Ion | Effective recomb. coeffs. | Comment |
H I | Storey & Hummer (1995) | Case B |
He I | Benjamin et al. (1999) | Case B; singlets |
Brocklehurst (1972) | Case A; triplets | |
He II | Storey & Hummer (1995) | Case B |
C II | Davey et al. (2000) | Case B |
C III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
C IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
N II | Kisielius & Storey (2002) | Case B; triplets |
Escalante & Victor (1990) | Case A; singlets | |
N III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
N IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
N V | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
O II | Storey (1994) | Case B; quartets |
Liu et al. (1995) | Case A; doublets | |
O III | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
O IV | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
Nussbaumer & Storey (1984) | Dielectronic recom. | |
O V | Péquignot et al. (1991) | Case A |
Ne II | Kisielius et al. (1998) | Case B; doublets |
Storey (unpublished) | Case A; quartets | |
Mg II | Davey et al. (2000)a | Case B |
a Given the similarity between the atomic structure of Mg II and C II,
we have assumed that the Mg II 3d-4f ![]() ![]() |