Table 11: Element-to-element abundance ratios for individual stars, averaged over the whole sample. For comparison, we also give the values found by Gratton et al. (2003a) and James et al. (2004).

Star	n	[O/Fe]I	n	[Na/Fe]I	n	[Mg/Fe]I	n	[Si/Fe]I	n	[Ca/Fe]I
25072	1	-0.09	2	+0.35	2	+0.41	3	+0.34	9	+0.29
26529	1	-0.10	2	+0.39	2	+0.41	2	+0.18	9	+0.37
30409	1	+0.46	2	+0.18	2	+0.60	3	+0.37	10	+0.43
30426	1	+0.18	2	+0.27	2	+0.41	3	+0.22	10	+0.38
34854	1	+0.33	2	+0.31	2	+0.69	3	+0.45	7	+0.43
37999	1	+0.59	1	-0.01	2	+0.52	4	+0.32	12	+0.34
39672	1	<-0.07	1	+0.46	2	+0.52	1	+0.31	6	+0.30
Average		+0.19		+0.29		+0.51		+0.31		+0.36
error		0.11		0.06		0.04		0.03		0.02
rms		0.28		0.16		0.11		0.09		0.06
compare to						+0.28				+0.31
Star	n	[Sc/Fe]II	n	[Ti/Fe]I	n	[Ni/Fe]I	n	[Ba/Fe]II
25072	1	+0.26	1	+0.30	2	-0.15	2	+0.27	+0.34
26529	1	-0.04	1	+0.19	2	-0.14	2	+0.29	+0.29
30409	1	-0.01	2	+0.15	2	-0.11	2	+0.39	+0.39
30426			2	+0.17	2	-0.18	2	+0.45	+0.30
34854	1	+0.05			2	-0.21	2	+0.37	+0.44
37999	2	-0.04	2	+0.16	2	-0.25	2	+0.28	+0.34
39672					1	-0.32	2	+0.43	+0.33
Average		+0.06		+0.19		-0.19		+0.35	+0.35
error		0.05		0.03		0.03		0.03	0.02
rms		0.12		0.06		0.07		0.07	0.05
compare to		-0.06		+0.20		-0.11		+0.18	+0.27