
| N IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
| N V | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| O II | Storey (1994) | Case B; quartets |
| Liu et al. (1995) | Case A; doublets | |
| O III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| O IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
| O V | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
| Ne II | Kisielius et al. (1998) | Case B; doublets |
| Storey (unpublished) | Case A; quartets | |
| Mg II | Davey et al. (2000)a | Case B |
|
a Given the similarity between the atomic structure of Mg II and C II,
we have assumed that the Mg II 3d-4f |