Table 7: The best fit circular Gaussians of the 5 GHz data over four epochs. The flux density errors are $\sim$ $5\%$ , and the uncertainties of the location and size of the Gaussians range between 0.2-0.5 of the beam size depending on the respective flux density.
Epoch Flux density Location Size

(mJy) r (mas) $\vartheta$ (deg) diam (mas)

1991.4 Core 139 0 0 0.57

C1 132 1.81 0.2 1.01

C2 133 3.38 11.3 0.85

1993.4 Core 282 0 0 0.51

C1 113 2.47 4.9 0.57

C2 61 3.76 10.7 0.20

1996.6 Core 337 0 0 0.40

C1 97 2.32 6.0 1.13

C2 80 3.9 12.0 0.94

1999.9 Core 439 0 0 0.41

C1 78 2.07 7.8 1.00

C2 84 3.83 11.1 1.18

**Table 7:** The best fit circular Gaussians of the 5 GHz data over four epochs. The flux density errors are $\sim$ $5\%$ , and the uncertainties of the location and size of the Gaussians range between 0.2-0.5 of the beam size depending on the respective flux density.
Epoch		Flux density	Location	Size
		(mJy)	r (mas)	$\vartheta$ (deg)	diam (mas)
1991.4	Core	139	0	0	0.57
	C1	132	1.81	0.2	1.01
	C2	133	3.38	11.3	0.85
1993.4	Core	282	0	0	0.51
	C1	113	2.47	4.9	0.57
	C2	61	3.76	10.7	0.20
1996.6	Core	337	0	0	0.40
	C1	97	2.32	6.0	1.13
	C2	80	3.9	12.0	0.94
1999.9	Core	439	0	0	0.41
	C1	78	2.07	7.8	1.00
	C2	84	3.83	11.1	1.18

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

	1 Introduction
	2 Observations
	3 Radio properties of the quasar J1101+7225
	4 Discussion of the results
	References