\begin{table}%t11
\caption{Element-to-element abundance ratios for individual stars, averaged over the whole sample. For comparison, we also give the values found by Gratton et~al. (\cite{Grat03a}) and James et~al. (\cite{Jame04}).}
\label{t:uvesother}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
\hline  \hline
Star  & $n$ &[O/Fe]I& $n$ &[Na/Fe]I& $n$ &[Mg/Fe]I& $n$ &[Si/Fe]I& $n$ &[Ca/Fe]I\\
\hline
25072 & 1&$-$0.09&2&  +0.35& 2& +0.41 & 3& +0.34 & 9& +0.29 \\
26529 & 1&$-$0.10&2&  +0.39& 2& +0.41 & 2& +0.18 & 9& +0.37 \\
30409 & 1&  +0.46&2&  +0.18& 2& +0.60 & 3& +0.37 &10& +0.43 \\
30426 & 1&  +0.18&2&  +0.27& 2& +0.41 & 3& +0.22 &10& +0.38 \\
34854 & 1&  +0.33&2&  +0.31& 2& +0.69 & 3& +0.45 & 7& +0.43 \\
37999 & 1&  +0.59&1&$-$0.01& 2& +0.52 & 4& +0.32 &12& +0.34 \\
39672 &1&$<$$-$0.07&1&  +0.46& 2& +0.52 & 1& +0.31 & 6& +0.30 \\
\hline
Average& & +0.19&  & +0.29 &  & +0.51 &  & +0.31 &  & +0.36 \\
error  & &~~0.11&  &~~0.06 &  &~~0.04 &  &~~0.03 &  &~~0.02 \\
rms & &~~0.28&  &~~0.16 &  &~~0.11 &  &~~0.09 &  &~~0.06 \\
compare to &&    &  &       &  & +0.28 &  &       &  & +0.31 \\  
\hline
Star  & $n$ &[Sc/Fe]II& $n$ & [Ti/Fe]I& $n$ &[Ni/Fe]I& $n$ &[Ba/Fe]II&$[\alpha/{\rm Fe}]$\\
\hline
25072 & 1&  +0.26 & 1& +0.30 & 2&$-$0.15& 2& +0.27 & +0.34 \\
26529 & 1&$-$0.04 & 1& +0.19 & 2&$-$0.14& 2& +0.29 & +0.29 \\
30409 & 1&$-$0.01 & 2& +0.15 & 2&$-$0.11& 2& +0.39 & +0.39 \\
30426 &  &        & 2& +0.17 & 2&$-$0.18& 2& +0.45 & +0.30 \\
34854 & 1&  +0.05 &  &       & 2&$-$0.21& 2& +0.37 & +0.44 \\
37999 & 2&$-$0.04 & 2& +0.16 & 2&$-$0.25& 2& +0.28 & +0.34 \\
39672 &  &        &  &       & 1&$-$0.32& 2& +0.43 & +0.33 \\
\hline
Average&  & +0.06  &  & +0.19 &  &$-$0.19&  & +0.35 & +0.35 \\
error  &  &~~0.05  &  &~~0.03 &  &~~0.03 &  &~~0.03 &~~0.02 \\
rms &  &~~0.12  &  &~~0.06 &  &~~0.07 &  &~~0.07 &~~0.05 \\
compare to &&$-$0.06& & +0.20 &  &$-$0.11&  & +0.18 & +0.27 \\  
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}