Table 5: Binary properties of confirmed or suspected metal-deficient barium stars. The column labeled "Ba'' indicates whether detailed chemical analyses have confirmed the Ba nature of the star. The columns labeled $\chi ^2_{\mu _{\rm HIP} - \mu _{\rm Tyc}}$ and Prob( $\chi ^2 > \chi ^2_{\mu _{\rm HIP} - \mu _{\rm Tyc}})$ provide the $\chi ^2$ (and its associated probability) involved in the comparison of Hipparcos and Tycho-2 proper motions (see text for details). The column "Bin.'' has been set to "y'' if the first kind risk of rejecting the null hypothesis that the Tycho and Hipparcos proper motions are equal is smaller than 10%. The column labeled IAD indicates whether the signature of an orbital motion is present in the Hipparcos Intermediate Astrometric Data, according to the various tests described in the text. The column labeled  $\sigma (Vr)$ provides the radial-velocity standard deviation, $\Delta t$ and N correspond to the time span and number of observations, respectively. The columns labeled P and "Ref'' list the orbital period (when available) and the reference for the radial velocity and/or orbital data. The column "Binary'' gives the final binarity diagnostics.
HIP HD/DM Ba Ref. $\varpi$ (mas) $\mu_{\rm HIP} - \mu_{\rm Tyc}$ IAD $\sigma (Vr)$ $\Delta t$ N P Ref. Binary
          $\chi^2_{\rm obs}$ Prob( $\chi^2 > \chi^2_{\rm obs})$ Bin.   (km s-1) (d)   (d)    

4347
5424     $0.22\pm1.42$ 1.05 0.59 n n 2.32 3306 13 1881 6 y
11595 15589     $2.03\pm1.21$ 1.63 0.44 n n - - - -   ?
25161 $-27^\circ$2233     $0.89\pm1.35$ 0.23 0.89 n n - - - -   ?
29740 43 389     $-1.25\pm1.00$ 4.54 0.10 y y 3.85 3350 24 1689 6 y
34795 55 496 y 5 $2.44\pm1.04$ 0.02 0.99 n y 0.73 5121 24 - 2 y?
58596 104 340 y 3 $-0.97\pm1.09$ 3.39 0.18 n n 1.64 2587 16 - 2 n
69834 123 396     $1.73\pm0.86$ 1.98 0.27 n n - - - -   ?
76605 139 409 y 2 $5.51\pm1.14$ 4.98 0.08 y n 0.66 1478 2 - 2 y?
97874 187 762     $2.07\pm1.53$ 9.00 0.01 y y - - - -   y
107478 206 983 y 3 $3.75\pm1.86$ 2.94 0.23 n y - - - -   y?

Additional stars (from refs. (1), (5) and (10))
                           
43042 + $75^\circ 348$ y 1 $1.02\pm1.32$ 0.12 0.94 n y 4.64 1436 33 1042 11 y
55852 + $4^\circ 2466$ y 4,5 $0.96\pm1.83$ 0.43 0.81 n n 3.38 6191 41 4592 2 y
  + $3^\circ 2688$ y 5 - - - - - 0.45 986 7 - 2 n?
  CS 22942-019 y 10 - - - - - 3.42 3274 15 2800 10 y
  CS 22948-027 y 10 - - - - - 1.87 2560 13 505 10 y
References to the table: (1) Zacs et al. (2000); (2) this work (3) Junqueira & Pereira (2001); (4) Burris et al. (2000); (5) Luck & Bond (1991); (6) Udry et al. (1998); (10) Preston & Sneden (2001); (11) Zacs et al. (2005).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text