**Table 5:** Results of modelfit - VLA images.
		8.4 GHz		22.5 GHz
Source	Component	Peak	Flux	Peak	Flux	$\alpha_{8.4}^{22}$	Size
		$\left(\frac{{\rm mJy}}{{\rm beam}}\right)$	(mJy)	$\left(\frac{{\rm mJy}}{{\rm beam}}\right)$	(mJy)		$^{\prime \prime }$
0222+36	core	174	179	89	91	$0.69 \pm 0.02$	0.05
	NE lobe	5.7	7.0	1.5	2.8	$0.93 \pm 0.04$	0.2
	SW lobe	3.2	5.7	0.6	2.2	$0.97 \pm 0.04$	0.4
	total	-	192	-	95	$0.71 \pm 0.02$	1.6
0258+35	core region	119	167	52	14+57	$0.87 \pm 0.02$	0.08
	SE jet	58	134	15	77	$0.56 \pm 0.02$	1.0
	E lobe	21	197	4.8	77	$0.95 \pm 0.02$	1.6
	NW lobe	14	93	2.6	37	$0.93 \pm 0.02$	1.6
	total	-	610	-	255	$0.88 \pm 0.01$	3.5
0648+27	N lobe	11	19	2.2	2.9+2.3	$1.31 \pm 0.03$	0.6
	S lobe	8.4	14	0.9	4.9	$1.06 \pm 0.03$	0.6
	total	-	31	-	9.3	$1.22 \pm 0.02$
1037+30	core	2.2	3.9	1.0	2.6	$0.41 \pm 0.06$	0.04
	jet knot	1.2	2.4	-	-	-	0.4
	S lobe	1.2	10	-	-	-	1.2
	S hotspot	2.3	8.6	-	-	-	0.4
	N lobe	5.7	22	-	-	-	0.8
	N hotspot	13	20	4.3	12	$0.52 \pm 0.02$	0.4
	total	-	63	-	14	$1.53 \pm 0.02$	3
1855+37	core	0.6	0.9	-	-	-	0.3
	total	-	35.9	-	-	-	8

Note - Uncertainties in Col. 7 are $1\sigma$ values based on the absolute flux calibration and noise in the images. The core region in 0258+35 and the northern lobe in 0648+27 are resolved in two components at 22 GHz, therefore we give two values in Col. 6 and the spectral index is spurious. See Table 6 for a more reliable estimate of the cores spectral index. The source 1855+37 is not detected at 22 GHz.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations and data reduction
	3 Results
	4 Discussion
	5 Conclusions
	References